User Controls

Posts by infinityshock lovingly lanced lannys longing labia, letting her larp as a little laotian ladyboy lapdancer..........................................

  1. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    They aren't. They began the preliminary designs of the merkava after their war with the a-rabs in the early 70s which they based on balls-to-the-wall frontal attacks with poor/mediocre maneuvering and their glacis (front) plates taking massive damage. The kike designer thought it'd be a good idea to mount the drive train in the front to better protect the crew...which was actually a dumbass idea because normal tankers don't sit still or intentionally sit still long enough to get hit intentionally. Now the merkava takes a penetrating hit in the front and it's a soft kill as in the tank is no longer mobile. Any other tank would still have mobility because it's engine/tranny is in the trunk.

    That's why no other country buys them
  2. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ja ja ja.

    cheap antitank missiles. how many tons of javelins and other antitank weapon has US and NATO supplied to ukraine and why are russians still rolling around in tanks.

    A better question would be to ask the kikes about all the merkavas that are no longer in their OOB (inventory) after yesterday.

    Their vaunted anti-antitank missile system isn't so effective after all.
  3. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny but since you said they have limited range and sub time theyre not ideal for offensive purposes.

    I meant unlimited range submerged. The Iranians don't have much need for an open water navy...they live on an oversized lake. They work just fine against tankers and cargo ships...and any country with a poor ASW capability
  4. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny then why is russia churning out thousands of more tanks per year,

    are yiu saying russians are stoopit.

    The same country that sends countless troops to the front line to be slaughtered. No, theyre not an example to be mimicked

    Yes.

    Cheap antitank missiles are a few thousand dollars. Decent ones are about $20k...no, tanks need to stay off the battlefield. Ask the kikes how their tanks are doing in kikeland
  5. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny tell us something we dont already know.

    In every post...
  6. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny diesel subs are for defensive purposeses ?

    Diesel subs are cheaper and easier to maintain. They're used for the same purposes as larger nuke subs
  7. Originally posted by aldra Militias chimping out hard on US bases in Syria, at least three bases targeted with drones and missiles

    Hamas released a few elderly hostages, have said they're trading 50 but haven't said what for yet

    The kikes made a couple of pathetic attempts at probing and were duly and generously sodimized...sans lube...and quite a few of their sacred tanks.

    I keep saying tanks are obsolete but no one wants to hear it.

    What makes it even more embarrassing is they're repeating the same mistakes the nazis did during stalingrad.
  8. Originally posted by aldra

    I might make a map showing the ranges of the known missile systems of the different players in the region

    Hezbullah apparently has P-800 ONYX anti shipping missiles that the ships are staying outside of the range of and Russia's flying Kinzahl platforms around the Black Sea which puts them in range too

    Everyone keeps harping on the oniks and kinzahls but no one has mentioned the kh-22s or kh-32s...which is what they need to be worried about.
  9. Originally posted by aldra everyone has a hard time detecting diesel subs, not so much nuclear

    the submarines are still the most credible part of the US nuclear triad

    That's not how it works.

    Diesels run on batteries but they still have other machinery that makes noise. Diesels have to surface at which point they are instantly detected thereupon they have a known operating range from that point which makes it EASIER for them to be found.

    AIP...that's where it's at for low-budget stealth subs.
  10. Originally posted by aldra prove it.

    in reality the IDF's killed a confirmed 29 UN workers so far; imagine the chimpout if Russia or Syria had done that


    fuys

    just imagine

    They really did kill at least 100 hamas terrorists. All of them ranged in age from 4 to 8 years old.

    Just like the kikes blowing up residential buildings that people live in is 'wiping out terrorist homes.'

    And kikes wonder why no one likes them
Jump to Top