User Controls

Project 2025

  1. Dirtbag African Astronaut
    https://www.rawstory.com/secret-service-elon-musk-trump-ai-biden/
  2. Originally posted by Dirtbag https://www.rawstory.com/secret-service-elon-musk-trump-ai-biden/

    The very same clowns posted Trump's bloody, severed head and threatened to blow up the White House with him in it, but now they're the pillars of goodness. Pretty laughable. These stinking hypocrites are a joke.
  3. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Dirtbag "Elsewhere in the document, there are proposals to eliminate the morning-after pill from the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate under the rationale that it is a “potential abortifacient”; to revoke a Biden-era rule that allows members of the military and their dependents who are stationed in states with abortion bans to seek medical care in other states; to prohibit Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid funds; to punish states that require insurance to cover abortion; and to end the requirement that hospitals provide medically necessary abortions under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act and, separately, use the law to “investigate” hospitals and doctors who provide abortions.

    The chapter on the U.S. Agency for International Development suggests not only that the next administration remove references to “abortion,” “reproductive health,” and “sexual and reproductive rights” from all agency materials, but also propose creating a new position that would involve, among other responsibilities, pressing the United Nations for “assurances that language promoting abortion will be removed from U.N. documents, policy statements and technical literature.”"

    Killing a living organism is not contraception.
  4. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Killing a living organism is not contraception.

    I think you mean to say "contraception that aligns with your morals"
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood I think you mean to say "contraception that aligns with your morals"

    Contraception is a prevention not a termination dumb ass. Morality has nothing to due with the definition you brain dead mung.
  6. Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood I think you mean to say "contraception that aligns with your morals"

    Yeah... you goddamned, ugly, rat-faced, schizoid, nice-smelling, idiotic, mad-hatter-crazy fellow human.
  7. lol @ nice smelling
  8. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Contraception is a prevention not a termination dumb ass.

    Says whom?
  9. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Says whom?

    okay the AI says i'm wrong here

    In scientific and medical contexts, birth control and contraception refer to methods and devices used to prevent pregnancy. These methods include:

    Hormonal contraceptives (e.g., pills, patches, injections, and implants)
    Barrier methods (e.g., condoms, diaphragms)
    Intrauterine devices (IUDs)
    Sterilization (e.g., vasectomy, tubal ligation)
    Behavioral methods (e.g., fertility awareness, withdrawal)

    These methods prevent conception from occurring and are not typically associated with terminating an existing pregnancy.

    The termination of a pregnancy after conception falls under the category of abortion. Abortion is a medical procedure to end a pregnancy and can be classified into:

    Medical abortion (using medication to end a pregnancy)
    Surgical abortion (a procedure to remove the contents of the uterus)

    Both contraception and abortion are distinct concepts and are addressed separately in medical and scientific literature.

    I just wanted to clarify definitions. I thought it was technically classified as the same thing but medical literature says otherwise. I don't outright blindly trust medical literature as a rule or anything but I base a lot of my opinions off what I consider to be scientific consensus (which 97& of climate scientists would probably agree with, and also the other 3% as well)
  10. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    If you need artificial intelligence perhaps you shouldn't have chemically cooked your natural intelligence.
  11. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    It is not enough for conservatives to win elections. If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on Day One of the next conservative Administration.

    This is the goal of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. The project will build on four pillars that will, collectively, pave the way for an effective conservative Administration.

    Project 2025 logo mobile
    MENU
    ABOUT
    About Project 2025
    Building now for a conservative victory through policy, personnel, and training.

    The actions of liberal politicians in Washington have created a desperate need and unique opportunity for conservatives to start undoing the damage the Left has wrought and build a better country for all Americans in 2025.

    It is not enough for conservatives to win elections. If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on day one of the next conservative administration.

    This is the goal of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. The project will build on four pillars that will, collectively, pave the way for an effective conservative administration: a policy agenda, personnel, training, and a 180-day playbook.

    The project is the effort of a broad coalition of conservative organizations that have come together to ensure a successful administration begins in January 2025. With the right conservative policy recommendations and properly vetted and trained personnel to implement them, we will take back our government.

    The 2025 Presidential Transition Project is being organized by The Heritage Foundation and builds off Heritage’s longstanding “Mandate for Leadership,” which has been highly influential for presidential administrations since the Reagan era. Most recently, the Trump administration relied heavily on Heritage’s “Mandate” for policy guidance, embracing nearly two-thirds of Heritage’s proposals within just one year in office.

    Paul Dans, former chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) during the Trump administration, serves as the director of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. Spencer Chretien, former special assistant to the president and associate director of Presidential Personnel, serves as associate director of the project.

    180-Day Playbook
    The time is short, and conservatives need a plan. The project will create a playbook of actions to be taken in the first 180 days of the new Administration to bring quick relief to Americans suffering from the Left’s devastating policies.

    The fourth pillar of Project 2025 is our 180-day Transition Playbook and includes a comprehensive, concrete transition plan for each federal agency. Only through the implementation of specific action plans at each agency will the next conservative presidential Administration be successful.

    Pillar IV will provide the next President a roadmap for doing just that. To learn more about Project 2025’s vision for a conservative administration, please read our recently published book, Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise.

    The 2025 Presidential Transition Project paves the way for an effective conservative Administration based on four pillars: a policy agenda, Presidential Personnel Database, Presidential Administration Academy, and playbook for the first 180 days of the next Administration.
  12. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
  13. Project 2025 could very well be a globalist Marxist democrat false flag operation, like QAnon was.
  14. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Project 2025 could very well be a globalist Marxist democrat false flag operation, like QAnon was.

    It's from the Heritage Foundation Billy Goat.

  15. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    When conservatives do finally make it into an administration, they often don’t know what to do or how to seize the gears of power effectively.
    Rudy Sulgan / Getty Images
    KEY TAKEAWAYS
    It’s past time to lay the groundwork for a White House more friendly to the right.

    The policy book Mandate for Leadership represents the work of more than 350 leading conservatives and outlines a vision of conservative success.

    The usual suspects in the permanent political class will be ready for the next conservative administration. Will we be ready for them?

    With the Biden administration over and with the immediate dangers inherent to one-party rule in Washington behind us for now, it’s past time to lay the groundwork for a White House more friendly to the right. For decades, as the left has continued its march through America’s institutions, conservatives have been outgunned and outmatched when it comes to the art of government.

    One reason is because the Republican establishment never moved on from the 1980s. Beltway conservatives still prioritize supply-side economics and a bellicose foreign policy above all else. Belief in small government, strangely enough, has manifested itself in a belief among some conservatives that we should lead by example and not fill all political appointments. Belief in the primacy of the national security state has caused conservative administrations to defer political decisions to the generals and the intelligence community.

    The result has been decades of disappointment.

    Fortunately, this situation is changing. The conservative movement increasingly knows what time it is in America. More and more of our politicians are willing to use the government to achieve our vision, because the neutrality of “keeping the government out of it” will lose every time to the left’s vast power. The calls for a “new Church Committee” represent a momentous shift in energy; while conservatives used to lament liberal Sen. Frank Church’s original project as a kooky leftist attack against “The Brave Men And Women of Our Intelligence Community,” we’re now the ones agitating for Congress to go after the three-letter agencies.

    This new vigor of the right can be found at Project 2025. Organized by the Heritage Foundation, Project 2025 has brought together 45 (and counting) right-of-center organizations that are ready to get into the business of restoring this country through the combination of the right policies and well-trained people. The Project’s foundation is built on four interconnected pillars.

    >>> Project 2025: Presidential Transition Project

    The first pillar, the upcoming production of the policy book Mandate for Leadership, represents the work of more than 350 leading conservatives and outlines a vision of conservative success at each federal agency during the next administration. Presidential candidates won’t be able to ignore what the conservative movement demands in this book.

    The second is our online personnel database. This “Conservative LinkedIn” will launch in March and will provide an opportunity for rock-solid conservatives to place themselves in contention for roles in the next administration. This pillar will bring Mr. (and Mrs.) Smith to Washington.

    The third is our Presidential Administration Academy. When conservatives do finally make it into an administration, they often don’t know what to do or how to seize the gears of power effectively. Through their action, inaction, and their encyclopedic knowledge of volumes of technicalities about the federal workforce, certain career federal employees are masterful in tripping us up. Our interactive, on-demand training sessions will change that. They will turn future conservative political appointees into experts in governmental effectiveness.

    The fourth and final pillar of Project 2025 is our Playbook, which will take the policy ideas expressed in Mandate for Leadership and transform them into an implementation plan for each agency to advocate to the incoming administration. What regulations and executive orders must be signed on Day One? Where are the greatest needs for more political appointees? How can we effectively use the mechanisms of government to face our most challenging problems? Our Playbook will put our movement to work answering questions like these.

    In November 2016, American conservatives stood on the verge of greatness. The election of Donald Trump to the presidency was a triumph that offered the best chance to reverse the left’s incessant march of progress for its own sake. Many of the best accomplishments, though, happened only in the last year of the Trump administration, after our political appointees had finally figured out the policies and process of different agencies, and after the right personnel were finally in place.

    The usual suspects in the permanent political class will be ready for the next conservative administration. Will we be ready for them? That’s where Project 2025 comes in. We have two years, and one chance, to get this right.
  16. The Heritage Foundation's trustees have historically included individuals affiliated with Chase Manhattan Bank, Dow Chemical, General Motors, Mobil, Pfizer, Sears, and other corporations.[164] It is not required to disclose its donors and donations under the current laws that guide tax-deductible organizations.[166] In the 1980s, the Heritage Foundation reportedly received a $2.2 million donation from South Korea's National Intelligence Service, South Korea's intelligence agency, then known as the Korean Central Intelligence Agency.[168]

    Sounds like a totally trustworthy bunch of people. I mean, who doesn't like and trust bankers, mega-corporations, oil companies and shysters like Pfizer.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The Heritage Foundation's trustees have historically included individuals affiliated with Chase Manhattan Bank, Dow Chemical, General Motors, Mobil, Pfizer, Sears, and other corporations.[164] It is not required to disclose its donors and donations under the current laws that guide tax-deductible organizations.[166] In the 1980s, the Heritage Foundation reportedly received a $2.2 million donation from South Korea's National Intelligence Service, South Korea's intelligence agency, then known as the Korean Central Intelligence Agency.[168]

    Sounds like a totally trustworthy bunch of people. I mean, who doesn't like and trust bankers, mega-corporations, oil companies and shysters like Pfizer.

    You used Wikipedia as your source?

  18. I wouldn't trust them with shit. All I've seen is talk, no action.
  19. Incessant African Astronaut
    Originally posted by frala A black man is going to destroy your uterus, not protect it

    Lol I honestly think there how my iud got knocked out of place
  20. Incessant African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Dirtbag If you buy me Botox my hatred won't be directed at you come November, despite your username. I will forget everything but won't talk to you or feel any particular way about what you just said.

    Quoting blackmail
Jump to Top