User Controls

Hey Vinnie.

  1. #21
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Less viral is still viral…

    Just as being less fat is still being fat.

    below the threshold that could be considered viral.
  2. #22
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny below the threshold that could be considered viral.

    No, it was definitely above the threshold, again tiktok, youtube, instagram etc..all global platforms with billions of users. You were probably too busy serving coffee or your 3rd world country censored it.
  3. #23
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No, it was definitely above the threshold, again tiktok, youtube, instagram etc..all global platforms with billions of users. You were probably too busy serving coffee or your 3rd world country censored it.

    lets see the numbers.

    how many views/user bases on these social media.
  4. #24
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny lets see the numbers.

    how many views/user bases on these social media.

    I'm sure the views of said video are readily available on all those platforms, you simply have to go and look!

    Ignorance isn't an excuse Vincenti
  5. #25
    Here you go I'll get you started

    https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=bobby+lee+childhood+story

    About 13,600,000 results
  6. #26
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Here you go I'll get you started

    https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=bobby+lee+childhood+story

    About 13,600,000 results

    /8 000 000 000 000 people on this planet, that math out to about like ... you know the number.
  7. #27
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny /8 000 000 000 000 people on this planet, that math out to about like … you know the number.



    13 million search results...if each of those results received 10,000 views...then 10,000 x 13 million...

    Math is hard huh
  8. #28
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson

    13 million search results…if each of those results received 10,000 views…then 10,000 x 13 million…

    Math is hard huh



    whens the last time you or anyone you know viewed the search results after more than 2 pages ?

    or more than 5 pages max.
  9. #29
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    whens the last time you or anyone you know viewed the search results after more than 2 pages ?

    or more than 5 pages max.

    Hence why I told you to go do the research if you want precise numbers!

    You rely on assumption too much vinny and not enough research! we call that lazy and ignorant here in the west.
  10. #30
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Hence why I told you to go do the research if you want precise numbers!

    so you admit that you dont have the actual numbers and was basing your allegation on your pure ass-sumptions.

    no further questions your owner.
  11. #31
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny so you admit that you dont have the actual numbers

    Um I never said I did

    I said the video was viral...it is. I've demonstrated a search of the video produces 13 million results and it's on all the big global platforms.

    Job done!

    You are free to research the actual numbers yourself!...but I bet you wont.
  12. #32
    Here you go...I'll get you started.

    Copy of the video here...

    6.5 million views just for this *1* link



    Now go check the other 13 million results...
  13. #33
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Um I never said I did

    I said the video was viral…it is. I've demonstrated a search of the video produces 13 million results and it's on all the big global platforms.

    Job done!

    You are free to research the actual numbers yourself!…but I bet you wont.



    1] 13 million results for the combination of 4 words which means any webpage with EITHER word "bobby", "lee", "childhood" or "story" would show up among the 13 million results.

    2] webpage results are not retweets and they do not indicate viewership and content interaction.

    3] you still have no actual number of the people whove seen it.



    british man doesnt understand how internet works.
  14. #34
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Here you go…I'll get you started.

    Copy of the video here…

    6.5 million views just for this *1* link




    6.5 million views



    thats like less than 2% of the US population, less than they are jéws in the US.
  15. #35
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    1] 13 million results for the combination of 4 words which means any webpage with EITHER word "bobby", "lee", "childhood" or "story" would show up among the 13 million results.

    2] webpage results are not retweets and they do not indicate viewership and content interaction.

    3] you still have no actual number of the people whove seen it.



    british man doesnt understand how internet works.

    Again, another example of you assuming and not doing the actual research...go look at each individual result and compile the numbers you desire..once done we can then discuss the actual numbers and how many are required for the term "viral" to apply.

  16. #36
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Again, another example of you assuming and not doing the actual research…go look at each individual result and compile the numbers you desire..once done we can then discuss the actual numbers and how many are required for the term "viral" to apply.




    from page 3 onwards the results agregated by google no longer contain EITHER the word "bobby or "lee", much less the person "bobby lee".



    british man fails internet.
  17. #37
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    from page 3 onwards the results agregated by google no longer contain EITHER the word "bobby or "lee", much less the person "bobby lee".



    british man fails internet.

    Chingchong once again fails to do his research...only looks at 4 pages of 13 million results

    Vinny you already demonstrated this method of assumption doesn't work with your failed NIS search engine results, you HAVE to do the work yourself if you want EXACT numbers ...
  18. #38
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Chingchong once again fails to do his research…only looks at 4 pages of 13 million results

    Vinny you already demonstrated this method of assumption doesn't work with your failed NIS search engine results, you HAVE to do the work yourself if you want EXACT numbers …



    fails his own data set.

    have you tried boolean search with quotation marks.
  19. #39
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    fails his own data set.

    have you tried boolean search with quotation marks.

    When I'm researching actual exact numbers I don't rely on any search results...I do the work myself.

    No search is 100% effective as you already demonstrated.

    You spent 10 maybe 20 seconds and 0 seconds on actual research.
  20. #40
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson When I'm researching actual exact numbers I don't rely on any search results…I do the work myself.



    by going house to house ?
Jump to Top