User Controls

The butcher's bill in coming in for the vaxx

  1. Idaho is introducing legislation to make it a criminal act to administer the mRNA gene therapy. It never had FDA approval, and they've been extorting people to take it with only emergency-use-only authorization.
  2. i da whore
  3. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It never had FDA approval

    It is now.

    https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/moderna-covid-19-vaccines

    On January 31, 2022, the FDA announced the second approval of a COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Spikevax, for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 18 years of age and older.
  4. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson It is now.

    https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/moderna-covid-19-vaccines

    On January 31, 2022, the FDA announced the second approval of a COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Spikevax, for the prevention of COVID-19 in individuals 18 years of age and older.

    The approval letter states there are still no safety studies that have been completed. Just because a bunch of BigPharma shills declare a substance safe doesn't mean it is. Without safety studies, no one should inject this garbage.
  5. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The approval letter states there are still no safety studies that have been completed. Just because a bunch of BigPharma shills declare a substance safe doesn't mean it is. Without safety studies, no one should inject this garbage.

    You're moving the goal posts again...

    You said no FDA approval..it is FDA approved.
  6. ...and since when did you care what the FDA or CDC or WHO says anyway?

    (only when it suits your narrative?)
  7. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Xlite Try this then https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

    Obviously nobody is able to report their own death but that doesn't change the fact that people are dying of heart failure after the vaccine. Its also important to note that it is not in the interest of the people in charge to spread panic which would surely ensue if the mainstream media acknowledged this.

    If you can't be assed to look into the information provided in this thread then i have nothing more to say to you.
    You failing to consider all three sides of the coin fairly is a failure on your part. That's what happens when you're biased. It would make you a good politician though.

    Three sided coins would not fit in your pockets well.
  8. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson …and since when did you care what the FDA or CDC or WHO says anyway?

    (only when it suits your narrative?)

    Don't make me have to fry your fish and chips, kid.
  9. Xlite African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Three sided coins would not fit in your pockets well.

    They do though.
  10. The edge is a side.
  11. https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/pfizer-knowingly-allowed-dangerous-components-in-its-vaccines-part-1_5060324.html

    Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains scary science thing fragments called “truncated scary science thing.” This is a serious issue on top of the vaccine’s life-threatening safety events. Stunningly, Pfizer submitted falsified scary science thing analytical reports to multiple health authorities.

    The issue of truncated scary science thing led the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to raise a “major objection” before its December 2020 conditional approval of the vaccine. What has happened? How have these issues been considered resolved? This two-part series article will address the matter in depth and examine its potential consequences for human health.

    Summary of Key Facts

    Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains truncated scary science thing, which the EMA flagged as a reason for its “major objection,” indicating a preclusion of their approval.

    Pfizer has not investigated the detrimental outcomes of truncated scary science thing in its vaccines.

    Pfizer submitted Western blot figures to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the EMA that were digitally generated—not from actual experiments.

    There has been an alarming lack of action taken by health authorities on this issue.

    Truncated scary science thing potentially contributes to multiple vaccine-related injuries, including misfolded spike protein-induced fibrous blood clots, autoimmune disorders, and cancer.

    These problems with the Pfizer vaccine could have resulted in drastic product quality variations from batch to batch. This could explain the difference in adverse events experienced by vaccine recipients.

    The root cause of such irresponsible conduct by pharma and health authorities is a lack of ethics.

    When you go to a supermarket and want to buy 10 bottles of whole milk for your children, you usually assume the chemicals and concentrations in these 10 bottles are the same or similar. No one would expect five of the bottles to be filled with watered-down milk while the other five were filled with yogurt.

    Most store-bought foods meet our expectations because of regulations and quality control. The same criteria also exist in the pharma industry, including vaccine products.

    We expect consistent physical and chemical parameters of key ingredients across different batches of drug or vaccine products. Consistency is the foundation that allows patients and consumers to have confidence in the safety and effectiveness of medications.

    The CMC process—short for chemistry, manufacturing, and controls—involves defining manufacturing practices and product specifications that must be followed to ensure product safety and consistency between batches. This is a mandatory criterion for global health authorities to approve a drug or vaccine.

    Controlling the quality of a traditional chemical product is relatively straightforward, but for a biological product, like an scary science thing, things become more complicated.
    What Is Truncated scary science thing? Why Does it Matter?

    Our DNA contains gene codes composed of nucleotides. DNA makes proteins consisting of amino acids. Between the gene code and protein, there is a bridge molecule, a “translator”—called messenger RNA (scary science thing).

    The full-length scary science thing sequence of the Pfizer vaccine coding for the spike protein is 4,284 nucleotides in length.

    It consists of a 5′ CAP structure to prime its translation into a spike protein. It works like an ignition box of a car. At the end of the translatable region, the open reading frame, there is a stop codon, which is like a car’s brakes. If a truncated scary science thing does not contain a stop codon, it fails to give a “brake” signal. The protein translation process will continue endlessly.

    Truncated scary science thing’s missing stop codon is highly detrimental to humans. It can lead to the production of toxic protein products.
    Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Contains Truncated scary science thing

    The EMA is responsible for approving all medicinal products for human use in Europe, including drugs and vaccines. The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) is the EMA’s committee responsible for interpreting the agency’s opinions.

    In an EMA assessment report coded EMA/CHMP/448917/2021, the EMA requested that Pfizer address the impurities of its vaccine product, which the EMA report described as “truncated and modified scary science thing.”

    Pfizer’s report to the EMA clearly showed that Pfizer’s vaccine contained impurities, as indicated by “Peak 1” in the graph below, based on a screenshot from page 14 of the EMA’s August 2021 report.
  12. It was all deliberate and methodically contrived. None of it was incompetency or an accident. They knew they couldn't kill everyone at once, so they tailored the batches to suit a suppressed genocide, for their WEF handlers.
  13. Twinkie the kid Tuskegee Airman
    Oh yeah if the butchers so bad ass why are you scared of him and i'm not
  14. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ They knew they couldn't kill everyone at once

    Why would they want to?
  15. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Why would they want to?

    It's all part of the Klaus Schwab's so-called "Sustainable Development Plan". Reduce world population down to 500 million. They even tell people about it, but people are too stupid and distracted to realize it.
  16. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It's all part of the Klaus Schwab's so-called "Sustainable Development Plan". Reduce world population down to 500 million. They even tell people about it, but people are too stupid and distracted to realize it.

    Hold on, reducing is different than killing "all" which is it?
  17. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Hold on, reducing is different than killing "all" which is it?

    It's a figure of speech, dum dum.
  18. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It's a figure of speech, dum dum.

    Well no "all" is not a figure of speech for "reduced"

    There is a MASSIVE difference between the two.

    I killed all the people in the room
    well I reduced it from 100 people to 99...that's similar to all..right?

    Dumb
  19. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Well no "all" is not a figure of speech for "reduced"

    There is a MASSIVE difference between the two.

    I killed all the people in the room
    well I reduced it from 100 people to 99…that's similar to all..right?

    Dumb

    The phrase used was "they knew they couldn't kill everyone at once", "kill everyone" representing a figure of speech. You seem desperate, kid.
  20. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The phrase used was "they knew they couldn't kill everyone at once", "kill everyone" representing a figure of speech. You seem desperate, kid.

    Everyone would be all

Jump to Top