User Controls

Navigation

Niggas in Space > Oh the Humanities! > Do circles objectively exist?
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. 8
  11. 9
  12. 10

Do circles objectively exist?

  1. 2021-10-26 at 8:56 PM UTC
    #61
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready Nope.

    A bhikkhunī (Pali) or bhikṣuṇī (Sanskrit) is a fully ordained female monastic in Buddhism. Male monastics are called bhikkhus. Both bhikkhunis and bhikkhus live by the Vinaya, a set of rules.
  2. 2021-10-26 at 8:57 PM UTC
    #62
    Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    Originally posted by mmQ That's a cool Gramma I love her

    You're into Gilf porn too?
  3. 2021-10-26 at 8:57 PM UTC
    #63
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready What if one side is equal yet is inverted

    What if one side was a BUTT? it doesn't matter. I'm not taking about butts or inverted sides
  4. 2021-10-26 at 8:57 PM UTC
    #64
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready You're into Gilf porn too?

    I'm into people that have a sense of humor
  5. 2021-10-26 at 8:57 PM UTC
    #65
    mmG African Astronaut
    Originally posted by mmQ Don't patronize me lol.

    Idk what defines it? 4 equal sides I thought.

    Yeah sure. How accurately do you think you can coordinate the sizes of the sides? To within half a millimetre? A tenth of 1mm?
  6. 2021-10-26 at 8:58 PM UTC
    #66
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by mmG Yeah sure. How accurately do you think you can coordinate the sizes of the sides? To within half a millimetre? A tenth of 1mm?

    I mean digitally it would be pretty easy to make one I would think.
  7. 2021-10-26 at 9:13 PM UTC
    #67
    Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    Fuck mathematical accuracy and down to nano perfection.

    It's what the human eye sees and accepts as a whole. Unless the circle is a nano size processor required for high tech shit, a circle is as perfect as the human eye sees. Even if it's fractions of a human hair off.

    Why hasn't WWIII started yet?

    Not long from now. I'm going to visually (just taking notes) hunt PLA posing as students and buy some pot now. Will chime in later.


    There should be a phone game like picachoo or whatever it's called. I'm old; never played it.

    Virtual pew pew pew
  8. 2021-10-26 at 9:18 PM UTC
    #68
    troon African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready a circle is as perfect as the human eye sees.

    What if it's the eyes of Jiggaboo Johnson? Could be a triangle and he'd swear it's a circle.

    My browser's dictionary now includes the word jiggaboo. Neat.
  9. 2021-10-26 at 9:36 PM UTC
    #69
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready Fuck mathematical accuracy and down to nano perfection.

    It's what the human eye sees and accepts as a whole. Unless the circle is a nano size processor required for high tech shit, a circle is as perfect as the human eye sees. Even if it's fractions of a human hair off.

    Why hasn't WWIII started yet?

    Not long from now. I'm going to visually (just taking notes) hunt PLA posing as students and buy some pot now. Will chime in later.


    There should be a phone game like picachoo or whatever it's called. I'm old; never played it.

    Virtual pew pew pew

    YEAH MAN LETS ALL JUST LISTEN TO A PERFECT CIRCLE AND GET ALONG
  10. 2021-10-26 at 9:46 PM UTC
    #70
    mmG African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready Fuck mathematical accuracy and down to nano perfection.

    It's what the human eye sees and accepts as a whole. Unless the circle is a nano size processor required for high tech shit, a circle is as perfect as the human eye sees. Even if it's fractions of a human hair off.

    Why hasn't WWIII started yet?

    Not long from now. I'm going to visually (just taking notes) hunt PLA posing as students and buy some pot now. Will chime in later.


    There should be a phone game like picachoo or whatever it's called. I'm old; never played it.

    Virtual pew pew pew

    It's subjective then.
  11. 2021-10-26 at 9:46 PM UTC
    #71
    mmG African Astronaut
    Originally posted by mmQ I mean digitally it would be pretty easy to make one I would think.

    To what level of precision? Infinite?
  12. 2021-10-26 at 9:48 PM UTC
    #72
    mmG African Astronaut
    Originally posted by troon What if it's the eyes of Jiggaboo Johnson? Could be a triangle and he'd swear it's a circle.

    My browser's dictionary now includes the word jiggaboo. Neat.

    He's a gay
  13. 2021-10-26 at 9:48 PM UTC
    #73
    mmG African Astronaut
    Originally posted by mmQ YEAH MAN LETS ALL JUST LISTEN TO A PERFECT CIRCLE AND GET ALONG

    So circles don't exist objectively!
  14. 2021-10-26 at 9:52 PM UTC
    #74
    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by mmG To what level of precision? Infinite?

    No. To perfect .

    I could make a square with 4 numbers each side is 1 2 3 4
  15. 2021-10-26 at 9:54 PM UTC
    #75
    mmG African Astronaut
    Originally posted by mmQ No. To perfect .

    I could make a square with 4 numbers each side is 1 2 3 4

    How would you construct it so each side is of exactly identical length.
  16. 2021-10-26 at 9:55 PM UTC
    #76
    mmG African Astronaut
    Ah I could help you out with your argument here. I hate when this happens. You are so close to finding the right... "Thing"... To argue the point with.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. 2021-10-26 at 10:04 PM UTC
    #77
    Grylls Cum Looking Faggot [abrade this vocal tread-softly]
    What’s an annulus

    Guessing that’s where the word anus comes from now
  18. 2021-10-26 at 10:09 PM UTC
    #78
    mmG African Astronaut
    Annulingus cloud
  19. 2021-10-26 at 10:14 PM UTC
    #79
    Grylls Cum Looking Faggot [abrade this vocal tread-softly]
    Shut up you annulus
  20. 2021-10-26 at 10:15 PM UTC
    #80
    troon African Astronaut
    Originally posted by mmG How would you construct it so each side is of exactly identical length.

    I'd nail four Plancks together.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  9. 7
  10. 8
  11. 9
  12. 10
Jump to Top