User Controls

If January 6, 2021 was an insurrection then why?

  1. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Technologist Well you failed there, I went through the entire thread and WE BOTH agreed it was in the investigation stages so we did not know for sure.


    No. I pointed out that the FBI had a long history of encouraging this sort of behavior and the glaring inconsistencies in the case and as usual, you wouldn't even consider it because it wasn't the opinion of a J'ew with a toupee and a large desk.

    Originally posted by Technologist In this thread you tried to tell me racism wasn’t an issue here, that is proven wrong just about every day in our society. I will admit I was WRONG about not knowing the FBI was involved with these people.

    Again, no. I pointed out that three of the 'most serious White Supremecist groups' you listed were well-known FBI honeypots and again, you refused to consider it because you didn't know anything about the topic. When almost every major 'white supremecist organization' the media panics about is led by the FBI or other betabet agency (or in the case of The Base, intelligence contracters), it is reasonable to assert that their threat is exaggerated.

    It'd take a lot less effort for you to look at evidence objectively before asserting an opinion than to retroactively try to soften your position so you don't appear AS wrong later on.
  2. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    also lol@ go'llum in that first thread trying to argue that the FBI couldn't possibly be trying to entrap people because they're not allowed to
  3. HURR DURR THE POLICE LITERALLY SPEED TO CATCH PEOPLE it's ALLOWED by the police and FBI to break the law and fuck with people you nitwits THIS IS WHO YOU VOTED FOR

    It's not a conspiracy, they have been doing it before anyone here was born and will continue to do it long after we are all gone. It's called population control 101 paid for by your tax dollars
  4. Technologist victim of incest
    Originally posted by aldra No. I pointed out that the FBI had a long history of encouraging this sort of behavior and the glaring inconsistencies in the case and as usual, you wouldn't even consider it because it wasn't the opinion of a J'ew with a toupee and a large desk

    That is a lie, it is not the conversation I had with you.



    Again, no. I pointed out that three of the 'most serious White Supremecist groups' you listed were well-known FBI honeypots and again, you refused to consider it because you didn't know anything about the topic. When almost every major 'white supremecist organization' the media panics about is led by the FBI or other betabet agency (or in the case of The Base, intelligence contracters), it is reasonable to assert that their threat is exaggerated.

    Soooo I said I was WRONG, and you say, “again no”. Oh ok.

    You absolutely cannot prove that I’m wrong about issues consistently.

    Nice try.

    STFU, till you prove your lies. You found one time I was wrong, whoop de doo🙄
  5. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Ha. I've never been wrong about anything.
  6. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by aldra It'd take a lot less effort for you to look at evidence objectively before asserting an opinion than to retroactively try to soften your position so you don't appear AS wrong later on.
  7. Donald Trump Black Hole


    Hey Aldra, are you interested in joining our cool new militia?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. no but id like to see them practice kissing
  9. Originally posted by Speedy Parker Incorrect

  10. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    Incorrect
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. Originally posted by Speedy Parker Incorrect

    how suscinct.
  12. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny how suscinct.

    incorrect
  13. Originally posted by Speedy Parker incorrect

    ↑ ran out of witty replies again.
  14. Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Then why out of 642 individuals who have been arrested and charged (and detained without bail in many cases). has not a single one of them been charged under 18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection, 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy, or 18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government? If you don't believe that is true below is a link to a searchable table containing all 642 people and the charges against them. The word insurrection only appears once in the table, not in the charges but rather in the notes on Katherine Schwab of Texas. The notes read as follows;



    The only other reference to insurrection relating to the activities of any of the 643 individuals charged is also not in the charges but in the notes on Rachel Powell of Pennsylvania in which the prosecutor broadly labels everyone involved as insurrectionist;



    https://www.insider.com/all-the-us-capitol-pro-trump-riot-arrests-charges-names-2021-1

    Because they have not Yet. They have at least 2 years Statute of limitations to act on doing so. There is 3 and a half months to charge in the 1 year alone.
  15. Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    Originally posted by Donald Trump

    Hey Aldra, are you interested in joining our cool new militia?

    The blonde looks real young. No way is she a fed. Is this some tv sitcom?
  16. Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    Originally posted by Technologist That is a lie, it is not the conversation I had with you.





    Soooo I said I was WRONG, and you say, “again no”. Oh ok.

    You absolutely cannot prove that I’m wrong about issues consistently.

    Nice try.

    STFU, till you prove your lies. You found one time I was wrong, whoop de doo🙄

    Tech. Explain this in hospital term.

    I had a 4inch wide 5 inches long piece of iron, stabbed just under my right chest and armpit. Impaled.

    Left a hole wide and deep enough for the doctors hand


    I knicked an artery and the fat melted into the floor with blood.


    This EMT said I had a small laceration and a scratch
  17. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready Because they have not Yet. They have at least 2 years Statute of limitations to act on doing so. There is 3 and a half months to charge in the 1 year alone.

    So calling it an insurrection with no insurrectionis is propaganda.
  18. Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker So calling it an insurrection with no insurrectionis is propaganda.

    You know how that works. Corrupt media calls it in the header then insert a mild "they're suspected in the act of insurection.." and state they "never officially accused but something something .."

    I hope cnn does get sued. Radicalism left. Remember that Saigon Jane was the American Tokyo Rose aka Actress and far leftist Jane Fonda was married to CNN founder
  19. Quick Mix Ready Dark Matter [jealously defalcate my upanishad]
    It's too bad too. I had a crush on Jane Fonda! and Robert Redford seemed A'lpha male cool when blonde hair leads were "in" in the day. Both leftist and member supporters of Weather Underground Organization.


    She was hot in Barbarella.
  20. Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready The blonde looks real young. No way is she a fed. Is this some tv sitcom?

    yes. its the new x-files.
Jump to Top