User Controls

World to hit temperature tipping point 10 years faster than forecast

  1. whats the difference between sciences and pseudosciences.
  2. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny whats the difference between sciences and pseudosciences.

    One is magic, the other is lunacy.
  3. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ One is magic, the other is lunacy.

    so which one is which
  4. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny so which one is which

    Magic the former, lunacy the latter.
  5. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny whats the difference between sciences and pseudosciences.

  6. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    “We Are Going To Run Out Of Food” – 7 Reasons There’s Going To Be A Global Famine

    Even some of the most outspoken climate scientists prefer to be vague, saying things like “our way of life is in danger” or “the future looks bleak.” It’s like they’re afraid to say what they really mean: People are going to starve to death.

    And not just people on the other side of the world. People in your town. People in your neighborhood. Maybe even people in your home.
  7. D-Bonglord Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by Obbe Those who claim that this estimation is not significant or accurate may be misinformed or may be intentionally spreading misinformation. It is important to rely on scientifically valid and peer-reviewed sources of information when evaluating claims related to climate change.

    it's not a "accept this FACT trust the science"

    science is all about asking questions and proving things beyond a doubt so nobody can deny climate change which I think is fairly challegned in its validity
  8. Originally posted by D-Bonglord it's not a "accept this FACT trust the science"

    science is all about asking questions and proving things beyond a doubt so nobody can deny climate change which I think is fairly challegned in its validity

    No. The new science is you just have to go ahead and take the word of corrupt and power-starved politicians and their paid off henchpersons. That's real science now, by God.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    The statement "It is a statement of fact, we cannot be any more certain; it is unequivocal and indisputable that humans are warming the planet" is not contradictory to the idea that real science is about asking questions. In fact, science is all about asking questions and continually testing and refining our understanding of the natural world.

    The statement about human-caused climate change is based on decades of scientific research and evidence, including observations of rising temperatures, melting glaciers, and changes in weather patterns. The overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels, are causing the Earth's climate to warm at an unprecedented rate.

    While it is always possible for new evidence to emerge that could challenge our current understanding of climate change, the weight of the evidence and the degree of consensus among scientists makes the statement about human-caused climate change highly probable and reliable.

    Therefore, the idea that real science is about asking questions does not contradict the fact that certain scientific findings, such as the role of humans in warming the planet, can be considered factual based on the available evidence.
  10. Originally posted by Obbe The statement "It is a statement of fact, we cannot be any more certain; it is unequivocal and indisputable that humans are warming the planet" is not contradictory to the idea that real science is about asking questions. In fact, science is all about asking questions and continually testing and refining our understanding of the natural world.

    Can't refine something that's already settled.
  11. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Can't refine something that's already settled.

    While the scientific consensus on climate change is strong, it does not mean that our understanding of the issue cannot be refined any further. In fact, ongoing scientific research and debate are essential for advancing our understanding of climate change and developing effective strategies to address it.
  12. If you continue to refine something over and over you wear it away...
  13. Michael Myers victim of incest [divide your nonresilient tucker]
    Originally posted by Obbe Sound pretty scared.

    Copium.
  14. Originally posted by Obbe While the scientific consensus on climate change is strong, it does not mean that our understanding of the issue cannot be refined any further. In fact, ongoing scientific research and debate are essential for advancing our understanding of climate change and developing effective strategies to address it.

    Nope. Liberals like you insist the science is settled. They even arrest people, doxx them, freeze their bank accounts, trample them with horses, and fire them from their jobs if they don't accept the settled science. You can lie and gaslight and say it isn't so, but that doesn't change the fact.
  15. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ You can lie and gaslight and say it isn't so, but that doesn't change the fact.

    Ironic.
  16. Originally posted by Obbe Ironic.

    The only ironic thing about it is so-called "liberals" who weaponize science, while labelling themselves some kind of social heroes.
  17. Iconic
  18. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The only ironic thing about it is so-called "liberals" who weaponize science, while labelling themselves some kind of social heroes.

    Like who?
  19. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Magic the former, lunacy the latter.

    why are you having trouble putting science and magic in one sentence.
  20. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson

    definition challenged again ?
Jump to Top