User Controls
Ivermectin is shown to be effective against covid.
-
2021-06-28 at 7:38 PM UTCBut the big guys, WHO, FDA, youtube and google disapproves.
Recently joe rogan had bret weinstein and dr pierre kory on his podcast. It was taken down by youtube.
Bret, for those who don't know is an evolutionary biologist and dr kory is a critical care physician who's been doing alot of work with ivermectin. Bret also had his own episode removed, where he was talking about the likelihood of covid coming from wuhan.
Now, before people here start pointing out how bret is a jedi and he just wants to make money, consider this.
Ivermectin is off patent, cheap, and most medicinal companies produces and sells it. There's literally no reason to assume this is a cash crap.
Youtube censoring valid information is nothing new, but this comes down to human lives and is unacceptable.
Now, why would the big guys want to shut down alternative treatments? Its pretty obvious, moneh.
I invite you all to look into ivermectin and its effect against covid.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011
When you search google, prepare to find several cases against ivermectin. But keep in mind that there's a difference between senseless critique and actual studies.
I'll also ask you to look up bret and dr cory, although recently cory had his wikipedia profile edited to shame him.
The WHO have been trying to attack ivermectin, claiming its unsafe and dangerous.
Also, the WHO have not yet accepted covid as something that's transmittable via air. The FDA recently changed their mind on this. They now claim that it is.
The amount of stupidity is insane and the hypocrisy that these "organisations" spew out is mind boggling.
What i've learned from following this for a while is that the WHO and FDA etc is totally susceptible to outside influence, mainly from big pharma. We can't trust these organisations.
For those with spotify the JRE episode is 1671.
Here's bret's podcast on the topic
https://odysee.com/@BretWeinstein:f/COVID-Ivermectin-and-the-Crime-of-the-Century-DarkHorse-Podcast-with-Pierre-Kory-Bret-Weinstein:f
Think about it, before you get a jab that might give u cancer in 5 years.
Addendum:
I just found out that the Biden administration is investing $3.2 billion to make a new and improved ivermectin, even though the current one is already superior as a treatment. I mean, how can it be more obvious?
Lets take ivermectin and alter it slightly, patent it, and make a fortune. -
2021-06-28 at 8:52 PM UTCJoe Biden promised to cure cancer now it makes sense, because him and supreme Marxist fauchy are gonna convince ~70% + of the population to take on an added risk for it.
Reminds me of the FDAs decades long efforts against Dr. Burzynski in Texas, who has been offering supposedly successful cancer treatments which they don't like him doing -
2021-06-28 at 10:35 PM UTCI don't take anything, it all seems like fake news to me I will just keep smoking weed and wearing my mask, thanks
-
2021-06-29 at 3:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by I Live In Your Crawlspace Secretly4 Joe Biden promised to cure cancer now it makes sense, because him and supreme Marxist fauchy are gonna convince ~70% + of the population to take on an added risk for it.
Exactly. And fauchy is barely holding it together these days, he fucked up plenty of times.
Originally posted by I Live In Your Crawlspace Secretly4 Reminds me of the FDAs decades long efforts against Dr. Burzynski in Texas, who has been offering supposedly successful cancer treatments which they don't like him doing
Yeah that rings a bell.
All those people, all that unnecessary suffering and death just so big pharma + investors can git rich.
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood I don't take anything, it all seems like fake news to me I will just keep smoking weed and wearing my mask, thanks
Yeah keep doing that, but just incase you should really keep a pack of ivermectin at home for early treatment.
We all should. -
2021-06-29 at 3:21 AM UTCboth ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have had studies recently demonstrating that they're effective at treating COVID
I suspect the reason they were so disparaged up until now is that the emergency use authorisation that allows the use of the new scary science thing/adenovirus vaccines without FDA approval and testing dictates there must be no current effective treatmentThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-06-29 at 5:17 AM UTCOnly way you can get it is for horses from a veterinarian.
-
2021-06-29 at 9:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra I suspect the reason they were so disparaged up until now is that the emergency use authorisation that allows the use of the new scary science thing/adenovirus vaccines without FDA approval and testing dictates there must be no current effective treatment
Oh they dun goof'd.
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Only way you can get it is for horses from a veterinarian.
I can get it on a prescription over here.
It's the active ingredient in quite a lot of drugs, most are antiparasitic. -
2021-06-29 at 9:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have had studies recently demonstrating that they're effective at treating COVID
I suspect the reason they were so disparaged up until now is that the emergency use authorisation that allows the use of the new scary science thing/adenovirus vaccines without FDA approval and testing dictates there must be no current effective treatment
But remember how furious people like Techno were by the idea that HCQ might work? They were apoplectic about the possibility.
There is clearly something else going on.
We have really bad ash-die back going on right now. It's caused by a fungal disease, and anti-fungal chemicals will help. Yet the authorities won't recommend them, under any circumstance. The plan is to allow every single ash tree to die (some will survive).
There is some illness with these people, a desire to stop people being successful, and yes, it makes no sense to me. -
2021-06-29 at 9:56 AM UTCThe spike protein in the vaccine also appears to have negative effects on the uterus in females.
Chemical castration comes to mind.
It all makes perfect sense if you're trying to depopulate and make money while doing it. -
2021-06-29 at 11:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump But remember how furious people like Techno were by the idea that HCQ might work? They were apoplectic about the possibility.
There is clearly something else going on.
yeah I'm still cautious about hydroxy because the dose required can be dangerous so it'd probably be best kept for in-patient treatment, but it was like a religious response against blasphemy when Trump talked about it
Originally posted by Xlite The spike protein in the vaccine also appears to have negative effects on the uterus in females.
Chemical castration comes to mind.
It all makes perfect sense if you're trying to depopulate and make money while doing it.
the idea was that the coronavirus itself mutates so quickly that a regular vaccine might be ineffective in weeks-months, so the scary science thing vaccine causes your body to create just the spike proteins themselves, which allows your immune system to train against and attack them. the spike proteins don't typically mutate so quickly, and if they're destroyed the virus is unable to enter cells and much less harmful.
what they didn't realise was that the spike proteins themselves are highly dangerous when not attached to a bigger organism, that your immune system doesn't always just destroy them but 'breaks them off' from the virus, and that rather that simply being flushed out of the system they collect in various organs, most notably the spleen and ovaries.
that and the spike proteins contain protein strings in common with human placenta, meaning that it's possible (though so far it hasn't been recorded or demonstrated) the immune system can confuse the two and begin attacking placenta which would effectively render a woman infertile. this last one was brought up as a serious concern by the ex- head of vaccine development at PfizerThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-06-29 at 11:47 AM UTCto be clear I don't think there's a real 'depopulation agenda' but that doesn't mean the risks aren't real
-
2021-06-29 at 1:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra to be clear I don't think there's a real 'depopulation agenda' but that doesn't mean the risks aren't real
I don't know man. Even if there's is no plan to depop, you cannot deny the smell of bullshit.
Did you watch the podcasts?
What really concerns me is that even though people are talking about these things, the involved parties will not suffer repercussions. The government won't hold big pharma responsible. Infact, i doubt the government will even bring up these topics at all. -
2021-06-29 at 4:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by Xlite I don't know man. Even if there's is no plan to depop, you cannot deny the smell of bullshit.
Did you watch the podcasts?
What really concerns me is that even though people are talking about these things, the involved parties will not suffer repercussions. The government won't hold big pharma responsible. Infact, i doubt the government will even bring up these topics at all.
BAP is the only podcast I really like and I haven't even checked that in a while. got a link to the specific segment you're talking about? I don't like how podcasts and videos act as one big data dump, where in comparison an article or book makes it much easier to separate different claims and analyse them independently.
my belief in terms of COVID is that much of the world freaked out when China started its lockdowns, not realising that A) the virus wasn't as serious as initially believed and B) those lockdowns work in a centrally-controlled economy but are much harder to manage outside of that. it got to the point where measures to control COVID began doing serious damage and to this day nobody wants to admit that they fucked up so the response stays the same, even if it is harming people more than the virus.
in terms of the vaccines, I think it's more just about money and power than any greater ideal. they rushed scary science thing therapies to market (even attacking alternative options such as ivermectin and HQC because they stood in the way of this new 'vaccine' tech, ie. out of recklessness rather than malice) because otherwise they'd be spending a lot more time and money on long-term testing and regulatory approval. plenty of other industries, specifically logistics and refridgeration throw their political power behind it (ie. lobbying) because when new technologies like this become commonplace, entire supply chains need to be created and upgraded to support them. sure, some people like Gates and pals are following their own ideals but there can't possibly be enough people on board with large-scale death and sterilisation for it to be the 'hidden' goal of the project.
if that's what's actually happening, the people at the helm have been very cleverly compartmentalising the plan and baiting huge networks of suppliers and support companies into doing their bidding. -
2021-06-29 at 4:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra BAP is the only podcast I really like and I haven't even checked that in a while. got a link to the specific segment you're talking about? I don't like how podcasts and videos act as one big data dump, where in comparison an article or book makes it much easier to separate different claims and analyse them independently.
my belief in terms of COVID is that much of the world freaked out when China started its lockdowns, not realising that A) the virus wasn't as serious as initially believed and B) those lockdowns work in a centrally-controlled economy but are much harder to manage outside of that. it got to the point where measures to control COVID began doing serious damage and to this day nobody wants to admit that they fucked up so the response stays the same, even if it is harming people more than the virus.
in terms of the vaccines, I think it's more just about money and power than any greater ideal. they rushed scary science thing therapies to market (even attacking alternative options such as ivermectin and HQC because they stood in the way of this new 'vaccine' tech, ie. out of recklessness rather than malice) because otherwise they'd be spending a lot more time and money on long-term testing and regulatory approval. plenty of other industries, specifically logistics and refridgeration throw their political power behind it (ie. lobbying) because when new technologies like this become commonplace, entire supply chains need to be created and upgraded to support them. sure, some people like Gates and pals are following their own ideals but there can't possibly be enough people on board with large-scale death and sterilisation for it to be the 'hidden' goal of the project.
if that's what's actually happening, the people at the helm have been very cleverly compartmentalising the plan and baiting huge networks of suppliers and support companies into doing their bidding.
it wasnt really the lockdown that worked for china.
its the segregation of the untested from the tested people amd mass testing.
for really effective control people have to be treated like how products are treated in a factory, the tested, untested and rejects must be segregated and no mixing is permitted because mixing between healthy and infected individuals defeat the purpose of testing.
china had untested people locked in their houses and were prevented from coming out for whatever reasons.
the west could never do that because muh freedoom. -
2021-07-01 at 5:49 PM UTCIt turns out that one of the reasons people are suffering from the more severe side effects is because people are injecting the vaccine without aspiration. Its meant to be injected into the muscle, not the blood vessels. And if you don't pull back the plunger you will never know where the vaccine was actually injected.
-
2021-07-01 at 5:53 PM UTCIdiots injecting experimental gene therapies, when they have no clue what's in it, or what it will do to them, for a virus with a 99.97% recovery rate, and then still have to wear masks, social distance, quarantine and fully adhere to all restrictions. We really do live in Clown World now.
-
2021-07-01 at 5:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by Xlite It turns out that one of the reasons people are suffering from the more severe side effects is because people are injecting the vaccine without aspiration. Its meant to be injected into the muscle, not the blood vessels. And if you don't pull back the plunger you will never know where the vaccine was actually injected.
They don't aspire the flu vaccine, but I never got sick from that. I got sick for both pfizer shots. -
2021-07-01 at 5:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump They don't aspire the flu vaccine, but I never got sick from that. I got sick for both pfizer shots.
You can't know if they didn't aspire though. Also, there's a difference between our current vaccines and the ones a few years back.
Now i'm not a specialist, but as far as i know these scary science thing vaccines function in a different manner
Its really essential to see if u hit a vessel or not either way. -
2021-07-01 at 6:09 PM UTCHumans have never been experimented on with scary science thing gene therapies before 2020.
-
2021-07-01 at 6:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by Xlite You can't know if they didn't aspire though. Also, there's a difference between our current vaccines and the ones a few years back.
Now i'm not a specialist, but as far as i know these scary science thing vaccines function in a different manner
Its really essential to see if u hit a vessel or not either way.
This guy talks about aspiration, but only with adenovirus vaccines.
