User Controls

The Delta Strain will shut us in once again

  1. #81
    Case dismissed.
  2. #82
    I'm all for experimental vaccines, I don't really understand the science behind it. They need to spend more on advertising because literally everyone believes it's a microchip zombie virus.

    The idea of regulating an industry makes me cry. I'm not against the vaccine but I am against the government requiring you consume this commercial product to be allowed basic freedoms like association. They are ruining the free market and holding back science, for all we know there could be a better vaccine right around the corner that's cheaper and easier to make.

    But we would never know or discover it because of all the rules and regulations associated with virology and pharmacy industries which are going to be even more regulated after covid especially if it's confirmed to be lab-made.

    The global pandemic isn't the fault of globalization and international travel. The free market would have regulated themselves a lot faster than the government but the reliance on government to make the rules and "oh let's stay open we can't hurt the business like that" and then "NOPE CLOSE EVERYTHING"

    how about allowing businesses to do what they do best, running their business and leave that decision to them and the ALMIGHTY CONSUMER who can choose to not go to places that don't have mask rules or vaccine screening. Making it mandatory does nothing but perpetuate the systems that caused this in the first place.

    Society is doomed and the only solution is ECONOMIC FREEDOM!!!!!
  3. #83
    Operation WRAP SPEED was not the president giving SCIENCE money to fund vaccine research, they had the money and were already doing the research.

    The problem was a legal one. Drugs are not allowed to be "FAST TRACKED" anymore because of FDA regulations, Operation warp speed did one thing, make it legal for this specific drug to be approved without years of testing.



    There is a belief that a company is incapable of testing their own product for safety because it makes more financial sense to not test it, get the profit and just pay legal fees because you still come out in the end wealthy. There is long track record of this happening throughout history when there was little to no regulation.



    there are almost no modern examples of this happening except maybe from developing countries. Industries are mostly self regulated these days with minimal government involvement because it makes more sense for a business to not kill thousands of people in accidents if they want to stick around.
  4. #84
    I don't care if people choose not to get the vaccine, they'll be dead sooner or later.
  5. #85
    Originally posted by Chairman Takeshi Kaga scary science thing vaccines are perfectly safe and a breakthrough in medical technology that will be key in future advances. It will become a staple in disease therapy because it is heavily supported by medical science and highly effective.

    There is no evidence they are safe. And the scary science thing injections aren't vaccines, they're gene therapies.
  6. #86
    Forget the Delta Strain, the new one is the Delta+ strain.

    https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/delta-variety-could-evade-vaccine-or-infection-immunity-shahid-jameel/
  7. #87
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ There is no evidence they are safe.

    So what? Do you support FDA regulations and want to wait 2 years for the drug to be tested? This is a step in the direction of industrial freedom.

    It's not like you are being FORCED To take it... by the company LMAO
  8. #88
    Nothing is safe, the universe is out to kill you from the moment you are conceived. There are those who cower from it's mighty forces and those who don't cook their chicken to 145F as recommended.

    Which camp do you want to pitch your tent in...pass the hot sauce...
  9. #89
    That wild bird isn't safe.
    That dog isn't safe.
    That starved bear isn't safe.
  10. #90
    The government has no problem forcing us with laws to take the vaccine and wear a mask but companies don't enforce laws. They can use advertising and appealing to emotions and guilt tripping, essentially replacing the role of social media and journalism which have been taken over by the government NO FAKE COVID NEWS ALLOWED

    I honestly don't see the difference between a PFIZER PUBLIC HEALTH MEDIA OUTLET telling me to wash my hands and wear a mask versus the government doing it.

    People respond a lot better to voluntary requests than fines and criminal punishment. I doubt there would have ever been an anti mask or anti vax movement if the government never got involved

  11. #91
    Paranoia...

    If the gov wanted you dead, you'd already be dead. They don't need to come up with a vaccine program to kill the masses off...they'd just dump it in the water supply, food supply etc etc.
  12. #92
    What is being offered to take the experimental vaccine:

    Donuts
    Candy
    T-shirts and hats
    Game tickets
    Cash lotteries


    What isn't being offered to take the experimental vaccine:

    Peer-reviewed safety studies.
  13. #93
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ What is being offered to take the experimental vaccine:

    Donuts
    Candy
    T-shirts and hats
    Game tickets
    Cash lotteries


    What isn't being offered to take the experimental vaccine:

    Peer-reviewed safety studies.

    Lets be honest here...cash candy and donuts sounds better than saftey studies
  14. #94
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Paranoia…

    If the gov wanted you dead, you'd already be dead. They don't need to come up with a vaccine program to kill the masses off…they'd just dump it in the water supply, food supply etc etc.

    There's no profit associated with that. Always follow the money.
  15. #95
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ There's no profit associated with that. Always follow the money.

    If you reduce the population by 70% your long term financial prospects (re: how many people you can tax) is greatly reduced...long term. A short term cash injection from vaccines is a drop in the contaminated ocean compared to the money you'd be losing overall.

    Follow the math and logic
  16. #96
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Paranoia…

    If the gov wanted you dead, you'd already be dead. They don't need to come up with a vaccine program to kill the masses off…they'd just dump it in the water supply, food supply etc etc.

    your childish if you think the government thinks about you as an individeal or as a part of the statistic.

    to them, you never crossed their minds.
  17. #97
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson If you reduce the population by 70% your long term financial prospects (re: how many people you can tax) is greatly reduced…long term. A short term cash injection from vaccines is a drop in the contaminated ocean compared to the money you'd be losing overall.

    Follow the math and logic



    government doesnt rely on your tax money for their expenditures.

    havent you watch tucker carlson.
  18. #98
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson If you reduce the population by 70% your long term financial prospects (re: how many people you can tax) is greatly reduced…long term. A short term cash injection from vaccines is a drop in the contaminated ocean compared to the money you'd be losing overall.

    Follow the math and logic

    No, with less population you can print more money with no inflation.
  19. #99
    The companies that make these drugs are bold and confident enough in their skills that they believe they can introduce a product into the market without testing and not kill thousands of people.

    Maybe this will turn us all into zombies but if nothing happens in 5 years this will be hailed as a success, why do we need peer reviewed studies when we have SCIENCE.

    The only way to learn is by making a mistake. If you live in fear of another mistake you will never GROW and EVOLVE and understand the universe better.

    This is why NOT FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION research chemical drugs are so popular because people are willing to take it and sacrifice themselves for the betterment of scientific research.

  20. Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ No, with less population you can print more money with no inflation.

    bitcoin solves that problem
Jump to Top