User Controls
THE MAGA PARTY!,,, the GOP is dead, republicans are going down with the dems,, get ready for THE MAGA PARTY lefty's
-
2021-11-10 at 1:11 AM UTC
-
2021-11-10 at 1:29 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist You do realize that this “trend” has only started spiking in October, and is ongoing. It’s not some study. You know, recognizing patterns😁
Oops, I just reread this. The trend I’m speaking of is in STL’s article. I just realized it might be confusing since I quoted your article.
when the data is so random, it becomes easy to make a claim like that when you can arbitrarily decide which 'red' and 'blue' states are included in the comparison
is there a link to the study or methodology they used? -
2021-11-10 at 6:31 AM UTC
-
2021-11-10 at 6:36 AM UTC
-
2021-11-10 at 6:50 AM UTCNewsweek
Ann Coulter Calls Donald Trump 'Abjectly Stupid'
Brendan Cole
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter has accused former President Donald Trump of "betraying" his base and being "abjectly stupid" in his inability to deliver on his promise to build a border wall.
Coulter, who is very critical of the Democrats, took aim at Trump for being "stupid."
Although Coulter wrote the bestseller In Trump We Trust, E Pluribus Awesome! ahead of the 2016 presidential campaign, the right-wing firebrand has become ever more critical of the former president.
In an interview on Andrew Sullivan's Dishcast on November 5, Coulter said she knew what Trump's character was like before he was elected but supported him anyway because of his immigration policy and pledge to build the wall on the southern U.S. border.
"I was well familiar with what a narcissistic, ridiculous, tacky, vulgar, arriviste this guy was," she told Sullivan. "That I knew about. The one thing I underestimated, in fact, did not see at all is, I had no idea how abjectly stupid the man is."
She accused Trump of "not keeping his promises" and "directly betraying his base," which consisted of people who were "Americans waiting their whole lives for someone to care about them."
She said that during 2016, when promoting In Trump We Trust, journalists would tell her: "'Oh he's not really going to build the wall,'" she said. "I'd laugh and say, 'No the one thing he's got to do is build the wall.'
"My theory was if he doesn't build the wall, he loses reelection. He didn't build the wall, he lost reelection," she said. "I just couldn't imagine anyone could be so stupid to run on one thing and just not do it."
Coulter's criticism of Trump increased during the course of his presidency and since he left office.
In 2018, she criticized Trump for his attacks on his then attorney general, Jeff Sessions, who she said was the "one person" in his administration "who did anything about immigration."
In May 2020, she called Trump "the most disloyal actual retard that has ever set foot in the Oval Office" after the former president called for Alabama voters to "not trust Jeff Sessions" and instead back Sessions' GOP Senate seat challenger, Tommy Tuberville.
She also bashed the former president for seeking Space Force funding instead of focusing on building the barrier along the Mexican frontier.
"Instead of building a wall to protect this country, at least maybe we'll be able to go settle a new planet," Coulter tweeted. However, in March 2019, Trump dismissed Coulter as a "wacky nut job" in a tweet in which he said: "I am winning on the border."
In August 2021, Coulter praised President Joe Biden for "keeping a promise Trump made, but then abandoned when he got to office" in withdrawing U.S. military troops from Afghanistan. -
2021-11-10 at 6:56 AM UTC
-
2021-11-10 at 10:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by stl1 Newsweek
Ann Coulter Calls Donald Trump 'Abjectly Stupid'
Brendan Cole
Conservative pundit Ann Coulter has accused former President Donald Trump of "betraying" his base and being "abjectly stupid" in his inability to deliver on his promise to build a border wall.
Coulter, who is very critical of the Democrats, took aim at Trump for being "stupid."
Although Coulter wrote the bestseller In Trump We Trust, E Pluribus Awesome! ahead of the 2016 presidential campaign, the right-wing firebrand has become ever more critical of the former president.
In an interview on Andrew Sullivan's Dishcast on November 5, Coulter said she knew what Trump's character was like before he was elected but supported him anyway because of his immigration policy and pledge to build the wall on the southern U.S. border.
"I was well familiar with what a narcissistic, ridiculous, tacky, vulgar, arriviste this guy was," she told Sullivan. "That I knew about. The one thing I underestimated, in fact, did not see at all is, I had no idea how abjectly stupid the man is."
She accused Trump of "not keeping his promises" and "directly betraying his base," which consisted of people who were "Americans waiting their whole lives for someone to care about them."
She said that during 2016, when promoting In Trump We Trust, journalists would tell her: "'Oh he's not really going to build the wall,'" she said. "I'd laugh and say, 'No the one thing he's got to do is build the wall.'
"My theory was if he doesn't build the wall, he loses reelection. He didn't build the wall, he lost reelection," she said. "I just couldn't imagine anyone could be so stupid to run on one thing and just not do it."
Coulter's criticism of Trump increased during the course of his presidency and since he left office.
In 2018, she criticized Trump for his attacks on his then attorney general, Jeff Sessions, who she said was the "one person" in his administration "who did anything about immigration."
In May 2020, she called Trump "the most disloyal actual retard that has ever set foot in the Oval Office" after the former president called for Alabama voters to "not trust Jeff Sessions" and instead back Sessions' GOP Senate seat challenger, Tommy Tuberville.
She also bashed the former president for seeking Space Force funding instead of focusing on building the barrier along the Mexican frontier.
"Instead of building a wall to protect this country, at least maybe we'll be able to go settle a new planet," Coulter tweeted. However, in March 2019, Trump dismissed Coulter as a "wacky nut job" in a tweet in which he said: "I am winning on the border."
In August 2021, Coulter praised President Joe Biden for "keeping a promise Trump made, but then abandoned when he got to office" in withdrawing U.S. military troops from Afghanistan.
Ann broke my heart when she turned on me. -
2021-11-10 at 12:49 PM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-11-10 at 3:21 PM UTCSTD1 and Ann both missed the part where rino's and dems fought him tooth and nail in congress for 4 years over foot of the wall he did build.
-
2021-11-10 at 4:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker STD1 and Ann both missed the part where rino's and dems fought him tooth and nail in congress for 4 years over foot of the wall he did build.
they wouldnt have fought him if he was strong.
they fought him because weaknesses permeate thru all of his bodily orrifficesses.
he could have easily get secret servive to deal with his opponents but he didnt.
because he was, and still is, UUEAK. -
2021-11-11 at 12:08 AM UTC
-
2021-11-11 at 12:14 AM UTC
-
2021-11-11 at 12:16 AM UTCMay they
All
Give
A great big "FUCK YOU" to Rump
Federal Judge Refuses Trump Request to Block Jan. 6 Records
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan said that President Joe Biden had the authority to waive executive privilege over the documents despite Trump’s assertions otherwise.
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge rejected former President Donald Trump’s request to block the release of documents to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
In denying a preliminary injunction, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan said Tuesday that Congress had a strong public interest in obtaining records that could shed light on a violent insurrection mounted by the former president’s supporters. She added that President Joe Biden had the authority to waive executive privilege over the documents despite Trump’s assertions otherwise.
Barring a court order, the National Archives plans to turn over Trump’s records to the committee by Friday. But Trump’s lawyers swiftly promised an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The case probably will eventually head to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“At bottom, this is a dispute between a former and incumbent President,” Chutkan wrote. “And the Supreme Court has already made clear that in such circumstances, the incumbent’s view is accorded greater weight.”
Trump “does not acknowledge the deference owed” to Biden’s judgment as the current president, Chutkan said. She noted examples of past presidents declining to assert executive privilege and rejected what she said was Trump’s claim that executive privilege “exists in perpetuity.”
“Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President,” she said.
According to an earlier court filing from the archives, the records include call logs, drafts of remarks and speeches and handwritten notes from Trump’s then-chief of staff, Mark Meadows. There are also copies of talking points from then-press secretary Kayleigh McEnany and “a draft Executive Order on the topic of election integrity,” the National Archives has said.
Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., who leads the House committee, said in a statement after the ruling that the records are crucial for understanding the attack and “in my view, there couldn’t be a more compelling public interest than getting answers about an attack on our democracy.”
On CNN, Thompson said Trump should stop behaving like a “spoiled brat.”
The nine-member committee is investigating not just Trump’s conduct on Jan. 6 — when he told a rally to “fight like hell” shortly before rioters overran law enforcement — but his efforts in the months before the riot to challenge election results or obstruct a peaceful transfer of power. The committee has interviewed more than 150 witnesses and issued more than 30 subpoenas, including ones announced Tuesday to McEnany and former top White House adviser Stephen Miller. It is unclear whether the lawmakers will eventually seek to have Trump testify.
Trump has attacked the committee’s work and continued to promote unfounded conspiracy theories about widespread fraud in the election, despite the fact that Biden’s victory was certified by all 50 states and his claims have been rebuked by courts across the country.
In suing to block the National Archives from turning over documents, Trump called the House committee’s request a “vexatious, illegal fishing expedition” that was “untethered from any legitimate legislative purpose.” Allowing the House to get access to his records would also damage executive privilege for future presidents, Trump’s lawyers argued.
But Chutkan said the “the public interest lies in permitting — not enjoining — the combined will of the legislative and executive branches to study the events that led to and occurred on January 6, and to consider legislation to prevent such events from ever occurring again.”
Trump spokesperson Taylor Budowich tweeted late Tuesday that the case “was destined to be decided by the Appellate Courts.” He added that “Trump remains committed to defending the Constitution & the Office of the Presidency, & will be seeing this process through.”
The White House said Chutkan’s opinion “is consistent with what the President has already said” about the riot. “It is absolutely vital for there to be a full accounting of the events on that day to ensure that something like that never happens again,” spokesman Mike Gwin said. -
2021-11-11 at 12:34 AM UTCTRUMP WON! he is this country's greatest president in the last 100 yearsThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-11-11 at 12:34 AM UTC
-
2021-11-11 at 12:35 AM UTC
-
2021-11-11 at 12:59 AM UTC
-
2021-11-11 at 1:07 AM UTC
-
2021-11-11 at 6:42 AM UTCJudge rejects another Trump attempt to slow down documents from going to House January 6 committee
By Katelyn Polantz, CNN Reporter, Crime and Justice
A federal judge on Wednesday night said she would not help former President Donald Trump as he attempts to buy time in his argument to keep secret records from his presidency, pointing him instead to an appeals court to seek help.
Judge Tanya Chutkan's latest decision comes a day after she ruled against Trump in a historic case regarding access to records from his presidency sought by the House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the US Capitol.
Trump, the judge said, cannot "do an end run around" her decisions to try to win the case by forcing a delay, just because he's appealing.
Chutkan has stood by her decision that documents from Trump's presidency should be given to the House panel. She also found that Trump, as a former President, cannot claim the documents are covered by executive privilege, when the current President supports their release.
With the National Archives set to send records to the House on Friday, Trump is scrambling in court for even a temporary hold.
Chutkan declined to grant the pause, dealing the former President his second loss in two days. That means Trump will now need to ask an appeals court for emergency help to keep the documents secret while he pursues appeals.
Neither of the rulings from the federal district judge so far "triggers the harm he alleges because the Archivist will not submit the requested records to the Select Committee until November 12, 2021, and Plaintiff can seek appellate relief in the interim," Chutkan wrote Wednesday night. "This court will not effectively ignore its own reasoning in denying injunctive relief in the first place to grant injunctive relief now."
Trump has not yet asked the DC Circuit Court of Appeals for help, though he has begun the appeals process.
Short of a court order, the Archives will turn over more than 40 pages on Friday related to January 6, including White House visitor and call logs and three handwritten memos from the files of ex-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.
In all, Trump is looking to hold off the Archives from giving the House hundreds more pages later in November, as the House pushes to speak to close advisers in his White House under subpoena.
The Biden administration and the House select committee have opposed delays Trump is lobbying for in court.
The House committee wrote on Wednesday that it needs the Trump White House records quickly so it can continue investigating the attack on Congress.
"The potential harm to the public is immense: Our democratic institutions and a core feature of our democracy — the peaceful transfer of power — are at stake. Any delay will seriously hinder the Select Committee's ability to timely complete a comprehensive investigation and recommend effective remedial legislation," the committee wrote.
In another filing to Chutkan, the Biden administration said Trump, as the former President, "has no personal interest in the records," and that the Biden White House's decision to allow these presidential records to go to Congress should stand.
"The public interest weighs heavily in favor of furthering the Government's business in a prompt and full investigation of the events of January 6," administration lawyers wrote. -
2021-11-11 at 6:58 AM UTC
