User Controls

Are you ready for the FACTCHECKING?

  1. #21
    You've said you're 300lbs before. You're in the largest (pun intended) risk group. The covid will get you eventually.
  2. #22
    Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace It's for the public good, as evidenced by hard science.

    Wheres the hard science that distinguishes covid from the common flu?
  3. #23
    Originally posted by Kev Wheres the hard science that distinguishes covid from the common flu?

    I've posted it dozens of times before. The death rate is a multitude of times higher. Unless you think THE WHOLE WORLD is working together on doctoring numbers... Which you probably do. Everything is a conspiracy for you delusional conservatives.
  4. #24
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace It's for the public good, as evidenced by hard science.

    if more people died this world would be a better place
  5. #25
    Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace I've posted it dozens of times before. The death rate is a multitude of times higher. Unless you think THE WHOLE WORLD is working together on doctoring numbers… Which you probably do. Everything is a conspiracy for you delusional conservatives.

    The WHO isnt the world and yes they are doctoring numbers, they dont calculate the rate the same way they calculate the annual flu fatalities. they only count those showing symptoms as infected (inflates the death rate by 20-30 times) and then dont distinguish preexisting conditions from the real cause of death (inflates the death rate by 10-100 times).
    so the WHO is exaggerating the number of deaths by up to 30000 times more than the real number.

    there is no mass death, there is no apocalypse, the hospitals are all half empty.

    calm your dramatic faggot ass down.
  6. #26
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood if more people died this world would be a better place

    Nah our current infrastructure would crumble without enough people. I remember there was a documentary on it years ago. We'd lose experts and have trouble filling positions. Like a brain drain but for the whole world. Basic systems would fail if even a small portion of the population were missing. Like imagine your water shutting down because the dude working the plant wasn't trained enough. Entire towns would just de populate and people would have to move elsewhere.

    Would be horrific. Check the plague for a good example. It took society hundreds of years to recover. It also took hundreds of years before some people started building enough herd immunity for it to fuck off so lol. People who believe in herd immunity being a viable strategy are just retarded. Where's our Polio, swine flu, and ebola immunity?
  7. #27
    Originally posted by Kev The WHO isnt the world and yes they are doctoring numbers, they dont calculate the rate the same way they calculate the annual flu fatalities. they only count those showing symptoms as infected (inflates the death rate by 20-30 times) and then dont distinguish preexisting conditions from the real cause of death (inflates the death rate by 10-100 times).
    so the WHO is exaggerating the number of deaths by up to 30000 times more than the real number.

    there is no mass death, there is no apocalypse, the hospitals are all half empty.

    calm your dramatic faggot ass down.

    Yep. I knew you'd have a crackpot conspiracy. I only skimmed your post. Its not worth reading in whole.

    I didn't mention WHO...
  8. #28
    Meikai Heck This Schlong
    Originally posted by Kev The WHO isnt the world

    >the world health organization isn't the world (health organization)
    >194 member states
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. #29
    Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Yep. I knew you'd have a crackpot conspiracy. I only skimmed your post. Its not worth reading in whole.

    I didn't mention WHO…

    i did mention them, because their falsified numbers are the source of your confusion. you couldnt produce the hard science when i asked you to.
  10. #30
    Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by Meikai >the world health organization isn't the world (health organization)
    >194 member states

    they are a jedimerica institution, just like the UN, they represent their master, not the world.
    just like the league of nations was really germany.
  11. #31
    Originally posted by Kev i did mention them, because their falsified numbers are the source of your confusion. you couldnt produce the hard science when i asked you to.

    What do you mean? I already did.
  12. #32
    Originally posted by Kev they are a jedimerica institution, just like the UN, they represent their master, not the world.

    Oh, and who is their master? The j3ws or the mole people?
  13. #33
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Nah our current infrastructure would crumble without enough people. I remember there was a documentary on it years ago. We'd lose experts and have trouble filling positions. Like a brain drain but for the whole world. Basic systems would fail if even a small portion of the population were missing. Like imagine your water shutting down because the dude working the plant wasn't trained enough. Entire towns would just de populate and people would have to move elsewhere.

    Would be horrific. Check the plague for a good example. It took society hundreds of years to recover. It also took hundreds of years before some people started building enough herd immunity for it to fuck off so lol. People who believe in herd immunity being a viable strategy are just retarded. Where's our Polio, swine flu, and ebola immunity?

    The current infrastructure promotes the destruction of the environment so I would not cry if it all crumbled. There are too many people in this world that would rather drive 1km to the store than walk there and then people wonder why Americans are all so fat.

    It's a finite vital resource being wasted by people getting big gulps and hot dogs.
  14. #34
    Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace What do you mean? I already did.

    you have me confused with someone else, because you have not.
  15. #35
    Originally posted by Kev you have me confused with someone else, because you have not.

    Nope I did. I am not posting the numbers again. Its infected significantly less people while killing a multitude of times more. Use whatever numbers you want. The facts don't change. I'm not here to convince you. You have to do your own research.
  16. #36
    Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Nope I did. I am not posting the numbers again. Its infected significantly less people while killing a multitude of times more. Use whatever numbers you want. The facts don't change. I'm not here to convince you. You have to do your own research.

    already did, you did not address the discrepancies i brought up.
  17. #37
    Originally posted by Kev already did, you did not address the discrepancies i brought up.

    Because I don't care about you
  18. #38
    Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Because I don't care about you

    well, looks like i win this one. too easy.
  19. #39
    Originally posted by Kev well, looks like i win this one. too easy.

    Sure, kid.
  20. #40
    Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood The current infrastructure promotes the destruction of the environment so I would not cry if it all crumbled. There are too many people in this world that would rather drive 1km to the store than walk there and then people wonder why Americans are all so fat.

    It's a finite vital resource being wasted by people getting big gulps and hot dogs.

    walking produces more greenhouse gas than driving. im afraid you are the waste of resources here.

    "Researchers estimate that, in a country with high calorie diets such as the UK, walking for one kilometre would require food that would have generated around 0.26kg of carbon dioxide compared with 0.21kg of CO2 for the petrol used by a car."

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8412477/Walking-work-BAD-environment-makes-eat-new-study-shows.html
Jump to Top