2020-09-26 at 2:20 AM UTC
Antinatalism is a fine thing. Truly, the act of bringing new life into this world is a heinous thing. A pure act of selfishness and weakness driven by humanity's spineless inability to resist the genetic urge to reproduce. Nobody has a baby for the sake of the baby. To devote oneself philosophically to a path that aims to reduce the amount of suffering in this world by preventing new creatures from entering into it is a noble thing. But this only addresses new life...
What of the old life? Established life? Things that are already here, living?
I propose a new school of thought: antivitalism. Life is a plague. A corruption of the inherent beauty of the purely mechanical, physical universe. It should not exist. Its existence in this universe is wrong, abhorrent, and this fundamental incompatibility lies at the root of all suffering. Humanity should dedicate itself to the eradication of all life, everywhere, ending finally with itself once our role as The Annihilator is complete. We are, conveniently, already well on the path to this assuming that life only exists in this one place. Anthropogenic factors are at the heart of an ongoing mass extinction event - this should not be "rectified" by the so called "green", life-loving peaceniks. Indeed, this should be lauded as one of our greatest and finest accomplishments. The presence of life in this reality is like so much excrement on God's finest china. I therefore posit that that is the great evil which should be rectified posthaste.
Thank you. That is all.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2020-09-26 at 2:30 AM UTC
You're just writing this because Scrons hot cum can't make your asshole pregnant
2020-09-26 at 2:41 AM UTC
Originally posted by rabbitweed
You're just writing this because Scrons hot cum can't make your asshole pregnant
It's not like I was born sterile or gay - I could have created life at one point, and enjoyed the process. Indeed, at times, I even desired that (in my naivety). You may want to consider that you have your cause and your effect backwards - that I am as I am now because of my philosophical convictions, rather than the other way around. Do remember that all I am now, and all that I have become, has been
by choice.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2020-09-26 at 2:46 AM UTC
Nil
African Astronaut
[the overexcited four-footed chanar]
Originally posted by Meikai
by choice.
Yea rite, freewill?? What's nxt unicorns?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2020-09-26 at 3:34 AM UTC
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
seems redundant
life has a use-by date, it needs procreation to continue
if you stop procreating that's a countdown to the end
2020-09-26 at 11:08 AM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2020-09-26 at 1:15 PM UTC
Sudo
Black Hole
[my hereto riemannian peach]
Is it bad I wanna impregnate froggy thick thighs? Is that what Alex Jones was warning us about? Procreation is biologically hardwired into people, even cheap chinese cant keep their legs closed. To take out the carbon footprint requires a lotta creative destruction that is hard to convince yourself of. I'm not saying you are wrong but its an uphill battle if you want to convince people to be selfless. I wish humans were just one iota better people.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
