2016-04-25 at 5:46 AM UTC
I was about to post something about how your question is unrelated to the argument but as I was doing so I found the connection. Excuse my drunkenness and please pardon any gramatical mistakes I make make and the potential word/idea salad that may ensue.
What you are trying to do is gear my argument away from homosexuals explicitly and reign it in to any sexual relationship that will inherently fail to produce offspring, no? In reality I must inherently be a hypocrite if I say that heterosex without production is not preferable given the fact that I have pursued intercourse not as a means of production. But we must remember that we are beings capable of a higher thought and this higher thought can lead to depravity. Perhaps a point that must be considered is that non-productive sex can play an important role in the bonding between two mates. Now it is important that I used the term mates because we can describe mates as two individuals capable of the mating ritual and its subsequent (or the antecedent considering the time frame) child rearing potential.
Thank you O mighty nigger faggot for your wisdom. When I incur a less drunken state and meditate upon the subject I shall revise my argument and come back with something that shall be more substantial and logically consistent. I praise your wisdom and kindness in responding to what you thought to be a thread seeking keks and I look forward to engaging you in the next round when it occurs.
For now I must, regrettably, admit that my argument was not an end all be all and that it must be revised in order to reach the conclusion I am seeking. This does not mean that I admit any inherent flaw in my original argument other than the necessary and foreseeable flaws of a rough draft but rather that I must expand the original draft to fit the criticism of my opposition.
Of course if I am completely wrong on each and every count I have visited in this post you must simply respond with a polite "Fuck off faggot" and I will indeed understand the sentiment.
2016-05-01 at 3:24 PM UTC
Obbe
Alan What?
[annoy my right-angled speediness]
Bump to see debate continue.
