User Controls

Dump idiot Trump

  1. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by iam_asiam68 i will say this much, when DH was coming to its end, whatever i wrong over, i tried to make sure it was known and that i was sorry.

    so, if i am wrong here, i will admit to it.

    but show me specifically where i am wrong in this general statement:

    bush made agreement in 2011 to evacuate all troops from iraq.
    and yet, in 2020, we have troops there to which iran fired upon.
    so clearly, obama did not go along with the bush' agreement concerning 2011.

    you can say obama did not break the agreement or that it was voted to remain or whatever.
    i will say i am wrong for stating that incorrectly.
    but, who did iran bomb just a day ago?
    where were those troops located at?
    it seems to me, somewhere in 2011, a decision was made to not end the agreement bush had in place.
    and we kept troops in iraq.

    in my comprehension, the one who chose to not follow bush' agreement to evacuate troops in iraq, but to leave them, is now responsible for us having troops in iraq after 2011.

    Bush made that decision knowing it would not take place under his watch. In other words it was a ruse man, Wake up. Why do you think W talks shit about Trump? Hint, it's not because he made brother Jeb look like a buffoon.
  2. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Bush made that decision knowing it would not take place under his watch. In other words it was a ruse man, Wake up. Why do you think W talks shit about Trump? Hint, it's not because he made brother Jeb look like a buffoon.

    so be it, he still made the agreement.
  3. Wasn't it Obama who also said one of the first things he was going to do was shut down Gitmo?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Wasn't it Obama who also said one of the first things he was going to do was shut down Gitmo?

    he did
  5. Originally posted by iam_asiam68 he did

    but didn't...lolol
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    exactly
  7. itybit African Astronaut [daze my amino pe-tsai]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Wasn't it Obama who also said one of the first things he was going to do was shut down Gitmo?

    LOL we're talking about Iraq, but still luv ya Jiggy
  8. Originally posted by itybit LOL we're talking about Iraq, but still luv ya Jiggy

    That's the beauty of conversation...tangents. Whining about presidential decisions Bush and Trump make when the "other" guys made even more fucked up ones.

    To Err is human etc.

    As I said before no matter how bad Trump could be/is...shit would have been FAR worse under Hillary.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. itybit African Astronaut [daze my amino pe-tsai]
    Agreed, however I wasn't whining, I was just correcting a misleading statement from Iam
  10. Originally posted by itybit Agreed, however I wasn't whining, I was just correcting a misleading statement from Iam

    I wasn't saying you were dear...I was referencing those in the thread who have been ;) kissy kiss kiss.
  11. It's one thing after another with the dems...they attack Trump, they lose, they move on to the next attack strategy...it's gone fucking quiet about the impeachment huh...
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  12. itybit African Astronaut [daze my amino pe-tsai]
  13. itybit African Astronaut [daze my amino pe-tsai]
    But it was the same thing the Republicans did with Obama and even still do everything is Obama's fault. It's the nature of politics and the two party systems I suppose, it'd be nice if thing would stop being so polarized and more moderates were elected so something could get accomplished.
  14. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by itybit Agreed, however I wasn't whining, I was just correcting a misleading statement from Iam

    why is it misleading?

    he still kept troops there.
    do you think those troops were unarmed?
    all soldiers must go through basic training, so, are you claiming these soldiers were not capable of combat?
  15. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    there is no such thing as a non combative soldier.
    even 4 star general and all brass were trained to kill the enemy.
  16. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    even medics carry guns while operating on their own teammates.
  17. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    which soldiers were non combative that obama placed in iraq after removing the combative ones?
  18. Originally posted by itybit But it was the same thing the Republicans did with Obama and even still do everything is Obama's fault. It's the nature of politics and the two party systems I suppose, it'd be nice if thing would stop being so polarized and more moderates were elected so something could get accomplished.

    Yep, two Wongs don't make a White though...ask Vinny.
  19. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    and why the fuck are you buying the term, non combative soldiers, to begin with?
  20. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    you are buying a bullshit term:

    The Non-Combatant Corps (NCC) was a corps of the British Army composed of conscientious objectors as privates, with NCOs and officers seconded from other corps or regiments.
    Non-Combatant Corps - Wikipedia
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Combatant_Corps

    this is the united states army, not the british!!

    we don't have non combative soldiers!!
Jump to Top