User Controls
So i told my GF i am attracted to little girls the other day.
-
2019-08-05 at 6:55 AM UTC
-
2019-08-05 at 7:21 AM UTCI'm surprised you two haven't made babbies yet
-
2019-08-05 at 7:22 AM UTCnigger
-
2019-08-05 at 9:11 AM UTC
-
2019-08-05 at 11:35 AM UTCPics?
-
2019-08-05 at 11:43 AM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-08-05 at 11:45 AM UTChad you and your gf made a baby the time this post was made she'd be 4 already.
mmmmm. 4YOs. -
2019-08-05 at 12:07 PM UTCBump FTW
-
2019-08-05 at 12:36 PM UTC
-
2019-08-05 at 1:42 PM UTCYou called yourself a hebe in this post, but you usually call yourself a pedo WTFFF????
-
2019-08-05 at 1:43 PM UTC
-
2019-08-05 at 2:10 PM UTC
-
2019-08-05 at 2:20 PM UTC
-
2019-08-05 at 2:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country They're basically the same thing.
No they're not. It's an important distinction. One has an attraction to the budding sexually mature and able to breed, and the other to literal children. I'd say most people are some level of hebephile. There used to be a saying, "look but don't touch". I'm sure everyone here has seen some older looking teenager in public and been attracted to them without realizing their age. Nature doesn't stop people from being attracted to people under some arbitrary age.
Hebephiles are simply one step below and find pubescent teenagers to be attractive. People who can biologically have sex.
I think actual pedophilia is faaaar more disgusting, as the humam mind isn't meant to find any of those features attractive. It's a lot more predatory. You might be able to manipulate a 14yo into yes, consenting (not that it's moral) but a 5 year old? They have no sex drive whatsoever. Any "consent" is pure and utter manipulation and brainwashing.
Both are immoral to act upon but I'd say pedophilia is several degrees more fucked up. Something is severely wrong with you if you are attracted to pre-pubescant children and toddlers, it's not just some blurred line at that point. It goes against fundamental human nature. -
2019-08-05 at 3:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by G4LM No they're not. It's an important distinction. One has an attraction to the budding sexually mature and able to breed, and the other to literal children. I'd say most people are some level of hebephile. There used to be a saying, "look but don't touch". I'm sure everyone here has seen some older looking teenager in public and been attracted to them without realizing their age. Nature doesn't stop people from being attracted to people under some arbitrary age.
Hebephiles are simply one step below and find pubescent teenagers to be attractive. People who can biologically have sex.
I think actual pedophilia is faaaar more disgusting, as the humam mind isn't meant to find any of those features attractive. It's a lot more predatory. You might be able to manipulate a 14yo into yes, consenting (not that it's moral) but a 5 year old? They have no sex drive whatsoever. Any "consent" is pure and utter manipulation and brainwashing.
Both are immoral to act upon but I'd say pedophilia is several degrees more fucked up. Something is severely wrong with you if you are attracted to pre-pubescant children and toddlers, it's not just some blurred line at that point. It goes against fundamental human nature.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-08-05 at 3:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by G4LM No they're not. It's an important distinction. One has an attraction to the budding sexually mature and able to breed, and the other to literal children. I'd say most people are some level of hebephile. There used to be a saying, "look but don't touch". I'm sure everyone here has seen some older looking teenager in public and been attracted to them without realizing their age. Nature doesn't stop people from being attracted to people under some arbitrary age.
Hebephiles are simply one step below and find pubescent teenagers to be attractive. People who can biologically have sex.
I think actual pedophilia is faaaar more disgusting, as the humam mind isn't meant to find any of those features attractive. It's a lot more predatory. You might be able to manipulate a 14yo into yes, consenting (not that it's moral) but a 5 year old? They have no sex drive whatsoever. Any "consent" is pure and utter manipulation and brainwashing.
Both are immoral to act upon but I'd say pedophilia is several degrees more fucked up. Something is severely wrong with you if you are attracted to pre-pubescant children and toddlers, it's not just some blurred line at that point. It goes against fundamental human nature.
I think hebephilia is more "mentally or evolutionarily normal" than homosexuality or attraction to ladyboys -
2019-08-05 at 4:21 PM UTC
-
2019-08-05 at 4:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by G4LM No they're not. It's an important distinction. One has an attraction to the budding sexually mature and able to breed, and the other to literal children. I'd say most people are some level of hebephile. There used to be a saying, "look but don't touch". I'm sure everyone here has seen some older looking teenager in public and been attracted to them without realizing their age. Nature doesn't stop people from being attracted to people under some arbitrary age.
Hebephiles are simply one step below and find pubescent teenagers to be attractive. People who can biologically have sex.
I think actual pedophilia is faaaar more disgusting, as the humam mind isn't meant to find any of those features attractive. It's a lot more predatory. You might be able to manipulate a 14yo into yes, consenting (not that it's moral) but a 5 year old? They have no sex drive whatsoever. Any "consent" is pure and utter manipulation and brainwashing.
Both are immoral to act upon but I'd say pedophilia is several degrees more fucked up. Something is severely wrong with you if you are attracted to pre-pubescant children and toddlers, it's not just some blurred line at that point. It goes against fundamental human nature.
Originally posted by G4LM No they're not. It's an important distinction. One has an attraction to the budding sexually mature and able to breed, and the other to literal children. I'd say most people are some level of hebephile. There used to be a saying, "look but don't touch". I'm sure everyone here has seen some older looking teenager in public and been attracted to them without realizing their age. Nature doesn't stop people from being attracted to people under some arbitrary age.
Hebephiles are simply one step below and find pubescent teenagers to be attractive. People who can biologically have sex.
I think actual pedophilia is faaaar more disgusting, as the humam mind isn't meant to find any of those features attractive. It's a lot more predatory. You might be able to manipulate a 14yo into yes, consenting (not that it's moral) but a 5 year old? They have no sex drive whatsoever. Any "consent" is pure and utter manipulation and brainwashing.
Both are immoral to act upon but I'd say pedophilia is several degrees more fucked up. Something is severely wrong with you if you are attracted to pre-pubescant children and toddlers, it's not just some blurred line at that point. It goes against fundamental human nature.
your a homosexual.
you have no authority and/or credibility wahtsoever on what is and is not normal or appropiate heterosexual acts. -
2019-08-05 at 5:41 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie I'm seeing a girl my age currently since my hebephilia is primary but not exclusive, i make exceptions for attractive girls my age. So we were talking about sexuality and whatnot and i often 'joked' when we were out and their was a cute loli about how attractive i found her. So i told her; what if i wasn't actually joking? She said well, you can't help what you're attracted too and i agreed with her. After that i 'confessed' i actually am attracted to girls of the younger persuasion and she said: That's perfectly fine, you don't go around raping children anyway and if we ever split up and you find a cute loli willing to be your lgf just make sure everything is consensual. She even apoligized for not being younger lol but did ask me not to leave her for a cute 13 year old.
Needless to say i was surprised at her position regadring this but came to the conclusion my GF is pretty awesome.
What a desperate,low self esteem,bitch -
2019-08-05 at 6:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by JĎ…icebox I think hebephilia is more "mentally or evolutionarily normal" than homosexuality or attraction to ladyboys
Evolutionary yes.
But homosexuality appears in nature. Tons of animals, especially other mammals, are gay. Pretty much every male bonobo is bisexual.
Mutilated trannies not so much.
