User Controls

We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat

  1. Originally posted by DietPiano The real question of morality is how does a person without a set of guiding princples attatch himself to a set of guiding princliples? If there are more than one set of princples one can affix to himself, which set shall he choose, and is there only one set that is true, rendereing all other sets false, null, and void, or are there multiple differeing coexistant sets that are mutually exclusive yet all valid?

    There is no need to attach yourself to anything. If you like being alive and doing stuff, then you already fuck with my moral system and have already attached yourself to the only principles you need to make moral decisions.

    If you do not like being alive and able to do stuff then, well, there is no need.
  2. Originally posted by DietPiano What is the difference between the views A is A (Aristotle) and A is not not A (Kant)?


    All that I am is all that I am not
  3. Is there a practical difference between the two? If so, could you give me an example?
  4. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by apt I actually became an egoist just so I could hold an internally consistent position while smugly dismissing all complicated moral philosophy as the intellectual masturbation of ivory tower charlatans and never have to read any of those papers

    that's one way to do it I guess, I just don't like myself enough for that
  5. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Captain I'm not arguing for Lanny. I'm arguing for my moral system, which is simply based on logical consistency. Self interest, whatever that may be, seems to be an objective feature of any organism capable of participating in a society.

    As soon as you used my in front of "moral system" you defeated your own argument in favor of objectivity.
  6. Originally posted by Speedy Parker As soon as you used my in front of "moral system" you defeated your own argument in favor of objectivity.

    Wrong, and I've already shit on this specific argument.
  7. /threD
  8. Originally posted by DietPiano Is there a practical difference between the two?

    No.

    Originally posted by DietPiano /threD

    I posted this specifically to make you wrong
  9. benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    Originally posted by Obbe If one person interprets a behavior as moral and another person interprets the same behavior as immoral… to me, that means morality is obviously relative.

    i think im beginning to see it now.

    all my relatives said that its immoral for me to have had sex with my sister.

    yea. moralities are relatives.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Captain Wrong, and I've already shit on this specific argument.

    Everything you do and say is shit
  11. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    This thread is about food and should be moved to oral indulgences
  12. Originally posted by Speedy Parker This thread is about food and should be moved to oral indulgences

    I'll kill you you fucking nigger
  13. benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker This thread is about food and should be moved to oral indulgences

    no, this is more than just food.

    we do kill animals for things other than food, like for their skins.

    a few years ago i had actually decided to go gay and not buy and wear anything leather or had animal parts on it.
  14. Usually, the leather is what indicates your phaggotry
  15. benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    Originally posted by Captain Usually, the leather is what indicates your phaggotry

    trying to live a leather free life is harder than you imagine.
  16. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    It is difficult to surmount a lot of the barriers to a cruelty-free life, but I'm not rejecting leather because it's easier. Honestly, I have little patience for people who 'would be vegetarian' if it weren't harder. That's the whole point of doing the right thing, you get tested for it.
  17. benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    Originally posted by Zanick That's the whole point of doing the right thing, you get tested for it.

    thats rite.

    voting should not only be made extremely difficult, but also extremely painful aswell.

    voters should be made to climb 2000 steps of stairs paved with shards of glasses, with their knees to the polling booth.

    and they should be branded with the initials of candidates of their choice.

    when people have to give that much and be marked for life, they vote carefully.
  18. Originally posted by Zanick It is difficult to surmount a lot of the barriers to a cruelty-free life, but I'm not rejecting leather because it's easier. Honestly, I have little patience for people who 'would be vegetarian' if it weren't harder. That's the whole point of doing the right thing, you get tested for it.

    You seem to have abandoned any contention for your moral position.
  19. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    Originally posted by Captain You seem to have abandoned any contention for your moral position.

    This seems a little ambiguous, can you elaborate?
  20. Originally posted by Zanick This seems a little ambiguous, can you elaborate?

    What makes something someone's moral responsibility?
Jump to Top