User Controls
Money is everything.
-
2018-01-15 at 12:37 AM UTC
Originally posted by SBTlauien If money is the root of all evil, and gold/silver is real money, then gold/silver is the real root of all evil.
I always keep a silver coin on me. It was one that was bought with my first precious metal purchase and it wouldn't fit in one of the rolls.
Money is made out of paper, paper is made out of trees. Trees are evil. Those smug motherfuckers.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-01-15 at 1:01 AM UTCMoney is the result of our ego being freely allowed to express itself.
This started about the time we stopped the hunter/gatherer trend, mainly because we stopped foraging and started doing agriculture.
You see back when we were foraging, we had a more varied intake of mushrooms. Psilocybin is know for its ego repressing properties, and so when we stopped eating these shrooms our ego was allowed to blossom. Concepts such as "you and i" and "mine and yours" was reinforced and eventually replaced "us" with "us and them".The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-01-15 at 2:13 AM UTC^We certainly have evolved.
-
2018-01-15 at 2:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by Xlite Money is the result of our ego being freely allowed to express itself.
This started about the time we stopped the hunter/gatherer trend, mainly because we stopped foraging and started doing agriculture.
You see back when we were foraging, we had a more varied intake of mushrooms. Psilocybin is know for its ego repressing properties, and so when we stopped eating these shrooms our ego was allowed to blossom. Concepts such as "you and i" and "mine and yours" was reinforced and eventually replaced "us" with "us and them".
You speak of dissolving the ego as subject, but your ontology smells of dualism. -
2018-01-15 at 2:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by Xlite Money is the result of our ego being freely allowed to express itself.
This started about the time we stopped the hunter/gatherer trend, mainly because we stopped foraging and started doing agriculture.
You see back when we were foraging, we had a more varied intake of mushrooms. Psilocybin is know for its ego repressing properties, and so when we stopped eating these shrooms our ego was allowed to blossom. Concepts such as "you and i" and "mine and yours" was reinforced and eventually replaced "us" with "us and them".
I really don't think shroom consumption was higher pre-agricultural revolution. Why would that be the case? If anything it would be the opposite.
Do you really think religions were created sober -
2018-01-15 at 3:45 AM UTC
Originally posted by Issue313 It seems to be Fake News, yes, however it's important to note that the rich and connected do not go to the same doctors as the rest of us. For instance look at who did Tony Blair's heart surgery, who Bill Clinton went to about his arteriosclerosis, or who Ronald Reagan consulted with when he had cancer. Their health outcomes tend to be significantly better than any of ours would be.
EDIT: Dick Cheney also. An ordinary person would be dead 10 times over from his heart problems.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Cheney#Health_problems
It's more important that the rich live longer. It just makes perfect sense. Why should this be controversial? Do you think poor people with low to no savings surviving on social security have such good lifestyles that they'd love to live long? No, there's a powerful biological drive to live and to fear death, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be overcome and their miserable meaningless lives gotten over with as soon as possible. They're spending their time watching daytime television and rotting away. -
2018-01-15 at 4:16 AM UTCEventually, all societies degrade to the point where everyone eats each other. That's how those once-great empires vanished without a trace. They became so debauched and sexually vile and out of control, nobody worked anymore, poverty and food shortages finally took hold, and in the end they actually ended up devouring one another.
-
2018-01-15 at 5:43 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice It's more important that the rich live longer. It just makes perfect sense. Why should this be controversial? Do you think poor people with low to no savings surviving on social security have such good lifestyles that they'd love to live long? No, there's a powerful biological drive to live and to fear death, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be overcome and their miserable meaningless lives gotten over with as soon as possible. They're spending their time watching daytime television and rotting away.
My point was that we get lamentable medical care, and that the medical profession has infinite blood on its hands for preventing better standards of evidence and competence from being implemented in its industry.
But goddam your perspective is so jedied it's not even funny. Which jedi Libertarian did you pick up that mental herpes from, Mises, Block or Nozick? -
2018-01-15 at 5:44 AM UTC
-
2018-01-15 at 5:55 AM UTCAnd the ketchup supply was one of the first garnishments to completely sell out.
-
2018-01-15 at 5:56 AM UTCLet me post a cheat sheet on libertatianism:
When Mises defends the actions of the rent gouging landlord as being perfectly moral, he's defending his fellow jedis.
When Rand defends the actions of the bloodsucking capitalist as being perfectly moral, she's defending her fellow jedis.
When Block defends the actions of the loanshark and the pimp as being perfectly moral, he's talking about his fellow jedis.
When Nozick defends the actions of the literal slaveholder as being perfectly moral (so long as the victim and perpetual slave agreed to it, muh NAP and all), he's defending his fellow jedis.
When Friedman defends the actions of bankers raising interest rates to infinity percent (got to stop that inflation) as being perfectly moral, he's defending the actions of his fellow jedis.
Libertarianism is how jedis justify the economic and moral oppression of non-jedis. By convincing the losers that they deserve to be losers, and that everything is how it is supposed to be, they pull off a moral con-job. -
2018-01-15 at 6:37 AM UTC
Originally posted by Daily I really don't think shroom consumption was higher pre-agricultural revolution. Why would that be the case? If anything it would be the opposite.
Do you really think religions were created sober
Judaism (and the rest of the abrahamics) was conceived of and carried out by non-agricultural peoples. The amount of bullshit about shepherdry in the bible is impressive.
Originally posted by Issue313 Let me post a cheat sheet on libertatianism:
When Mises defends the actions of the rent gouging landlord as being perfectly moral, he's defending his fellow jedis.
When Rand defends the actions of the bloodsucking capitalist as being perfectly moral, she's defending her fellow jedis.
When Block defends the actions of the loanshark and the pimp as being perfectly moral, he's talking about his fellow jedis.
When Nozick defends the actions of the literal slaveholder as being perfectly moral (so long as the victim and perpetual slave agreed to it, muh NAP and all), he's defending his fellow jedis.
When Friedman defends the actions of bankers raising interest rates to infinity percent (got to stop that inflation) as being perfectly moral, he's defending the actions of his fellow jedis.
Libertarianism is how jedis justify the economic and moral oppression of non-jedis. By convincing the losers that they deserve to be losers, and that everything is how it is supposed to be, they pull off a moral con-job.
Good, good, the impending libertarian/anti-semite schism pleases me -
2018-01-15 at 6:38 AM UTChttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_jedi_intelligence
jedi people are inherently superior, which is why they have superior outcomes.
Haven’t you ever studied HBD/human biodiversity? -
2018-01-15 at 6:40 AM UTCThe same is true for socialism/communism/Marxism, btw. Strongly disproportionate jedi influence. jedis simply have superior cognitive ability.
-
2018-01-15 at 6:42 AM UTCSo, in other words, the secret behind Seinfeld's brilliantly witty observational banter is his Ashkenazi heritage?
-
2018-01-15 at 6:56 AM UTCThe jedi boogeyman strikes again
-
2018-01-15 at 7:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice jedi people are inherently superior, which is why they have superior outcomes.
Haven’t you ever studied HBD/human biodiversity?
I'm sorry Malice, but are you arguing that Putin's Son in Law is inherently superior to The Golden One.
vs
There is more to life than being a trickster and a skinny-fat con artist.
Originally posted by Malice The same is true for socialism/communism/Marxism, btw. Strongly disproportionate jedi influence.
jedis pushed communism when they were low status, in the 19th Century. When the jedis achieved Communism (like 90% of the inner-Soviets/Bolshevik party insiders were kikes) they implemented a most awful genocide against the non-jedis under their administration.
Yes, jedis are born neurotics. They think way too much. Not a good thing.
They are selfish, unconcerned with the wellbeing of others. They are a race of con artists and charlatans. The word zealot refers to a jedi sect, one even the Romans struggled with, and you can see them spreading out throughout the world after the fall of Israel. They are rotten people. They earn hatred and loathing everywhere they go.
Thinking too much is not a good thing, and is not an evolutionary advantage.
Has a jedi ever engaged you as an equal?
You do not have to like them, even though the media has told you you do.
jedis have been in charge for the last 60 years or so, since when the Germans briefly fought back (with very little success), but right now the mood is once again swinging against them. Generation Z is angry at them for openly encouraging open borders and trying to destroy their economic prospects. The jedis were counter-cultural in the 1920s, and in the 1960s, when they encouraged free sex and degeneracy, but right now they find themselves aligned with the boomers and with the current economic system. The counterculture is ours. Things are about to change. -
2018-01-15 at 7:03 AM UTC
-
2018-01-15 at 4:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice It's more important that the rich live longer. It just makes perfect sense. Why should this be controversial? Do you think poor people with low to no savings surviving on social security have such good lifestyles that they'd love to live long? No, there's a powerful biological drive to live and to fear death, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be overcome and their miserable meaningless lives gotten over with as soon as possible. They're spending their time watching daytime television and rotting away.
lots of former nazi war criminals die in their 90s. -
2018-01-15 at 5:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Issue313 Thinking too much is not a good thing, and is not an evolutionary advantage.
yes it is.
which is why species capable of thinking way more than necessarily occupies the top of the food pyramid.
and if you believe in evolutionary theory, its simply a matter of accepting the facts of life as it is.
jedis are superior becos they had been put thru way more pogroms, inquisitions and genocides than anyone else. and as we all know that in genocides and pogroms festivals, its only the shrewdest of the shrewd get to escape, mate and reproduce.
you really need to know how to think and think a lot to survive, and its exactly the lack of thinking on the part of the white people today that brought them into the predicament their in today.
