ITT: gay retards argue about base conversion

1. 2017-06-10 at 9:35 PM UTC

   #1
   

   Lanny Bird of Courage

   Originally posted by Rebirth then how is 66 possible from a conversion of base10 160 to base 6 66 dumbnigger?

   
   
   6 is not a valid numeral in base 6 you mong
2. 2017-06-10 at 9:36 PM UTC

   #2
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by Lanny 6 is not a valid numeral in base 6 you mong

   
   You stole my lein
3. 2017-06-10 at 9:37 PM UTC

   #3
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   good thread
4. 2017-06-10 at 9:38 PM UTC

   #4
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by Lanny 6 is not a valid numeral in base 6 you mong

   
   then why is 9 a valid number in 9 9, 9 and a half?
5. 2017-06-10 at 9:41 PM UTC

   #5
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by Rebirth then why is 9 a valid number in 9 9, 9 and a half?

   
   9 is not a valid numeral of base 9. That's why it's called base 9. 9 would be the tens unit in base 9.
6. 2017-06-10 at 9:43 PM UTC

   #6
   

   mmQ Lisa Turtle
   I'm going to buy a few ales, read up a little bit on this base shit, and come back and absolutely RUIN all of you, no matter if you're already correct or not.
   
   :)
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • hydromorphone
7. 2017-06-10 at 9:47 PM UTC

   #7
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by Captain Falcon 9 is not a valid numeral of base 9. That's why it's called base 9. 9 would be the tens unit in base 9.

   
   but half (nine and a half) of that, then would nine be possible over two seperate decimal places?
8. 2017-06-10 at 9:50 PM UTC

   #8
   

   Lanny Bird of Courage

   Originally posted by Rebirth but half (nine and a half) of that, then would nine be possible over two seperate decimal places?

   
   I don't know what you mean by this but if it involves the glyph "9" appearing in the base nine representation of a number then the answer is no
9. 2017-06-10 at 9:51 PM UTC

   #9
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole

   Originally posted by Lanny I don't know what you mean by this but if it involves the glyph "9" appearing in the base nine representation of a number then the answer is no

   
   what i'm saying is, the glyph nine doesnt reappear, but the patterns of half nines become apparent as the base conversion asymptotically falls toward nine
10. 2017-06-10 at 10 PM UTC

    #10
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    Solo, you might actually be giving me autism.
11. 2017-06-10 at 10:12 PM UTC

    #11
    

    Lanny Bird of Courage

    Originally posted by Rebirth the base conversion asymptotically falls toward nine

    
    that doesn't actually mean anything
12. 2017-06-10 at 10:14 PM UTC

    #12
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by Lanny that doesn't actually mean anything

    
    yes it does. it must suck to have a low iq. it means the higher the base, the more nines there are. this means there is an infinite amount of nines that cannot be accurately approached by only using a base conversion of 9 and/or 9 and a half
13. 2017-06-10 at 10:16 PM UTC

    #13
    hydromorphone victim of incest [insincerely conduce my paisley]

    Originally posted by mmQ I'm going to buy a few ales, read up a little bit on this base shit, and come back and absolutely RUIN all of you, no matter if you're already correct or not.
    
    :)

    
    do it, faggot.
14. 2017-06-10 at 10:20 PM UTC

    #14
    

    mmQ Lisa Turtle
    It's 424. Sploo has a senary IQ of 424.
    
    Thank you.
15. 2017-06-10 at 10:22 PM UTC

    #15
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    
    
    don't you see how every number line approaches nine?
16. 2017-06-10 at 10:26 PM UTC

    #16
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by Lanny that doesn't actually mean anything

    
    He doesn't understand limits lol
17. 2017-06-10 at 10:31 PM UTC

    #17
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    Theres only one type of base any of you should give a shit about and it's none of these
    
    Edit: actually two
18. 2017-06-10 at 10:32 PM UTC

    #18
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by Captain Falcon He doesn't understand limits lol

    
    the inherent limit is 9, but this limit gets an illusion of alteration through base switching, along with residuals that become obsolete through fractional conversions with no remainder
19. 2017-06-10 at 10:36 PM UTC

    #19
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole

    Originally posted by Rebirth the inherent limit is 9, but this limit gets an illusion of alteration through base switching, along with residuals that become obsolete through fractional conversions with no remainder

    
    You should become obsolete through fractional conversions with no remainder
20. 2017-06-10 at 10:36 PM UTC

    #20
    The Self Taught Man Black Hole
    I'm just kidding spoo we love you