User Controls
ACQUITTED FOREVER
-
2020-02-07 at 6:58 PM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 7 PM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 7:08 PM UTCWow, Larry called Trump Drumpf - it's all over for the orange man now
-
2020-02-07 at 7:14 PM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 7:18 PM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 9:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by cigreting Care to debate any facts they present nightly faggot?
What's the point? If you see fox news and Rupert Murdochs news corp as a bastion of truth and impartiality then its unlikely you have any idea exactly how they fool you on a daily basis. Or of the very subtle but extremely effective tricks they use to do so.
Wise up pal
. -
2020-02-07 at 9:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny because BBC told you so ?
I don't watch any tv stations and certainly not their news programs. Nor do I read any newspapers. I like to live in the real world myself, thanks. Not some artificially simulated reality matrix beamed into my mind by the ruling elites brainwashing propaganda media outlets.
. -
2020-02-07 at 11:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam My claim was that MOST history books won't mention it. You think people will care in 100 years about an impeachment that led to nothing?
Originally posted by Technologist Not just one impeachment. His name will always be mentioned when there is a discussion about impeached presidents. Johnson, Clinton, trump.
Ask most people who Andrew Johnson was and they don't really know or care. It will be the same way with Clinton and Trump in another 150 years. -
2020-02-07 at 11:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc What's the point? If you see fox news and Rupert Murdochs news corp as a bastion of truth and impartiality then its unlikely you have any idea exactly how they fool you on a daily basis. Or of the very subtle but extremely effective tricks they use to do so.
If you trust any single news source as such you're a fool.
The points would be valid if Trump was actually removed from office. That has never happened in the USA's history. Except for arguably Nixon who would've for sure been removed if he didn't quit first. -
2020-02-07 at 11:20 PM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 11:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Splam If you trust any single news source as such you're a fool.
The points would be valid if Trump was actually removed from office. That has never happened in the USA's history. Except for arguably Nixon who would've for sure been removed if he didn't quit first.
Nixon didn't resign to avoid removal from office as much as he did to avoid criminal conviction if it had gone to trial in the Senate. Unlike the three actual impeachments by the house (all of which failed to meet the higher standards of the senate) the move to impeach Nixon had broad bipartisan support in both legislative bodies. -
2020-02-07 at 11:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Nixon didn't resign to avoid removal from office as much as he did to avoid criminal conviction if it had gone to trial in the Senate. Unlike the three actual impeachments by the house (all of which failed to meet the higher standards of the senate) the move to impeach Nixon had broad bipartisan support in both legislative bodies.
You were wrong about my jeopardy question what's to say you arent wrong about this? -
2020-02-07 at 11:27 PM UTCOOOOH YOU JUST GOT ROASTED
-
2020-02-07 at 11:30 PM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 11:33 PM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 11:33 PM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 11:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc I don't watch any tv stations and certainly not their news programs. Nor do I read any newspapers. I like to live in the real world myself, thanks. Not some artificially simulated reality matrix beamed into my mind by the ruling elites brainwashing propaganda media outlets.
.
And yet you all spout identical talking points. Go figure. -
2020-02-07 at 11:59 PM UTC
-
2020-02-08 at 1:10 AM UTC
-
2020-02-08 at 2:47 AM UTC