User Controls
Trump is going down.
-
2020-02-05 at 4:14 PM UTCWhat's the most funny is these idiots are not only going to lose in 2020, they are going to lose both the House and the Seante, too, and the SCOTUS will have a majority of conservative judges, and the federal judge vacancies are being filled fast by conservative judges. Come 2020, these jackasses and clowns will be nothing but an unpleasant afterthought, no matter how much whining and crying and footstamping they do. All that energy. All that angst. All that hatred. And for what? Nothing! They are going to lose it all! The Democrap Party is finished!
-
2020-02-05 at 4:17 PM UTC
-
2020-02-05 at 4:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL What's the most funny is these idiots are not only going to lose in 2020, they are going to lose both the House and the Seante, too, and the SCOTUS will have a majority of conservative judges, and the federal judge vacancies are being filled fast by conservative judges. Come 2020, these jackasses and clowns will be nothing but an unpleasant afterthought, no matter how much whining and crying and footstamping they do. All that energy. All that angst. All that hatred. And for what? Nothing! They are going to lose it all! The Democrap Party is finished!
I do believe that party as we have known it is in it's death throes. I new creature will arise from it's remains and it won't be pretty. -
2020-02-05 at 4:29 PM UTCThis is how Trump and Barr should proceed next..
18 U.S. Code § 2384. Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
18 U.S. Code § 2382. Misprision of treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
18 U.S. Code § 2383. Rebellion or insurrection
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
18 U.S. Code § 2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
Trump and Barr need to round them all up and let's go... -
2020-02-05 at 4:30 PM UTC
-
2020-02-05 at 4:36 PM UTC
-
2020-02-05 at 5:15 PM UTC
-
2020-02-05 at 5:19 PM UTC
-
2020-02-05 at 5:22 PM UTCLooks like the dems are not going to let it go even after they lose...lololol
"House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said House Democrats will “likely” subpoena President Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton and continue with more investigations after today's historic impeachment vote.
“I think it’s likely yes,” he told CNN of issuing a Bolton subpoena.
Asked what they will look at, Nadler said, “We are talking about everything,” referring to continuing all the probes that have been launched since last year." -
2020-02-05 at 5:23 PM UTCAnd then Trump will go down?
-
2020-02-05 at 5:24 PM UTCMore likely the dems will be out of feet to shoot.
"uhh sorry we rushed it through instead of taking our time and gathering all the data and witness testimony before voting to impeach so we are going to continue on even though the Senate has already ruled" -
2020-02-05 at 5:26 PM UTC
-
2020-02-05 at 5:38 PM UTC
-
2020-02-05 at 5:42 PM UTC
-
2020-02-05 at 5:42 PM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 2:33 AM UTClol, Trump isn't going anywhere lol.
Hey OP, you might want to zip it when the next "scandal" comes out. lol. FUQ! -
2020-02-07 at 2:50 AM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 2:51 AM UTC
-
2020-02-07 at 2:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by Erekshun I don't doubt it, just watch…there will be another post…"We got him this time!"
I predict she will come in here creaming her crusty cow patty pants when Nadler announces he is going to subpoena Bolten. Followed by a week of silence when she learns he can't testify due to both national security concerns and the same reason Obama was able to squash the congressional subpoena with Holder during Fast and Furious, executive privilege. -
2020-02-07 at 3:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker I predict she will come in here creaming her crusty cow patty pants when Nadler announces he is going to subpoena Bolten. Followed by a week of silence when she learns he can't testify due to both national security concerns and the same reason Obama was able to squash the congressional subpoena with Holder during Fast and Furious, executive privilege.
So predictable. She says she is independent but liberalism oozes out of her daily.
