User Controls

SCIENTISTS : WE WERE WRONG, TIME AND TIME AGAIN.

  1. #41
    Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    fuckin copernicus
  2. #42
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    They can change the weather by picking your pockets.
  3. #43
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Well the sun going into "hibernation" mode doesn't change what humans are doing, does it? So solar cycles or little ice age periods will not stop the human contribution to greenhouse gases. The check will be cashed eventually.

    Greenhouses have several types of gas. Nitrogen (78%), oxygen (21%), argon (1%), and then trace amounts of carbon dioxide, neon, helium, methane, krypton, hydrogen, nitrous oxide, xenon, ozone, iodine, carbon monoxide, and ammonia. Which one are you worried about.
  4. #44
    Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Well the sun going into "hibernation" mode doesn't change what humans are doing, does it? So solar cycles or little ice age periods will not stop the human contribution to greenhouse gases. The check will be cashed eventually.



    greenhouse gas (co²) doeant magically heat the earth (globe) up. it merely retains the heat that our sun (solei) projects upon us.

    if our source of heat gets turn down, no matter how well we are at keeping heat, we still be getting cooler.

    you can wrap a blanket around a dead body, but that aint gonna make the body warm.
  5. #45
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Science is about learning, the best way to learn is from mistakes. Being wrong is a good thing if you wish to learn.

    refer to post #33.
  6. #46
    Originally posted by aldra 'weywot'

    fuck off.

    pls elaborate.
  7. #47
    PART IX: JEAN CLOUD VAN DAMM

    SCIENTISTS : WHILE WE WERE PROBING EACH OTHERS PROSTATE WITH SCIENTIFIQUE METHODS FOR SCIENTIFIQUE PURPOSES, WE WERE INTERUPTED BY A LOUD BANG ON THE DOOR BEFORE OUR AIDES BARGED IN BEARING TROUBLESOME NEWS.

    IT TURNS OUT THAT THOSE GOTT DAMM CLOUDS ARE HARDER TO MODEL THAN ANTICIPATED.

    https://mishtalk.com/economics/scientists-conclude-dire-climate-change-models-were-wrong-now-what

    Scientists admit they did not model clouds accurately and that they need a supercomputer 1000 times more powerful to accurately do that.

    Mish
    Feb 6, 2022

    130 Comments

    Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah, image by Mish, quote by Judy Collins

    Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah, image by Mish, quote by Judy Collins

    Climate Change Modeling Meets Limits of Science

    The Wall Street Journal reports Climate Scientists Encounter Limits of Computer Models, Bedeviling Policy.

    That is a non-paywalled, free-to-read link courtesy of the WSJ.

    It's lengthy but an excellent read. I encourage everyone to take a look.

    The dire predictions went out the window, seemingly unanimously. But there is plenty in the article for the fearmongers and the sceptics to both say "I told you so".

    Italic emphasis in the snips below is mine.

    Introduction

    For almost five years, an international consortium of scientists was chasing clouds, determined to solve a problem that bedeviled climate-change forecasts for a generation: How do these wisps of water vapor affect global warming?

    They reworked 2.1 million lines of supercomputer code used to explore the future of climate change, adding more-intricate equations for clouds and hundreds of other improvements. They tested the equations, debugged them and tested again.

    The scientists would find that even the best tools at hand can’t model climates with the sureness the world needs as rising temperatures impact almost every region.

    Dire Forecasts Wrong

    When they ran the updated simulation in 2018, the conclusion jolted them: Earth’s atmosphere was much more sensitive to greenhouse gases than decades of previous models had predicted, and future temperatures could be much higher than feared—perhaps even beyond hope of practical remedy.

    “We thought this was really strange,” said Gokhan Danabasoglu, chief scientist for the climate-model project at the Mesa Laboratory in Boulder at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, or NCAR. “If that number was correct, that was really bad news.”

    SCIENTIST: WE ARE VERY SORRY FOR ALL THE FALSE ALARM AND UNWARRANTED EXCITEMENT. WE SHALL NOW RESUME OUR PROSTATE PROBING EXPERIMENTS UNTIL THEY PROLAPSE. SINCERE APPOLLOGIES.
  8. #48
    Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    🤣 vinny you are telling on your inability to read and understand English
  9. #49
    Originally posted by Sudo 🤣 vinny you are telling on your inability to read and understand English

    and you are showing your inability to read between the lines and comprehend what youve read.

  10. #50
    CandyRein Black Hole
    Fight fight fight!!

    *sipps tea*
  11. #51
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny pls elaborate.

    No idea

    I've been way too messed up for serious posting these last few days


    Will return to regular service LATER
  12. #52
    Originally posted by aldra No idea

    I've been way too messed up for serious posting these last few days


    Will return to regular service LATER

    appollogies accepted
  13. #53
    Originally posted by CandyRein Fight fight fight!!

    *sipps tea*

    black people dont sip.

    they slurp in a loud and unpleasant sights.
Jump to Top