User Controls
Repurcussions If The Republicans Acquit Trump Without Witnesses And Documents
-
2020-02-02 at 1:10 AM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 1:10 AM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 1:11 AM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 1:13 AM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 1:26 AM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 5:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by Fox No it’s actually the opposite of groupthink. Each scientific study is done independently of one another and reviewed by peers. After enough individual studies show the same result, that’s what we call consensus. The scientific method encourages independence.
Groupthink is what the mass of idiots in this country do when they actually believe a politician saying literally baseless nonsense like climate change is a hoax by China. They all rush to the polls and elect these morons without any independent thought whatsoever
thats not how modern scientifique processes work. unlike scientists of the past who were mostly science hobbyists who scienced for the truth, modern professional scientists work just like modern professional soldiers.
this is because modern scientists, as scientific as they are, are unable to sustain themselves and their college debt on just airs and sunshines. they need monies, grants, and contribution and because scientists dont print money, this monies had to come from elsewhere. fron non-scientific sources.
in other words, almost all of these 'modern' 'scientists' are mere data mercenaries hired to harvest, mix, brew and blend data points and pie charts that support the preconceived notion they're hired to prove.
also you might have missed this :
https://niggasin.space/thread/29380The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-02-02 at 12:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny thats not how modern scientifique processes work. unlike scientists of the past who were mostly science hobbyists who scienced for the truth, modern professional scientists work just like modern professional soldiers.
this is because modern scientists, as scientific as they are, are unable to sustain themselves and their college debt on just airs and sunshines. they need monies, grants, and contribution and because scientists dont print money, this monies had to come from elsewhere. fron non-scientific sources.
in other words, almost all of these 'modern' 'scientists' are mere data mercenaries hired to harvest, mix, brew and blend data points and pie charts that support the preconceived notion they're hired to prove.
also you might have missed this :
https://niggasin.space/thread/29380
-
2020-02-02 at 1:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny thats not how modern scientifique processes work. unlike scientists of the past who were mostly science hobbyists who scienced for the truth, modern professional scientists work just like modern professional soldiers.
this is because modern scientists, as scientific as they are, are unable to sustain themselves and their college debt on just airs and sunshines. they need monies, grants, and contribution and because scientists dont print money, this monies had to come from elsewhere. fron non-scientific sources.
in other words, almost all of these 'modern' 'scientists' are mere data mercenaries hired to harvest, mix, brew and blend data points and pie charts that support the preconceived notion they're hired to prove.
also you might have missed this :
https://niggasin.space/thread/29380
So that's your expert opinion of the operation they have going at CERN? The discoveries they've made have just been brewed pie charts? -
2020-02-02 at 1:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace
Look! Its the Fat Mexican Surrender Flag.
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 So that's your expert opinion of the operation they have going at CERN? The discoveries they've made have just been brewed pie charts?
Don't pretend like you understand what they really do at CERN.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-02-02 at 1:19 PM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 1:19 PM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 1:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Of course not! Only *you* know what REALLY goes on!
I really don't know much of what they do there nor does anyone on this board, That was my point you fat attention starved beaner.
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 I think it's a top secret mission by the GREYS to communicate with long lost Father Son Admiral Jesus H. Christ alien twice removed, that you speak so glowingly about.
I don't believe in Jesus you have me confused with another user. -
2020-02-02 at 1:35 PM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 3:44 PM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 3:56 PM UTC
-
2020-02-02 at 3:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 So that's your expert opinion of the operation they have going at CERN? The discoveries they've made have just been brewed pie charts?
YES.
https://www.theverge.com/2012/6/8/3072393/speed-of-light-neutrino-mistake-cern -
2020-02-02 at 5:13 PM UTCOh, well an article from 8 years ago admitting to an error not only proves science cannot be trusted, but also that all scientific knowledge is brewed pie charts.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-02-02 at 9:23 PM UTCThe Washington Post
‘A massive historical story’: Trump’s impending acquittal could have profound ramifications for future presidents
Philip Rucker
The evidence of President Trump’s actions to pressure Ukraine was never in serious dispute. After a systematic presentation of the facts of the case, even some Senate Republicans concluded that what he did was wrong.
But neither was the verdict of Trump’s impeachment trial ever in doubt. The Senate’s jurors are scheduled to etch an almost-certain acquittal into the historical record on Wednesday.
The impending judgment that the president’s actions do not warrant his removal from office serves as a testament to Washington’s extraordinary partisan divide and to Trump’s uncontested hold on the Republican base. The expected acquittal also has profound and long-term ramifications for America’s institutions and the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches, according to numerous historians and legal experts.
In effect, they say, the Senate is lowering the bar for permissible conduct for future presidents.
“It’s a dispiriting moment for an American system that in many ways was founded on the insight that, because humankind is frail and fallen and fallible, no one branch of government can have too much power,” said Jon Meacham, an American historian and author. “The president’s party, instead of being a check on an individual’s impulses and ambitions, has become an instrument of them.”
This is not the first instance in which Trump has skirted penalties for wielding the powers of his office for personal or political gain. Former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III found that the president repeatedly worked to block or thwart the Russia investigation, acts to obstruct justice that would have prompted charges were he not a sitting president. But Trump sidestepped any punishment then, just as he appears to now with Ukraine.
One of the president’s lawyers, Alan Dershowitz, proffered a sweeping argument on the floor of the Senate last week that Trump using the powers of his office to pressure Ukraine to open a corruption investigation into the Bidens was not impeachable or illegal because it was done in pursuit of his reelection.
“If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment,” Dershowitz said during the trial.
In the face of stinging criticism from constitutional scholars and legal experts, Dershowitz said later on Twitter that his comments were being mischaracterized. “A president seeking re-election cannot do anything he wants,” Dershowitz wrote. “He is not above the law.”
Timothy Naftali, a historian at New York University and former director of the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, said the arguments advanced on Trump’s behalf in the Senate trial could have lasting consequences for the future of presidential power.
“The Republicans have embraced a theory that permits future abuses of power,” Naftali said. “The outcome of acquittal was predictable . . . but I’m afraid that this process in the Senate is more enabling of an abusive president than expected.”
The nation’s founders gave Congress oversight responsibilities and powers of impeachment as a check on the executive. Yet, with this week’s likely acquittal of Trump, Meacham argues, the Senate instead has become a tool in the president’s perpetuation of his own power.
“It is not hyperbolic to say that the Republican Party treats Donald Trump more like a king than a president,” Meacham said. “That was a central and consuming anxiety of the framers. It is a remarkable thing to watch the party of Lincoln and Eisenhower and Reagan and the Bushes become an instrument of Donald Trump’s. That’s a massive historical story.”
philip.rucker@washpost.com
full article @ http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-massive-historical-story-trumps-impending-acquittal-could-have-profound-ramifications-for-future-presidents/ar-BBZzB3h?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UE01DHP -
2020-02-02 at 9:29 PM UTC
Phillip Rucker could play a Ferengi on Star Trek without any makeup. -
2020-02-02 at 9:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Oh, well an article from 8 years ago admitting to an error not only proves science cannot be trusted, but also that all scientific knowledge is brewed pie charts.
yes.
for six months they been showing and shoving down everyones throat a brewed and blended pie chart that showed neutrinoes fly faster than the speed of light.
