User Controls
Repurcussions If The Republicans Acquit Trump Without Witnesses And Documents
-
2020-01-31 at 10:39 PM UTCObama also whispered on a hot mic to a Kremlin aide that he would "have more flexibility" after he was elected (meaning the Russians should wait until he got elected to get a benefit from him). Isn't that clear election interference and possibly illegal and should be investigated?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-01-31 at 10:42 PM UTCBoomtown, USA
Population: big mad -
2020-01-31 at 11:41 PM UTC
Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Boomtown, USA
Population: big mad
Why would we be mad? We just keep winning. Trump did promise on the campaign trail we would get sick of winning. That is one of the few promises he hasn't come even close to keeping. I'll never get tired of winning or your whining. -
2020-01-31 at 11:42 PM UTCLiterally OP
-
2020-01-31 at 11:43 PM UTCPoor Jessi Slaughter, her dad died shortly after that video and she wound up in care, hope her luck has changed.
-
2020-01-31 at 11:44 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Why would we be mad? We just keep winning. Trump did promise on the campaign trail we would get sick of winning. That is one of the few promises he hasn't come even close to keeping. I'll never get tired of winning or your whining.
"No, officer. I did not hit those people with my cane despite what that surveillance video shows. I am an honest upstanding American." -
2020-01-31 at 11:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Archer513 True.
Environment is the biggest scam since the military industrial complex.
It’s allllllllllllllllllllll money.
“Trump is ruing the environment and cutting environmental protections!”
Doom and gloom and apocalypse!
All about money. 80% of these agencies are redundant and bloated and have zero impact on the ground and in any protection. Grant money gets cut,environmental companies feeding on the government tit.
Guess who writes the press releases?
The grant holders,the agency leaders losing money and the environmental companies.
Good luck being a business and dealing with 37 government agencies and getting 29 permits and paying for 18 environmental studies every time you try to expand.
Complete fucking racket.
climate changes were concocted by environmental "scientists" to keep themselves employed.
on both sides. -
2020-02-01 at 2:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL An official can still be impeached after leaving office. Biden admitted on national TV that he threatened the Ukraine government that if the prosecutor looking at his son's corruption wasn't fired within six hours they wouldn't get a billion dollars in aid. The prosecutor was fired within six hours. Isn't that a crime, or at the very least, shouldn't that be investigated??
You can't impeach a person who doesn't hold office. SMH -
2020-02-01 at 2:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Imagine following a politician around counting the lies he says.
I mean this must be a whole new branch of higher mathematics.
Do we have enough Russian PhDs for this?
Lol at this point we might not.
Why is it just glossed over at this point? If its known all politicians are just constantly lying then why are we defending any of them?
Integrity is out the window right so what is it now, just about who lies the least? Maybe it is.
Funny defense though.
Person: *tells lie*
Other person: *points out it's a lie*
Person: "you're paying attention that I lied? How pathetic. Dont worry about it." -
2020-02-01 at 3:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker You can't impeach a person who doesn't hold office. SMH
Yes, they absolutely can be. For example, in the 1870s, Ulysses S. Grant’s Secretary of War, William Belknap, was impeached on charges of corruption and bribery. He resigned his cabinet post before the House could actually vote to impeach him, but the House went ahead and impeached him anyway. There was a lengthy debate in the Senate over whether it had the power to put Belknap on trial for the charges brought by the House, since Belknap had resigned. In the end the trial went forward, but Belknap fell short of the 2/3 majority needed for conviction even though the evidence of his corruption was clear; most of the Senators who voted against conviction did so because they believed the Senate lacked jurisdiction to try him now that he was out of office. But the fact that he was impeached and put on trial after resigning nevertheless could serve as a precedent for doing so to someone else again in the future. -
2020-02-01 at 6:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by itybit No wonder given in 1,095 days, President Trump has made 16,241 false or misleading claims. As far as the economy the GDP is at it's lowest rate since 2016. Not to mention what he is doing to the environment
you get those "facts" from cnn ?
Dont tell me you believe in global warming too? -
2020-02-01 at 6:41 AM UTC
-
2020-02-01 at 6:43 AM UTC
Originally posted by cigreting you get those "facts" from cnn ?
Dont tell me you believe in global warming too?
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ -
2020-02-01 at 6:47 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ Lol. Where do you get your facts from?
Sighhhhh.
What is wrong with you fuckers?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harvard-study-cnn-nbc-trump-coverage-93-percent-negative%3f_amp=true
There ya go bud -
2020-02-01 at 6:49 AM UTC"That said, the coverage of some news organizations was so negative, according to the Harvard study, that it seems hard to argue that the coverage was anywhere near a neutral presentation of facts"
Good quote there for you too. -
2020-02-01 at 6:50 AM UTCWhat about my thing though. I posted a link too
-
2020-02-01 at 8:02 AM UTC
-
2020-02-01 at 1:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by Fox https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
One problem. CO2 is the affect from warming not the cause. -
2020-02-01 at 2:40 PM UTC
-
2020-02-01 at 2:48 PM UTCThe CO2 is all just a red herring. A snipe hunt. A wild goose chase to draw attention away from the fact corporations are destroying the planet with pollutants and toxic poisons of every kind imaginable, all for profit. While you're busy looking at the sky and your neighbor, they're busy making trillions of dollars for themselves attacking the animal kingdom, the soil, the air, the food, the water, there's really nothing these absolutely worthless bags of stinking shit haven't corrupted, stained or stank up. It's one giant shell game, and you're the idiot trying to guess which shell the little ball is under. In my world, they'd all be dragged out, lined up, and shot.
