User Controls

This Shows The Level of Failure on the Democrats Impeachment Farce.

  1. #21
    Originally posted by -SpectraL First impeachment in American history to be submitted without any criminal charges being brought. No statutes cited. Zero. None. It's a farce.

    Lol what. Literally no president impeached had criminal charges brought up against them. Nixon resigned before impeachment and was pardoned despite not being charged with anything.

    1868 - Andrew Johnson had 11 articles of impeachment against him for 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. No criminal charges.

    1988 - Bill Clinton had two articles of impeachment against him for obstruction of justice and sexual misconduct. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. No criminal charges.

    2019 - Donald Trump had two articles of impeachment against him for obstruction of justice and abuse of power. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. Additional articles of impeachment being drafted. No criminal charges.
  2. #22
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Lol what. Literally no president impeached had criminal charges brought up against them. Nixon resigned before impeachment and was pardoned despite not being charged with anything.

    1868 - Andrew Johnson had 11 articles of impeachment against him for 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. No criminal charges.

    1988 - Bill Clinton had two articles of impeachment against him for obstruction of justice and sexual misconduct. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. No criminal charges.

    2019 - Donald Trump had two articles of impeachment against him for obstruction of justice and abuse of power. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. Additional articles of impeachment being drafted. No criminal charges.

    The impeachment articles in the other impeachments included actual allegations of crimes, you terminally stupid dunce.

    The articles against Trump don't contain any allegation of obstruction of justice, and abuse of power is not a criminal statute.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. #23
    Erekshun Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Lol what. Literally no president impeached had criminal charges brought up against them. Nixon resigned before impeachment and was pardoned despite not being charged with anything.

    1868 - Andrew Johnson had 11 articles of impeachment against him for 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. No criminal charges.

    1988 - Bill Clinton had two articles of impeachment against him for obstruction of justice and sexual misconduct. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. No criminal charges.

    2019 - Donald Trump had two articles of impeachment against him for obstruction of justice and abuse of power. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. Additional articles of impeachment being drafted. No criminal charges.

    This is what happens when you eat tidepods.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. #24
    Originally posted by -SpectraL The impeachment articles in the other impeachments included actual allegations of crimes, you terminally stupid dunce.

    The articles against Trump don't contain any allegation of obstruction of justice, and abuse of power is not a criminal statute.

    There were 10 counts of it in the Mueller report and they're still voting on additional articles, just wait.

    And again, impeachment isn't a criminal trial. None of those are criminal charges. He could be impeached for murder and it still wouldn't be a criminal charge. The criminal conviction happens in a different court. This is why Nixon was prematurely pardoned after resigning. The impeachment trial stopped right there. It was additional trial he was afraid of.
  5. #25
    Originally posted by Erekshun This is what happens when you eat tidepods.

    Great rebuttal

    Very hip
  6. #26
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Lol what. Literally no president impeached had criminal charges brought up against them. Nixon resigned before impeachment and was pardoned despite not being charged with anything.

    1868 - Andrew Johnson had 11 articles of impeachment against him for 'high crimes and misdemeanors'. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. No criminal charges.

    1988 - Bill Clinton had two articles of impeachment against him for obstruction of justice and sexual misconduct. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. No criminal charges.

    2019 - Donald Trump had two articles of impeachment against him for obstruction of justice and abuse of power. It passed the house, so he was impeached, but did not pass the senate, so he was not removed. Additional articles of impeachment being drafted. No criminal charges.

    Wrong, obstruction of justice is a crime.
  7. #27
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace There were 10 counts of it in the Mueller report and they're still voting on additional articles, just wait.

    And again, impeachment isn't a criminal trial. None of those are criminal charges. He could be impeached for murder and it still wouldn't be a criminal charge. The criminal conviction happens in a different court. This is why Nixon was prematurely pardoned after resigning. The impeachment trial stopped right there. It was additional trial he was afraid of.

    The only constitutionally valid impeachment is one which contains allegations of high crimes or misdemeanors, which are criminal statutes. So, yes, for the impeachment to be constitutional, the impeachment must contain criminal statutes. Sure, the House can launch an unconstitutional impeachment (which is exactly what they did); nobody is arguing that.
  8. #28
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace There were 10 counts of it in the Mueller report and they're still voting on additional articles, just wait.

    And again, impeachment isn't a criminal trial. None of those are criminal charges. He could be impeached for murder and it still wouldn't be a criminal charge. The criminal conviction happens in a different court. This is why Nixon was prematurely pardoned after resigning. The impeachment trial stopped right there. It was additional trial he was afraid of.

    There was no obstruction of justice in the Mueller report.
  9. #29
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Wrong, obstruction of justice is a crime.



    It's a crime if tried in a criminal court. Again, impeachment is not a criminal trial. Even if the senate convicts, you don't face jail time for it. You just get removed and are ineligible to run again. There would be a separate criminal trial not run by Congress.



    Originally posted by Speedy Parker There was no obstruction of justice in the Mueller report.

    You did not read the Mueller report.



    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e4/Report_On_The_Investigation_Into_Russian_Interference_In_The_2016_Presidential_Election.pdf

    Start on page 15. There are 10 counts of obstruction of justice. It'll likely become an additional article of impeachment, as the house is still working on digging through the absolute wealth of evidence the Trump administration has left in its wake
  10. #30
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace

    …You just get removed and are ineligible to run again. …

    So you're saying he could get removed on the last day of his second term and then run for a third term?
  11. #31
    Originally posted by -SpectraL So you're saying he could get removed on the last day of his second term and then run for a third term?

    No... he can't hold any public office after being impeached and removed. At what point did i say "AND THEN HE CAN RUN AGAIN!!!!"

    Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution states that “Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.”
  12. #32
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace No… he can't hold any public office after being impeached and removed. At what point did i say "AND THEN HE CAN RUN AGAIN!!!!"

    Article I, Section 3 of the Constitution states that “Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.”

    But if all this fraudulent harassment ends up to be decided by the SCOTUS to have interfered with the reasonable operation and enjoyment of his first term, wouldn't that permit him to run a third time?
  13. #33
    Originally posted by -SpectraL But if all this fraudulent harassment ends up to be decided by the SCOTUS to have interfered with the reasonable operation and enjoyment of his first term, wouldn't that permit him to run a third time?

    You can be kidnapped in pink handcuffs and forced to suck dick for 8 years

    you still don't get to run again. That doesn't change if you are impeached and removed.
  14. #34
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    There's already been a recent President who served three terms, you know.
  15. #35
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace It'll likely become an additional article of impeachment, as the house is still working on digging through the absolute wealth of evidence the Trump administration has left in its wake
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. #36
    Originally posted by -SpectraL There's already been a recent President who served three terms, you know.

    Lol do tell
  17. #37
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL There's already been a recent President who served three terms, you know.

    Yeah, I gotta hear this one too.
  18. #38
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    In 1940, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt served a third term. He actually ran and also won a 4th term, but died just a few months into it.
  19. #39
    Originally posted by -SpectraL In 1940, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt served a third term. He actually ran and also won a 4th term, but died just a few months into it.

    >recent history

    >80 years ago
  20. #40
    Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace >recent history

    >80 years ago

    That is recent history there are still people who voted for him living.
Jump to Top