User Controls
Dump idiot Trump
-
2020-01-08 at 3:09 AM UTC
-
2020-01-08 at 3:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra lol no
even if you don't count anything that happened in the last 70 years, supporters and family of the PMUs invaded the embassy because the US attacked Iraqi military positions and killed around 30 of them
i'v been veggitating out
Did Trump do a "Speech to the Nation" thing for us? -
2020-01-08 at 3:10 AM UTC
-
2020-01-08 at 3:13 AM UTC
-
2020-01-08 at 3:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 hahaha they enlisted by their own free will. and today, anyone who enlists automatically understands where they will be heading to, the Middle East.
it's like Americans who choose to move and work in the Middle East, they know the risk going in.
stop acting like this is a shock that American soldiers have been attacked by the Middle East.
Really no need to debate my post, I stated my feelings.
Now if ya wanna debate my assertion that he’s gonna loose the election partly due to this, bring it!😜 -
2020-01-08 at 3:21 AM UTC
-
2020-01-08 at 3:25 AM UTCIt’s over anyway, as long as trump doesn’t retaliate. Iran said this was their retaliation and they’re done, but if we retaliate?.....they have threatened to bomb Dubai and some city in Israel. We shall see.👀
-
2020-01-08 at 3:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Vid of one of the moolahs saying it?
https://twitter.com/JZarif/status/1214736614217469953
Originally posted by Technologist It’s over anyway, as long as trump doesn’t retaliate.
lol -
2020-01-08 at 3:55 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra https://twitter.com/JZarif/status/1214736614217469953
lol
Something is not right at all about all this. None of it passes the smell test. This is some kind of giant staged show of some sort. -
2020-01-08 at 4:30 AM UTCi think trump will do fine in 2020 with support like this:
Joe Lieberman Sad Democrats Won’t Support Trump’s Iran War
nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/...support-trump-iran-war.html
1 day ago · Joe Lieberman Is Sad Democrats Won’t Support Trump’s Iran War By Jonathan Chait Lieberman believes Congress should always support the president’s foreign policy, unless the president is a ... -
2020-01-08 at 4:32 AM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist If it was my son over there and he was injured or killed by these retaliations, I’d blame trump 100%.
Don’t see this helping him get elected. I believe he’s written his own ticket outta the white house. To be honest, I’d rather see him win than have these soldiers killed. This is sickening🤮
reminds of that woman who blames bush for her dead son. -
2020-01-08 at 4:37 AM UTC
-
2020-01-08 at 4:55 AM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 to which the son joined by his own doing against her will. but of course, the stupid dyke blames the president when it was her son who chose to join hahaha
Like getting in a car crash but not blaming the drunk driver who caused the crash to begin with
UR SON CHOSE TO DRIVE
HE KNEW THE RISKS
what ever happened to protecting democracy or whatever the actual fuck
No? Just bomb niggers? Ok.
Well America is niggers too. Especially people like u. Makes me happy thinking of your friends who died in combat. Its actually great that Republicans are so pro war. Means more of them will die abroad.
Dont worry. Mexicans will fill your jobs for you -
2020-01-08 at 5:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Like getting in a car crash but not blaming the drunk driver who caused the crash to begin with
UR SON CHOSE TO DRIVE
HE KNEW THE RISKS
what ever happened to protecting democracy or whatever the actual fuck
No? Just bomb niggers? Ok.
Well America is niggers too. Especially people like u. Makes me happy thinking of your friends who died in combat. Its actually great that Republicans are so pro war. Means more of them will die abroad.
Dont worry. Mexicans will fill your jobs for you
hey WETBACK, joining the military means there is more than a slight risk of actual action and possible war.
what a fucking moron trying to compare driving to the military!! -
2020-01-08 at 5:18 AM UTCand we are talking about joining since 9/11 which means you will do time in the middle east.
are you this fucking stupid for real? -
2020-01-08 at 5:50 AM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 to which the son joined by his own doing against her will. but of course, the stupid dyke blames the president when it was her son who chose to join hahaha
whats worse than this are vets who came back being less than the men they went to war as and then bitch and moan about being not given adequate medical and disability benefits they expect to be given.
they signed a blank cheque for uncle sam to cash out on whatever it takes to serve and protect and yet bitch and moan about not being properly compensated when finally uncle sam decides to cash an arm or a leg of theirs.
they signed up to pay the ultimate price for their country and yet brazenly refused to die of lung cancers they got from having huffed some DU powders while firing some antitank rounds in the name of serving their country.
what is this ? -
2020-01-08 at 7:21 AM UTC
-
2020-01-08 at 8:22 AM UTC
-
2020-01-08 at 11:47 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra lol
Yeah, I thought about that after going to bed. Iran stated that they are not responsible for anything it’s proxies do. There are too many of these militias that want revenge. Doubt it’s over.
I think Iran’s retaliation was disproportionate to our strike on Saleimani. It’s like Iran took the measured rational approach, they have more restraint than trump. -
2020-01-08 at 1 PM UTC
Originally posted by RottenRobert Why does this remind me of Gomer Pyle USMC and Sgt. Carter.
Because that ^stupid chit is prolly, no doubt, your "favorite" show.
Originally posted by RottenRobert Military will and has taken the worst for its cannon fodder.
very true...
of the "standards" with, usually, a DemoCRAPPY, as President!!
heheheh.
Originally posted by RottenRobert USMC
Individuals with ten or more minor traffic offenses, six or more serious traffic offenses, ten or more Class 2 minor non-traffic offenses, six or more serious non-traffic offenses, or more than one felony are not eligible for a waiver.
^ Wrong-O... Bucko.
As it states in the EPM MCRCO 1100.1
The below references are the number of offenses an "enlistee individual" may have and at what level of authority must approve these level of offenses.
Traffic offenses (TO)
1-4 offenses no wavier required
5+ offenses an RS CO approval wavier required
Non-traffic offense (NTO)
1 no wavier
2-4 RS CO approval waiver required
5-9 MCD CO approval waiver required
10+ ineligible
Misconduct (MO)
1-2 RS CO waiver required
3-5 MCD CO waiver required
6+ ineligible
Major misconduct (MMO)
1 Regional Commanding General approval required
2 Recruiting Commanding General approval required
3+ ineligible
The "Recruiter" determines whether or not "they" want to run a "wavier process" on an individual & keeping in mind the HIGHER levels of authority require "excessive background investigations" and majority of these conflict with securing an individuals security clearance.
a Case by case bases will be determined upon 1st approval of the Recruiter, the SNCOIC of the RSS and the appropriate approval authority.
...yes, CHIT, definitely, has changed--hasn't it?? Mr. BUCKO! 😆😆👍🏻