User Controls
Dump idiot Trump
-
2019-12-31 at 2:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker What crime? Crime being defined by a statute. Nixon had three articles of impeachment. They were obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of Congress. One of those is a crime. Can you guess which one? I'll give you a hint. It's the article that Trump does not have. I know you are mentally challenged as evidenced by the fact that you let cable networks do your thinking. So here is the answer.
https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20191216/CRPT-116hrpt346.pdf
See the difference between the sham that Pelosi won't even send to the senate vs Nixion and his very real crimes?
Real lawyers unlike yourself debated over this and it was approved by the House. You are just a Trump suck up with no mind of your own. NEXT! -
2019-12-31 at 2:29 PM UTCWhy does some people think you have to be convicted of a crime to be impeached? If y'all didn’t know, he doesn’t have to commit a crime to be impeached.
Everybody has their opinion, and bribery is a crime😁The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-12-31 at 2:59 PM UTC
-
2019-12-31 at 3:06 PM UTC
-
2019-12-31 at 3:09 PM UTC
-
2019-12-31 at 3:23 PM UTC
-
2019-12-31 at 3:26 PM UTCA study published in fall 2019 in the Journal of Economic Perspectives found that by December 2018, Trump's tariffs resulted in a reduction in aggregate U.S. real income of $1.4 billion per month in deadweight losses, and cost U.S. consumers an additional $3.2 billion per month in added tax.
-
2019-12-31 at 3:31 PM UTC
-
2019-12-31 at 4:24 PM UTC
Originally posted by RottenRobert The fairytale world of the Born Again Christian looking for Rapture
The question of the decade is: Why do people support President Donald Trump? A letter to the editor of the Lexington Herald-Leader by David Bowles claims people only support Trump because they believe his “fairy tales.”
We all know why white supremacists do, that is obvious. But why do good people support Trump? It’s because people have been trained from childhood to believe in fairy tales.
From childhood, they were told stories that were fascinating but simply not true. This set their minds up to accept things that make them feel good. Later in life some people mature, study facts and cause and effect, and start thinking more logically, even if the results are undesirable.
So you have this population that loves Trump because he makes them feel good. The more fairy tales and lies he tells the better they feel. Trump is a master liar who knows what makes people feel good and that is what he goes with. Sure, it would be nice if climate change did not exist.
Show me a person who believes in Noah’s ark and I will show you a Trump voter. There are multiple solid scientific reasons the ark did not happen. Some people learn this and some don’t, and those who don’t will accept Trump. But can the world survive on fairy tales?
David Bowles
Lexington
it's only 2:50 long. as much time as you waste this will not be an issue to anyone here. this is what i've been saying since DH and recently on here. Nowhere in Scripture does it ever claim Pre-Trib!!
-
2019-12-31 at 4:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Why does some people think you have to be convicted of a crime to be impeached? If y'all didn’t know, he doesn’t have to commit a crime to be impeached.
Everybody has their opinion, and bribery is a crime😁
He's not being impeached for bribery or any other statutory crime. There is no actual criminal charge.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-12-31 at 5:06 PM UTC
-
2019-12-31 at 6:28 PM UTC
-
2019-12-31 at 7:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist NO,
Are you serious? I didn’t know that! Well damn, I feel so silly.
Notice I said everyone has their opinion, then I stated mine!
Comprehension Specs, SMDH
It's not an opinion, it's a fact. There is no statutory allegations contained in the House impeachment articles. -
2019-12-31 at 7:44 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL It's not an opinion, it's a fact. There is no statutory allegations contained in the House impeachment articles.
Now you know I won’t go back and forth with you for long, so let me repeat:
Originally posted by Technologist Why does some people think you have to be convicted of a crime to be impeached? If y'all didn’t know, he doesn’t have to commit a crime to be impeached.
-
2019-12-31 at 7:54 PM UTC
-
2019-12-31 at 9:01 PM UTCWhile it's true an article of impeachment could contain no crime, as it is the House's sole prerogative to form the shape of the complaint, it's also true such an article would not be taken seriously, either legally or socially, and would be sure to be dismissed. It's basically an automatic failure.
-
2019-12-31 at 9:27 PM UTC
House of Representatives voted along party lines to impeach President Trump on one count of abuse of power and one count of obstruction of Congress related to his campaign to pressure Ukraine to investigate a political opponent.
It is just the third successful House vote to impeach a president, following those of Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. (Richard Nixon resigned prior to the vote to impeach him.) On the abuse of power charge, the vote passed 230 to 197, with two Democrats voting no. On the obstruction of Congress charge, the vote passed 229 to 198, with three Democrats voting now. Tulsi Gabbard voted “present” on both articles. -
2019-12-31 at 9:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by RottenRobert A study published in fall 2019 in the Journal of Economic Perspectives found that by December 2018, Trump's tariffs resulted in a reduction in aggregate U.S. real income of $1.4 billion per month in deadweight losses, and cost U.S. consumers an additional $3.2 billion per month in added tax.
So that's something like $4 and $8 per person per month?
Maybe taxing consumers a little more is a good idea anyway? -
2019-12-31 at 9:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by RottenRobert
House of Representatives voted along party lines to impeach President Trump on one count of abuse of power and one count of obstruction of Congress related to his campaign to pressure Ukraine to investigate a political opponent.
It is just the third successful House vote to impeach a president, following those of Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. (Richard Nixon resigned prior to the vote to impeach him.) On the abuse of power charge, the vote passed 230 to 197, with two Democrats voting no. On the obstruction of Congress charge, the vote passed 229 to 198, with three Democrats voting now. Tulsi Gabbard voted “present” on both articles.
since we know the Right majority Senate will vindicate Trump, do you honestly believe had the House remained in Republican control there would have even been this Impeachment trial?
i don't, and all of America does not either.
and could be very well why Trump and Obama are equally been chosen as most Popular by the American Citizens.
everyone knows this is a Democratic sham that will cost them in 2020!!
well, everyone but you mentally disturbed Democrats, that is!! -
2019-12-31 at 10:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 since we know the Right majority Senate will vindicate Trump, do you honestly believe had the House remained in Republican control there would have even been this Impeachment trial?
i don't, and all of America does not either.
and could be very well why Trump and Obama are equally been chosen as most Popular by the American Citizens.
everyone knows this is a Democratic sham that will cost them in 2020!!
well, everyone but you mentally disturbed Democrats, that is!!
Rimmer wait for your Rapture
