User Controls
Dump idiot Trump
-
2019-12-18 at 5:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson English must not be your first language…you appear to think not believing 1 source blindly is that same as saying the 1 source is wrong.
The source may well be 100% accurate..but again only an idiot would make that determination with only 1 source.
Not believing something because it comes from 1 source is a shit way to evaluate it. Just evaluate it retard. You might have good reason to believe it despite being from 1 source. English is your first language and you are a god damn disgrace to it.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-12-18 at 5:12 PM UTC^
if that is not circular logic after getting his lunch served to him, then it's just insanity at its finest!! -
2019-12-18 at 5:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Not believing something because it comes from 1 source is a shit way to evaluate it.
Agreed, that's why you use MULTIPLE sources and then make the determination.
Again English must not be your first language...not believing something BLINDLY (key word) doesn't mean you've dismissed the source as an untruth...it means you haven't accepted the source as a fact. -
2019-12-18 at 5:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Simple question: if tomorrow the CIA releases a report on the spiciness of various brands of salsa to inform a vote on salsa tariffs, would you think it's a reliable report or not?
If not, why not? Is it because they've lied in the past for stuff like COINTELPRO? Please say yes so I can rip you a new sphincter.
a smart person would ask themselve what is CIA trying to achieve by rating sauces and how they relate to national security. -
2019-12-18 at 5:23 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 5:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Agreed, that's why you use MULTIPLE sources and then make the determination.
Again English must not be your first language…not believing something BLINDLY (key word) doesn't mean you've dismissed the source as an untruth…it means you haven't accepted the source as a fact.
No retard. If one source of information gives you information you can corroborate the information to other sources with relevant information about the information but there is no reason for there to be more than 1 source for the information itself. -
2019-12-18 at 5:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE No retard. If one source of information gives you information you can corroborate the information to other sources with relevant but there is no reason for there to be more than 1 source for the information itself.
Fucking lol...
Is this guy really this stupid?
If you corroborate 1 source with another source (or more) then there is no longer 1 source... -
2019-12-18 at 5:27 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 5:40 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-12-18 at 5:49 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 5:55 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 5:56 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-12-18 at 6:05 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 6:05 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 6:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Source(s)?
Anyway what singular source are you suggesting Boeing listened to/believed and only listened to/believed?
..and hasn't it been established even if they did..it was a bad decision ;)
the whole MCAS that relied on the input from a single AOA sensor thing. -
2019-12-18 at 6:10 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 6:16 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 6:20 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 6:30 PM UTC
-
2019-12-18 at 6:33 PM UTCNon sequitur young benny.
