User Controls
Legal standpoint of me selling my nude pictures of when I was a child
-
2019-11-26 at 6:11 PM UTCThis post has been edited by a bot I made to preserve my privacy.
-
2019-11-26 at 6:30 PM UTCIs it even legal to HAVE nude baby pics to begin with? Sure everyone has them, but is it legal?
My mom tried to put one out at my graduation party and I think I ripped it up and then proceeded to get kinda drunk while talking to people -
2019-11-26 at 6:33 PM UTCI think the law gives credence to intent...if you intend to sell them as child porn then yes you'll get your adult bare botty spanked..figuratively. If however you are selling them for some "innocent" application, say a book about baby crap for new mothers...then I think you'd be fine.
-
2019-11-26 at 6:35 PM UTCSo can I buy a book of naked 14 year olds if my supposed intent is to make an investigation into nakedness on the psyche?
-
2019-11-26 at 6:36 PM UTC
-
2019-11-26 at 6:37 PM UTCIf no one wants to look at you as an adult, what makes you think people are going to want to look at dumb kid you?
-
2019-11-26 at 6:40 PM UTC
-
2019-11-26 at 7:28 PM UTCMy mom has my baby nudes...
Does that make her in possession of child porn?
Moms everywhere better start freaking out. -
2019-11-26 at 7:31 PM UTC
-
2019-11-26 at 7:57 PM UTC
-
2019-11-27 at 12:05 AM UTC
-
2019-11-27 at 12:43 AM UTC
-
2019-11-27 at 1:13 AM UTCSome minors have been arrested and tried as an adult for CP with pictures of THEMSELVES.
The law is fucked.
I don't know what the charge for selling CP of yourself as a teen/child should be... maybe a ticket or something. Definitely shouldn't be legal. -
2019-11-27 at 1:35 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Some minors have been arrested and tried as an adult for CP with pictures of THEMSELVES.
The law is fucked.
I don't know what the charge for selling CP of yourself as a teen/child should be… maybe a ticket or something. Definitely shouldn't be legal.
Here's a draconian law that might actually work. You make all companies in the production line criminally liable if their stuff is used for anything that could vaguely be deemed CP. So, got some CP on your phone? Well, now Samsung has to pay a fine, the carrier pays a fine, Sandisk pays a fine. What's that the pictures were taken on a Canon? Fine them too. Make it so painfully expensive that it becomes impossible to operate a business if there are more than a few incidents per company. Fine them in percentages so it scales up nicely. Dispense with 'intent' laws for CP too.
Call everyone a pedo who disagrees. While we're at it, let's give it a catchy name like "The War on Predators." Now we're getting somewhere. -
2019-11-27 at 2:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Here's a draconian law that might actually work. You make all companies in the production line criminally liable if their stuff is used for anything that could vaguely be deemed CP. So, got some CP on your phone? Well, now Samsung has to pay a fine, the carrier pays a fine, Sandisk pays a fine. What's that the pictures were taken on a Canon? Fine them too. Make it so painfully expensive that it becomes impossible to operate a business if there are more than a few incidents per company. Fine them in percentages so it scales up nicely. Dispense with 'intent' laws for CP too.
Call everyone a pedo who disagrees. While we're at it, let's give it a catchy name like "The War on Predators." Now we're getting somewhere.
So many things wrong with this. Should car manufacturers be liable for crashes? Computer manufacturers for hacking? Gun manufacturers for gun violence? -
2019-11-27 at 2:19 AM UTCI wish I would of met u...but now it's a little late...
-
2019-11-27 at 2:26 AM UTCWhat u Could of Taught me... I could have saved some face...
-
2019-11-27 at 3:03 AM UTCLimewire should have been liable as much so for profiting off it and for attracting such users than any of the a tual users themselves. And definitely moreso than thomas reedy the man who taught himself the computer like anna spysz.
-
2019-11-27 at 3:11 AM UTC
-
2019-11-27 at 4:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace So many things wrong with this. Should car manufacturers be liable for crashes? Computer manufacturers for hacking? Gun manufacturers for gun violence?
What do you do when you want to legislate against a demand? You make it cost-prohibitive for everyone from start to finish. I don't advocate for this, in fact i called it draconian. Is it right? No. Does it work? Better than current laws i'd wager. I just hope everyone who read that and found themselves agreeing with anything i said at any point in that posts has a good long think on why it would be a slippery slope.