2019-11-19 at 3:21 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE
Then shut the fuck up.
You're literally saying someone needs to boil a highly complex and extensive set of developments into an autism summary because you refuse to put in the effort.
You don't get to say "show me the evidence" then say "I don't like the way this evidence is presented".
Pointing to a pile of papers and saying the evidence in there somewhere is not the way to present a legal argument yet alone convince a jury.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-19 at 5:16 PM UTC
have you seen these pathetic looking human beings who've obviously been paid to lie their asses off to the Dem controlled House.
it's a great day however in America knowing the Senate will "save" the Day!!
2019-11-19 at 5:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68
have you seen these pathetic looking human beings who've obviously been paid to lie their asses off to the Dem controlled House.
it's a great day however in America knowing the Senate will "save" the Day!!
Watch out folks this guy is too sharp to be lied to
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-19 at 7:58 PM UTC
It is a question that has dogged Donald Trump - fairly or otherwise - since he was elected president: is he mentally fit for office?
The question has been raised again by the release of a new book by New York journalist Michael Wolff, which chronicles the first year of the Trump White House.
The book - the accuracy of which has been disputed by the White House and queried by others - paints the president as impatient and unable to focus, prone to rambling and repeating himself.
Mr Trump has hit back against Mr Wolff's account, claiming on Twitter to be a "very stable genius" whose "two greatest assets have been mental stability and being, like, really smart".
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
