2019-11-19 at 4:25 AM UTC
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
Originally posted by ORACLE
That's a legal standard for criminal cases which, as we have already established, this is not.
Don't be a faggot. All I'm saying is that to make an accusation like 'Russia hacked our election' you should at least have some concrete evidence of such. I've done a significant amount of reading on the matter and outside of a few thousand dollars' worth of social media advertising originating from Russian IP ranges (ie. no overt ties to the Russian government) to the best of my knowledge there is zero evidence of (illegal) Russian interference in the 2016 US election, state OR private, in the public domain.
***And none of the proponents of the theory have been able to provide any so far short of quoting 'intelligence' sources saying, again without evidence, that that's what happened.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-19 at 4:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra
Don't be a faggot. All I'm saying is that to make an accusation like 'Russia hacked our election' you should at least have some concrete evidence of such. I've done a significant amount of reading on the matter and outside of a few thousand dollars' worth of social media advertising originating from Russian IP ranges (ie. no overt ties to the Russian government) to the best of my knowledge there is zero evidence of (illegal) Russian interference in the 2016 US election, state OR private, in the public domain.
***And none of the proponents of the theory have been able to provide any so far short of quoting 'intelligence' sources saying, again without evidence, that that's what happened.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_electionsClick little numbers where you doubt.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-19 at 4:44 AM UTC
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
no I'm not going back in the wading pool
like I said I've spent too long in there already.
all I'm asking for is a single piece of concrete evidence.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-19 at 4:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra
no I'm not going back in the wading pool
like I said I've spent too long in there already.
all I'm asking for is a single piece of concrete evidence.
Then shut the fuck up.
You're literally saying someone needs to boil a highly complex and extensive set of developments into an autism summary because you refuse to put in the effort.
You don't get to say "show me the evidence" then say "I don't like the way this evidence is presented".
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
aldra
JIDF Controlled Opposition
Originally posted by ORACLE
Then shut the fuck up.
You're literally saying someone needs to boil a highly complex and extensive set of developments into an autism summary because you refuse to put in the effort.
No you fucking nigger. It's not complicated. I'm asking for a single piece of evidence that isn't hearsay.
If there was a legitimate basis to any of this it would be easy for you to point to 'one of the numbers' and say 'look here's a security company's report indicating that ballot machines were hacked' and we can go from there.
Instead every time I ask it's 'here are a thousand links I found that I didn't bother to read either, go through them, there's probably evidence in there somewhere'. Are you even aware of how many sham investigations Mueller has been a part of? He literally got the US government sued for witchhunting a guy after the anthrax scares.
Just fuck right off until you can actually back up anything you have to say without throwing up walls of spurious garbage.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-19 at 5:15 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra
No you fucking nigger. It's not complicated. I'm asking for a single piece of evidence that isn't hearsay.
If there was a legitimate basis to any of this it would be easy for you to point to 'one of the numbers' and say 'look here's a security company's report indicating that ballot machines were hacked' and we can go from there.
Instead every time I ask it's 'here are a thousand links I found that I didn't bother to read either, go through them, there's probably evidence in there somewhere'. Are you even aware of how many sham investigations Mueller has been a part of? He literally got the US government sued for witchhunting a guy after the anthrax scares.
Just fuck right off until you can actually back up anything you have to say without throwing up walls of spurious garbage.
What I mean by it not being a legal matter is simple: innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt is the criteria by which we convict someone of criminal and throw them in jail. When a 30 page indictment goes down a laundry list of extremely specific points, that means the prosecutor is prepared to fuck with each one. Do you think they just made it up? What I'm saying is, it is perfectly reasonable to look at it and conclude X based in lots of signs pointing there. We're not throwing him in jail.
Nobody is seriously saying that Russia literally jacked in and changed votes to Trump you moron. I'm fully familiar with 100% of the facts of the investigation.
https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/downloadhttps://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/magazine/the-agency.html
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-19 at 5:23 AM UTC
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Two FBI agents were waiting near Seth Rich's home the night he was murdered. As Seth was returning from the bar, the two agents stepped out of the shadows and began talking to him. They told him he had something they were looking for. They identified themselves. Seth told them he didn't have what they wanted and tried to pass, but they grabbed him and began trying to search his pockets. Seth tore away, and as he ran, one of the agents shot him in the back, and then again when he fell. A third FBI agent was nearby and then arrived. Together, the three agents fled the scene. The FBI then concocted the robbery story and sent it out to the mainstream media.
2019-11-19 at 8:11 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra
Putin personally offered to open a joint investigation but was rebuffed.
Lol
But don't believe US intelligence. It's all hearsay. Don't be stupid people.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-19 at 12:14 PM UTC
It was the Hillary campaign that was behind the FISA warrants that Comey had signed to surveillance the TRUMP campaign, not the other way around... you silly yuk-yuks. That has already been established.
2019-11-19 at 1:59 PM UTC
Holy shit at aldra using Putin's word but won't accept the CIA lol. He really is a brainwashed little toad. It's very well known that Russia has been interfering in Western elections for a long time. China is doing the same in his country like they have been in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore for decades.
But you probably won't find aldra arguing about that.
