User Controls
A lot of Brits think their country is run by Pedos. This is why.
-
2019-11-17 at 6:09 PM UTChttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_paedophile_dossier
Basically in the mid 80s some Labour MP gets up in the Commons and starts naming names. He hands a 40 page dossier containing names and details to Maggie the Milk Snatcher's Home Secretary, a Lithuan jedi named Leon Brittan. The dossier was "not retained", and the whole thing covered up. The dossier has never been seen in public.
Pedos used to be quite open in the UK. For instance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophile_Information_ExchangeThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-11-17 at 6:53 PM UTC
In 1990, according to journalist James Hanning, Chris Fay, a Labour councillor, convicted fraudster[8] and a campaigner for the National Association of Young People in Care, claimed on oath that former Home Secretary Leon Brittan had been involved in abuse and that in March 1990 he had seen a photograph of Brittan with a young boy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elm_Guest_House_claims_and_controversy#History_of_claims
(((of course))) -
2019-11-17 at 10:05 PM UTCWith the amount of planets jedis have been thrown out of you gotta wonder who's really in the wrong
-
2019-11-17 at 10:15 PM UTC
A briefing note from October 1980 from Thatcher’s private secretary, Sir Robert Armstrong, gives her a rundown on what had been swiftly learned about Hayman, noting that before the revelations he had seemed “to all appearances a healthy, normal and happily married man”.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives
Hayman had taken part in sexual activities “with consenting adults (of both sexes)”, Armstrong told Thatcher. However, any material related to children “appeared to be all fantasy”. The memo noted that it was “clear that Sir Peter Hayman was already engaging in sexual perversion in 1966 when he returned from Berlin to the Foreign Office, and it must be presumed that he was doing so before that time”. This was, in retrospect, a big security risk at the time, he added.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hayman_(diplomat)
Hayman was a glow in the dark nigger high up in MI6, something the Grauniad, as an establishment paper, doesn't mention.
Even if Hayman wasn't a molester (a big if), MI6 did use sexual blackmail all the time, and would cover for the crimes of their compromised assets with the police. -
2019-11-17 at 10:27 PM UTCwow I actually informed 2 people about this after seeing this thread. Its quite sinister
-
2019-11-18 at 12:30 AM UTCThe prince is a pedo for sure
-
2019-11-18 at 12:33 AM UTC
On 7 July 2014, the Home Secretary, Theresa May, announced a review into the handling of historic child abuse allegations, to be led by Peter Wanless, chief executive of the NSPCC, and the establishment of a public panel inquiry into the duty of care taken in the protection of children from paedophiles by British public institutions, led by an independent panel of experts and chaired by Baroness Butler-Sloss. Butler-Sloss later stood down as chair of the inquiry.[2] On 5 September 2014, it was announced that it would instead be chaired by Fiona Woolf[3] but on 31 October 2014 she, too, resigned from the role.[4] On 4 February 2015 it was announced that the inquiry would be chaired by Justice Lowell Goddard, a New Zealand High Court judge. The existing panel would be disbanded, and the inquiry would be given new powers.[5] On 4 August 2016, she also resigned from the role.[6]
well
I did not know that -
2019-11-18 at 1:06 AM UTCABC squashed the Epstien story because they feared the ties in the story to the royal family would anger them and limit the networks access to the royals
-
2019-11-18 at 9:54 PM UTCMax Spiers certainly agreed about this.
-
2019-11-19 at 1:28 AM UTC
-
2019-11-19 at 6:39 AM UTCthe only reason pedophillia is illegal is because the ones in power want to keep the monopoly of childrens to themselves.
