User Controls
Trump's pal and White House adviser Stephen Miller EXPOSED as explicit white supremacist
-
2019-11-13 at 9:39 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 9:43 PM UTCWhat else can you expect from the cabinet of Donald J Kidfucker, folks?
-
2019-11-13 at 9:54 PM UTCYeah, nothing partisan hack at all about GQ, that's for sure. They're total neutral and impartial to Democrat objectives.
GQ has been closely associated with metrosexuality. The writer Mark Simpson coined the term in an article for British newspaper The Independent about his visit to a GQ exhibition in London: "The promotion of metro-sexuality was left to the men's style press, magazines such as The Face, GQ, Esquire, Arena and FHM, the new media which took off in the Eighties and is still growing ... They filled their magazines with images of narcissistic young men sporting fashionable clothes and accessories. And they persuaded other young men to study them with a mixture of envy and desire."
On April 19, 2018, the editors of GQ published an article titled "21 Books You Don’t Have To Read" in which the editors compiled a list of works they think are overrated and should be passed over, including Catcher in the Rye, The Alchemist, Blood Meridian, A Farewell to Arms, The Old Man and the Sea, The Lord of the Rings, and Catch-22.[24][25] GQ’s review included a criticism of the Bible, calling it "repetitive, self-contradictory, sententious, foolish, and even at times ill-intentioned".[26] The article generated a backlash among Internet commentators.[27] -
2019-11-13 at 10:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Yeah, nothing partisan hack at all about GQ, that's for sure. They're total neutral and impartial to Democrat objectives.
GQ has been closely associated with metrosexuality. The writer Mark Simpson coined the term in an article for British newspaper The Independent about his visit to a GQ exhibition in London: "The promotion of metro-sexuality was left to the men's style press, magazines such as The Face, GQ, Esquire, Arena and FHM, the new media which took off in the Eighties and is still growing … They filled their magazines with images of narcissistic young men sporting fashionable clothes and accessories. And they persuaded other young men to study them with a mixture of envy and desire."
On April 19, 2018, the editors of GQ published an article titled "21 Books You Don’t Have To Read" in which the editors compiled a list of works they think are overrated and should be passed over, including Catcher in the Rye, The Alchemist, Blood Meridian, A Farewell to Arms, The Old Man and the Sea, The Lord of the Rings, and Catch-22.[24][25] GQ’s review included a criticism of the Bible, calling it "repetitive, self-contradictory, sententious, foolish, and even at times ill-intentioned".[26] The article generated a backlash among Internet commentators.[27]
^ Canadian
The emails are publicly available to view. You can view them yourself and try to cry about something specific.
I guess the ex editor of Breitbart is LIBRUL LIARZ too right?
I.e. Shut up Canadian faggot. -
2019-11-13 at 10:07 PM UTC
Katie McHugh, who was an editor for Breitbart from April 2014 to June 2017, leaked the emails to Hatewatch in June to review, analyze and disseminate to the public. McHugh was 23 when she started at Breitbart and also became active in the anti-immigrant movement, frequently rubbing shoulders with white nationalists. McHugh was fired from Breitbart in 2017 after posting anti-Muslim tweets.
-
2019-11-13 at 10:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE ^ Canadian
The emails are publicly available to view. You can view them yourself and try to cry about something specific.
I guess the ex editor of Breitbart is LIBRUL LIARZ too right?
I.e. Shut up Canadian faggot.
Yeah, I read the e-mails, retard, and there's nothing at all racist in them. It's just the deluded and dishonest Democrats over at GQ saying there is. -
2019-11-13 at 10:07 PM UTC"She left Breitbart and renounced the FAR RIGHT so now she is a biased lefty despite having been a respected journalist on both sides of the aisle and still being conservative".
-
2019-11-13 at 10:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Yeah, I read the e-mails, retard, and there's nothing at all racist in them. It's just the deluded and dishonest Democrats over at GQ saying there is.
You didn't read shit faggot. There are 900 emails and they were released mere hours ago. And you were blissfully unaware till this thread, as evidenced by the fact that there is no evidence to the contrary. -
2019-11-13 at 10:21 PM UTChttps://mediabiasfactcheck.com/gq-magazine/
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
Analysis / Bias
In review, GQ primary reports on men’s fashion and lifestyle. They also occasionally report on politics with a left leaning bias such as this: Trump Promotes Conspiracy Theorist Who Says the President Is Like the “King of Israel”. This story is thoroughly sourced to credible publications such as the Washington Post and Pew Research. When reporting on conservatives, their is frequent use of emotional language such as this: How to Fix the Conservative Hijacking of the Supreme Court. Editorially, GQ favors liberal policies and almost always reports negatively on the right.
And they use one of the fakest news rags around, the Washington Post, on par with the National Enquirer, as their "rock solid trusted and strong sources". What a joke! How can you have "strong sourcing and a clean fact check record", when you are using known fake news rags as your sourcing - sources who pushed a fake Russian narrative 24/7 for almost three years, until they were exposed for the frauds they really are?? -
2019-11-13 at 10:25 PM UTCThis is known. Stephen Miller is the one good jedi.
-
2019-11-13 at 10:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE You didn't read shit faggot. There are 900 emails and they were released mere hours ago. And you were blissfully unaware till this thread, as evidenced by the fact that there is no evidence to the contrary.
I've had the e-mails for weeks, son. Who do you think you're talking to here? -
2019-11-13 at 10:39 PM UTCHe's jewish though
-
2019-11-13 at 10:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/gq-magazine/
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
Analysis / Bias
In review, GQ primary reports on men’s fashion and lifestyle. They also occasionally report on politics with a left leaning bias such as this: Trump Promotes Conspiracy Theorist Who Says the President Is Like the “King of Israel”. This story is thoroughly sourced to credible publications such as the Washington Post and Pew Research. When reporting on conservatives, their is frequent use of emotional language such as this: How to Fix the Conservative Hijacking of the Supreme Court. Editorially, GQ favors liberal policies and almost always reports negatively on the right.
And they use one of the fakest news rags around, the Washington Post, on par with the National Enquirer, as their "rock solid trusted and strong sources". What a joke! How can you have "strong sourcing and a clean fact check record", when you are using known fake news rags as your sourcing - sources who pushed a fake Russian narrative 24/7 for almost three years, until they were exposed for the frauds they really are??
No need to trust GQ. The emails are publicly available. -
2019-11-13 at 10:55 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 10:56 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 10:57 PM UTCI PMed extensively with Stephen Miller back on the IronMarch forums.
-
2019-11-13 at 10:57 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 11:01 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 11:03 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 11:12 PM UTC
