User Controls
Dump idiot Trump
-
2019-11-13 at 6:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Would you report him and have him prosecuted if you could?
No. Even if I disapproved (which I don't) he's was a friend, and I don't fuck over friends for anything.
Originally posted by 6011UM Thats not how it works lol. You need at least a green card. So, a legal resident. You can't just go on vacation and do it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_soli
Wrong. -
2019-11-13 at 6:23 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 hey shit for brains, it was not illegal immigration until we figured out how it was being used that way.
like the expiring visa and marrying a citizen Law.
they have been looking into these visa rules and connecting them to illegal immigration.
anyway a foreigner gets here, can now be viewed as a way an illegal is trying to get here!!
so you're talking about an illigal immigrant who for instance has got here by marrying a US citizen then?
. -
2019-11-13 at 6:23 PM UTChttps://www.hg.org/legal-articles/is-it-legal-to-visit-america-to-have-a-baby-in-order-to-create-citizenship-35649
What many do not realize is that an “anchor baby” does not guarantee immediate citizenship for the parents or ensure continued residency in the US for the child. In most instances, while the child will have US citizenship, the child would not be able to live alone in the US until reaching the age of majority. Thus, in most cases, the parent(s) and child are returned to their country of origin, and the child has the right to return to the US as a citizen after turning 18 (or can visit anytime before that). -
2019-11-13 at 6:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country No. Even if I disapproved (which I don't) he's was a friend, and I don't fuck over friends for anything.
Yeah, fucking exactly. People like you are literally the only actual problem in the system.
Anchor babies are already thoroughly illegal. It's just difficult to prosecute because it's difficult to prove intent. Because everybody feels that way about their friends. You are the kind of shit who only cares about the rules when it's someone else. Well everyone is someone else to someone else, faggot.
It's no different than the "not MY abortion" republicans who get it banned in their state then go to another state to fetus deletus when their kid gets pregnant or they knock up an intern.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-11-13 at 6:26 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 6:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Yeah, fucking exactly. People like you are literally the only actual problem in the system.
Anchor babies are already thoroughly illegal. It's just difficult to prosecute because it's difficult to prove intent. Because everybody feels that way about their friends. You are the kind of shit who only cares about the rules when it's someone else. Well everyone is someone else to someone else, faggot.
It's no different than the "not MY abortion" republicans who get it banned in their state then go to another state to fetus deletus when their kid gets pregnant or they knock up an intern.
If you are accusing me of treating my friends better than I treat strangers, then I stand guilty as charged.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-11-13 at 6:32 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 6:34 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 6:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country If you are accusing me of treating my friends better than I treat strangers, then I stand guilty as charged.
Then you simply do not respect rule of law.
At which point I feel comfortable saying: shut up faggot. Your considerations are entirely emotional, like a woman, and thus worthless. -
2019-11-13 at 6:39 PM UTCTHE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN EYYYEBAWWLL
. -
2019-11-13 at 6:57 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 7:48 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc that makes him an american citizen you moron.
many women give birth while on holiday abroad and register their children when they return. that doesn't make their offspring a foreigner. why would anyone even consider that to be the case?
.
You don't know what registration means, do you kid? Just because she registered the phony in America doesn't mean she registered the fraud as being born in America. The impostor was registered in America as being born in Kenya, and the FBI covered up that registration detail, and then provided a bogus birth certificate. -
2019-11-13 at 7:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker They are the law not suggestions. The rule of law is why our Republic has so long endured.
no, not really.
federal reserve is unconstitutional, and it exists.
it also says your free to bear arms, but you arent.
you arent because guns, and the freedom to bear them is regulated.
regulated ≠ free. -
2019-11-13 at 7:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Regardless of birth certificate, he is a born citizen as his mother was American.
https://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/citizenship-through-parents
Cited chapter:
https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-h-chapter-5
The Child Citizenship Act of 2000 is null & void, because the Constitution is the highest law in the land, and supersedes all other laws. Just because a bunch of radical liberals decide to create a law does not make it a valid law. -
2019-11-13 at 8:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The Child Citizenship Act of 2000 is null & void, because the Constitution is the highest law in the land, and supersedes all other laws. Just because a bunch of radical liberals decide to create a law does not make it a valid law.
Shut the fuck up Canadian faggot.
1) The act only amended the cited article in 2000. You can follow the link and see it's entire revision history, to prior to Obama's birth.
2) Go ahead and take it to the Supreme Court, and have it overturned for being unconstitutional faggot. Oh wait you can't because you are a Canadian faggot and don't know shit about the constitution.
3) Why haven't Republicans including Donald J Kidfucker done that? Is it because they are incompetent or because it isn't unconstitutional?
Trick question, it's both. They are massively incompetent, but it not unconstitutional anyway. If you disagree, show me what part of the constitution contradicts it.
In summary:
-
2019-11-13 at 8:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE Shut the fuck up Canadian faggot.
1) The act only amended the cited article in 2000. You can follow the link and see it's entire revision history, to prior to Obama's birth.
2) Go ahead and take it to the Supreme Court, and have it overturned for being unconstitutional faggot. Oh wait you can't because you are a Canadian faggot and don't know shit about the constitution.
3) Why haven't Republicans including Donald J Kidfucker done that? Is it because they are incompetent or because it ai t unconstitutional.
Trick question, it's both. They are massively incompetent, but it not unconstitutional anyway. If you disagree, show me what part of the constitution contradicts it.
All that's about change, dummy. Watch and see. People have had enough of you leftists' phony laws, phony propaganda, phony hearings, and phony party. -
2019-11-13 at 8:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL All that's about change, dummy. Watch and see. People have had enough of you leftists' phony laws, phony propaganda, phony hearings, and phony party.
^ Canadian faggot has no response and cosplays as a Republican because he wishes he was American rather than living under turbo cucked Canadian government.
Edit: shut the fuck up Canadian faggotThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-11-13 at 8:51 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 8:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL All that's about change, dummy. Watch and see. People have had enough of you leftists' phony laws, phony propaganda, phony hearings, and phony party.
they're far from phony when that party once was backed by the KKK while hanging da brutha's swinging off trees. look at the Black people in America. for over 125 years they have been freed and the Democrats claim to be helping them.
when is it exactly after 125 years that the Democratic Party plans to bring the black people out of their oppression?
another 125 years?
no one needs the Left's point of view, it's a useless waste of time!! -
2019-11-13 at 8:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 they're far from phony when that party once was backed by the KKK while hanging da brutha's swinging off trees. look at the Back people in America. for over 125 years they have been freed and the Democrats claim to be helping them.
when is it exactly after 125 years that the Democratic Party plans to bring the black people out of their oppression?
another 125 years?
no one needs the Left's point of view, it's a useless waste of time!!
^ Conservative snowflake encourages ignorance of US history
http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/reversal2.pdf
As always, conservatives are the most unAmerican, to the point of denying our history!The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
