User Controls
Dump idiot Trump
-
2019-11-13 at 5:20 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc imagine having to leave your premature new born baby alone in a foreign country because you went into labor early while on vacation and now your tourist visa expired but your country refuses to give your new born baby a visa or recognise them as a domestic citizen? lol
.
no, it was originally designed for a good purpose, but like all good things, it became a misuse way to enter this Nation illegally.
but honestly, it's difficult to know who is sincere and who is here by way of criminal.
and now that these Laws have been reinforced, you will find both. and that is enough to still continue the process because you are keeping out what you want to let in legally!! -
2019-11-13 at 5:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc imagine having to leave your premature new born baby alone in a foreign country because you went into labor early while on vacation and now your tourist visa expired but your country refuses to give your new born baby a visa or recognise them as a domestic citizen? lol
I'm pretty sure there are diplomatic officers you can talk to if that happens. -
2019-11-13 at 5:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc imagine having to leave your premature new born baby alone in a foreign country because you went into labor early while on vacation and now your tourist visa expired but your country refuses to give your new born baby a visa or recognise them as a domestic citizen? lol
.
thats not what a visa is for. -
2019-11-13 at 5:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by ORACLE He literally posted a link explaining just that.
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 no, it was originally designed for a good purpose, but like all good things, it became a misuse way to enter this Nation illegally.
but honestly, it's difficult to know who is sincere and who is here by way of criminal.
and now that these Laws have been reinforced, you will find both. and that is enough to still continue the process because you are keeping out what you want to let in legally!!
Dumbass. You are talking about birthright citizenship used for anchor babies. And that is already illegal. It's just difficult to prove intent.
He's referring to the fact that a child born abroad to someone that is already a US citizen, is automatically a citizen of the US. If you go to China and have a baby, the baby will still be allowed to come home with you.
How the fuck is this abused by people to get.into the country? The parents already have to be citizens.
And birthright citizenship is about as sacred an American policy as it gets.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-11-13 at 5:34 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 5:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country I'm pretty sure there are diplomatic officers you can talk to if that happens.
There is nothing any diplomatic officer can do to give someone citizenship just for lulz unless the right to citizenship for children of citizens already exists. -
2019-11-13 at 5:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Trouble understanding people who are different? You're the one claiming that a whole group of people are somehow mentally crippled for not agreeing with you about everything.
No I didnt.
Originally posted by ORACLE
Dumbass. You are talking about birthright citizenship used for anchor babies. And that is already illegal. It's just difficult to prove intent.
He's referring to the fact that a child born abroad to someone that is already a US citizen, is automatically a citizen of the US. If you go to China and have a baby, the baby will still be allowed to come home with you.
How the fuck is this abused by people to get.into the country? The parents already have to be citizens.
And birthright citizenship is about as sacred an American policy as it gets.
It's no use. Retards like him don't look at facts. You can post the 14th ammendment all day and they'll find a way around it and deflect deflect deflect. Like he's doing here with the anchor baby discussion. -
2019-11-13 at 5:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by 6011UM No I didnt.
It's no use. Retards like him don't look at facts. You can post the 14th ammendment all day and they'll find a way around it and deflect deflect deflect. Like he's doing here with the anchor baby discussion.
those ammendments are merely suggestions, not sacred words of gods that americans must live by. -
2019-11-13 at 5:51 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 5:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 no, it was originally designed for a good purpose, but like all good things, it became a misuse way to enter this Nation illegally.
but honestly, it's difficult to know who is sincere and who is here by way of criminal.
and now that these Laws have been reinforced, you will find both. and that is enough to still continue the process because you are keeping out what you want to let in legally!!
no it isn't, the fuck are you on about? this is nothing to do with illegal immigration.
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country I'm pretty sure there are diplomatic officers you can talk to if that happens.
no its fine, you just travel home and register your baby the same as if you'd had in at home. you could probably go to your embassy in that country to get the passport and/or visa sorted so you have less trouble at customs. but either way, no matter what country you're from, you can always easily take your new born home and register them. nobody is going to expect you to register your child as a foreign citizen just because you happened to give birth while travelling.
. -
2019-11-13 at 5:55 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 5:57 PM UTCI know a Chinese person who was considering taking his gf to the US to give birth. You then have dual citizenship for the kid, as the US has birthright citizenship. They didn't in the end, but it's a good example of how dumb and slow to change the US is. We got rid of birthright citizenship back in the 00s. Of course all the freaks were complaining about how dat be racis, etc.
-
2019-11-13 at 5:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker The rule of law is why our Republic has so long endured.
no its not.
the human race was getting along just fine for tens of thousands of years before control freaks came along with all their ideas on how to control others to their own will in order to benefit themselves at the expense of others.
. -
2019-11-13 at 5:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc no it isn't, the fuck are you on about? this is nothing to do with illegal immigration.
hey shit for brains, it was not illegal immigration until we figured out how it was being used that way.
like the expiring visa and marrying a citizen Law.
they have been looking into these visa rules and connecting them to illegal immigration.
anyway a foreigner gets here, can now be viewed as a way an illegal is trying to get here!! -
2019-11-13 at 5:59 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 5:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country I know a Chinese person who was considering taking his gf to the US to give birth. You then have dual citizenship for the kid, as the US has birthright citizenship. They didn't in the end, but it's a good example of how dumb and slow to change the US is. We got rid of birthright citizenship back in the 00s. Of course all the freaks were complaining about how dat be racis, etc.
Would you report him and have him prosecuted if you could? -
2019-11-13 at 6:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Not without a birth certificate
Regardless of birth certificate, he is a born citizen as his mother was American.
https://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/citizenship-through-parentsChildren of U.S. Citizens Residing Outside the United States
Children residing outside of the United States may obtain citizenship under Section 322 of the INA. A child who regularly resides outside of the United States is eligible for naturalization if all of the following conditions have been met:
The child has at least one parent, including an adoptive parent, who is a U.S. citizen by birth or through naturalization;
Cited chapter:
https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-h-chapter-5 -
2019-11-13 at 6:08 PM UTC
-
2019-11-13 at 6:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country I know a Chinese person who was considering taking his gf to the US to give birth. You then have dual citizenship for the kid, as the US has birthright citizenship. They didn't in the end, but it's a good example of how dumb and slow to change the US is. We got rid of birthright citizenship back in the 00s. Of course all the freaks were complaining about how dat be racis, etc.
Thats not how it works lol. You need at least a green card. So, a legal resident. You can't just go on vacation and do it. -
2019-11-13 at 6:10 PM UTC
