User Controls
Can we just dox Wariat and be done with it?
-
2019-11-03 at 12:16 PM UTCIIRC his name sounds better backwards
-
2019-11-03 at 12:21 PM UTC
-
2019-11-03 at 12:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo what you seek is contained in this thread
https://niggasin.space/thread/40306?p=3
I remember reading that thread, then you came in and dropped that bomb, and the whole thread changed drastically. -
2019-11-03 at 1:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo what you seek is contained in this thread
https://niggasin.space/thread/40306?p=3Police wanted a higher bail amount because they believe Lata is “a real danger to the community,” Chief Bob Pasero said.
So basically he tried to explain to them why 12 year old girls might actually enjoy being molested.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-11-03 at 3:23 PM UTCI.... I don't think there's much we can do with his pi. I mean, there's no way his family doesn't know he's a pedo at this point, he's already been arrested for it. Like, what do we really do that would make his life worse?
-
2019-11-03 at 6:16 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-11-03 at 10:20 PM UTC
(Super. Ct. No. 09NCR07158)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Nicholson , Acting P. J.
P. v. Lata
CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
An information alleged the 24-year-old defendant Maciej Wieslaw Lata had contacted and arranged meetings, by way of the so-called "MySpace" Web site on the Internet, with a 12-year-old minor with the intent to commit an act of molestation. Pursuant to a negotiated plea, the prosecutor amended the information to include a count of misdemeanor child annoyance, to which defendant entered his plea of guilty in exchange for dismissal of three permutations of section 288 felonies and the grant of probation conditioned on a jail term of less than 180 days. The offense subjected defendant to mandatory registration as a sex offender. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. © [undesignated section references will be to this code].)
At the sentencing hearing (which went untranscribed because it was held on the misdemeanor calendar), defendant objected to the registration requirement on a basis not specified in the court's minutes. The court granted probation in accordance with the agreed disposition, imposing the registration requirement. Defendant filed a notice of appeal without requesting a certificate of probable cause (CPC).
Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that the mandatory registration requirement for child annoyance violates his right to equal protection because section 290 does not also include solicitation for prostitution within its ambit even though the proscribed conduct could be similar. We affirm the order granting probation.
Our resolution of the issue does not require consideration of the factual basis for defendant's plea. We thus omit it.
DISCUSSION
The People initially contend the constitutionality of defendant's registration requirement is not an issue cognizable on appeal because he did not obtain a CPC. This mandatory consequence of his guilty plea is not a negotiable element of his plea, and therefore a challenge to it is not tantamount to an attack on the validity of his plea that would otherwise be subject to a CPC prerequisite. (People v. Hernandez (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 641, 647-648 [disapproved in People v. Picklesimer (2010) 48 Cal.4th 330, 338, fn. 4, as to holding that challenge to registration requirement can be via postjudgment motion]; cf. People v. McClellan (1993) 6 Cal.4th 367, 380 [imposition of registration requirement did not violate terms of plea because it is not a subject of negotiation]; see 6 Witkin & Epstein, Cal. Criminal Law (3d ed. 2011 supp.), Criminal Appeal, § 16, p. 67.)
The right to equal protection under the law (U.S. Const., 14th Amend.; Cal. Const., art. I, § 7), is the right to be treated similarly to those who are similarly situated. (People v. Jones (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 220, 227; People v. Hofsheier (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1185, 1199 (Hofsheier).) One who claims a violation of this right therefore has the essential prerequisite of demonstrating that a legislative classification affects two or more similarly situated groups differently. (Hofsheier, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 1199; In re Randy J. (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1497, 1506.)
"Legislative classification is the act of specifying who will and who will not come within the operation of a particular law." (Connerly v. State Personnel Bd. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 16, 32.)
As an initial matter, we note that the principles of equal protection do not apply where identical conduct is subject to prosecution under more than one statute, resulting in different punishments for different defendants. This is simply a function of prosecutorial discretion. (People v. Honan (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 175, 183; People v. Taylor (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 318, 323; see Manduley v. Superior Court …
http://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20110628_0004326.CA.htm/qx -
2019-11-03 at 10:23 PM UTC
A Chico, Calif., man accused of trying to arrange meetings with a 12-year-old Orland girl he met online appeared briefly in court Friday morning, but did not enter a plea.
Maciej Wieslaw Lata, 24, was arrested May 26 at Lely Aquatic Park in Orland, following a month-long sting operation set up by the Orland Police Department. He faces one count of communicating with a minor with intent to commit lewd or lascivious acts and two counts of attempting to arrange meetings with a minor with intent to commit lewd or lascivious acts – all felonies.
If convicted, he faces between 5 to 7 years in prison and would be required to register as a sex offender.
Lata’s attorney, Dane A. Cameron, on Friday asked Judge Donald C. Byrd for a week to allow him time to get caught up on the case.
Lata remained in custody Friday in Glenn County Jail in lieu of $500,000 bail.
Police were contacted in early May by the girl’s parents after Lata allegedly made “inappropriate” advances through her MySpace page. Online conversations between Lata and a person he believed was the 12-year-old continued. However, Lata was actually communicating with an Orland police officer, police said.
Lata attempted twice to meet the girl. At the first meeting May 16 in Aquatic Park Lata reportedly struck up a conversation with an undercover officer assigned to wait for him, asking if anyone had seen the 12-year-old.
At the second meeting, on May 26, Lata was arrested. Police served a search warrant at Lata’s Chico home and seized four computers at the same time he was being arrested in Orland.
Lata posted a $10,000 bail bond the same day and was released.
The girl’s family filed for a restraining order against Lata on May 28 and expressed frustration about his release. In court documents, the family alleged that Lata told the girl she was “beautiful,” “gorgeous,” and “that he thinks about her constantly.”
The family requested a 150-yeard stay-away order, claiming their daughter was “afraid to even switch classes during school.”
Lata was re-arrested May 30 after Judge Roy G. Macfarland revoked his bail bond at the request of Orland police. Police wanted a higher bail amount because they believe Lata is “a real danger to the community,” Chief Bob Pasero said.
Pasero said police do not believe Lata attempted to contact the victim while he was out of jail.
Lata is set to appear again June 12 in Glenn County Superior Court.
https://protectthekids.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/maciej-wieslaw-lata-appears-in-court-on-molestation-charges/ -
2019-11-03 at 10:25 PM UTC
^^^ Absolutely doesnt fuck kids
it was RAPHAEL LUCIANO -
2019-11-03 at 10:28 PM UTC
SANTA CRUZ – A man was jailed after a Friday night brawl at Brady”s Yacht Club on Seabright Avenue, after he allegedly struck another patron with a pint glass, police records show.
Maciej Wieslaw Lata, 28, remained in jail Monday, records show.
He was arrested on suspicion of assault at about 8:30 p.m. Friday, with bail set at $25,000. -
2019-11-03 at 10:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by CASPER
^^^ Absolutely doesnt fuck kids
it was RAPHAEL LUCIANO
Raphael luciano fucks kids and is a cult leader wnd child abuser who starved his own 15 children and used them as shields against me trying to bait me to attack. He is also an actual child molester who uses sex with his fsmilya s a way to further his blood line and cult. -
2019-11-03 at 10:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat Raphael luciano fucks kids and is a cult leader wnd child abuser who starved his own 15 children and used them as shields against me trying to bait me to attack. He is also an actual child molester who uses sex with his fsmilya s a way to further his blood line and cult.
Well then it sounds like you guys should have a lot in common. -
2019-11-03 at 10:33 PM UTC
-
2019-11-03 at 10:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat Raphael luciano fucks kids and is a cult leader wnd child abuser who starved his own 15 children and used them as shields against me trying to bait me to attack. He is also an actual child molester who uses sex with his fsmilya s a way to further his blood line and cult.
come to canada -
2019-11-03 at 11:08 PM UTC
-
2019-11-03 at 11:12 PM UTCI domt look at that pornography nor does it do anything for me. In fact I am wuitting sll pornography as it is interferring with my social life. But what makes you think I have anything to do with thwt shit when i clewrly said multiple times it was yrs ago and multiple other people on this foruma dmitted to also running into it at one point in their lives or some still may be regulars?
Me being willing to fuck 16-17 yr olds has nothing to do with pornography or peodphilia its even legal here if theyre not batshit crazy and will lie or claim something thwt didnt or have batshit crazy parents thwt will find out. Fuking a 16-17 yr old is still a riskd espite being legal but regular sex with no risk is boring anyway isnt it? -
2019-11-03 at 11:15 PM UTCJust because youre mad thwt you cant legally fuck a 16-17 yr old in your country and i can doesnt mean you hate to take it out on me or make up a story with some guy you found.
-
2019-11-03 at 11:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat I domt look at that pornography nor does it do anything for me. In fact I am wuitting sll pornography as it is interferring with my social life. But what makes you think I have anything to do with thwt shit when i clewrly said multiple times it was yrs ago and multiple other people on this foruma dmitted to also running into it at one point in their lives or some still may be regulars?
Me being willing to fuck 16-17 yr olds has nothing to do with pornography or peodphilia its even legal here if theyre not batshit crazy and will lie or claim something thwt didnt or have batshit crazy parents thwt will find out. Fuking a 16-17 yr old is still a riskd espite being legal but regular sex with no risk is boring anyway isnt it?
What about a 12 year old? Still fair game? -
2019-11-03 at 11:20 PM UTCI am 35 now thus my tastes evolved. I think either a cougar or girls wround 16-17 would be more of a challenge or a score for me.
-
2019-11-04 at 12:13 AM UTC
