2019-11-03 at 3:47 PM UTC
Wariat
Marine/Preteen Biologist
Casper,
I posted a response or retort and torn apart your replies in this thread but decided to erase them. Did you read them. I am sure the ones who did know I have a point. I even twlked wbout my esperiences in life with close calls or situations that showed me signs my hypothesis or the original hypothesis of this thread has some barring.
2019-11-03 at 3:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat
Casper,
I posted a response or retort and torn apart your replies in this thread but decided to erase them. Did you read them. I am sure the ones who did know I have a point. I even twlked wbout my esperiences in life with close calls or situations that showed me signs my hypothesis or the original hypothesis of this thread has some barring.
Dude. It sucks for you that you're attracted to little girls but that doesnt change the fact that they're off limits. Just forget it. Ninety million threads here isnt gonna change anything. It does nothing but reiterate how sick your brain is, as if it isnt already abundantly clear. You're not going to change anyone's minds. Like Caspo said, its demonstratably unhealthy the level of infatuation you exhibit. Move on. Or drift into the sun. Thank you.
User was banned for saying the taboo phrase "girl"!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-03 at 4:57 PM UTC
Grylls
Cum Looking Faggot
[abrade this vocal tread-softly]
i didnt even have to try lol
2019-11-03 at 10:27 PM UTC
Wariat
Marine/Preteen Biologist
First of all thats not why deleted them. I was tired talkingto myself snd no one intellectually being able to respond to me and waiting for your reply. Secondly me stwting my opinion is not illegal so again this wasnt my reason. Plus, you have no proof i am who you think and im on a vpn that jeepsmno logs anyway. But i have the right of my opinion and freedom of speech.
2019-11-03 at 10:29 PM UTC
(Super. Ct. No. 09NCR07158)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Nicholson , Acting P. J.
P. v. Lata
CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
An information alleged the 24-year-old defendant Maciej Wieslaw Lata had contacted and arranged meetings, by way of the so-called "MySpace" Web site on the Internet, with a 12-year-old minor with the intent to commit an act of molestation. Pursuant to a negotiated plea, the prosecutor amended the information to include a count of misdemeanor child annoyance, to which defendant entered his plea of guilty in exchange for dismissal of three permutations of section 288 felonies and the grant of probation conditioned on a jail term of less than 180 days. The offense subjected defendant to mandatory registration as a sex offender. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. © [undesignated section references will be to this code].)
At the sentencing hearing (which went untranscribed because it was held on the misdemeanor calendar), defendant objected to the registration requirement on a basis not specified in the court's minutes. The court granted probation in accordance with the agreed disposition, imposing the registration requirement. Defendant filed a notice of appeal without requesting a certificate of probable cause (CPC).
Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that the mandatory registration requirement for child annoyance violates his right to equal protection because section 290 does not also include solicitation for prostitution within its ambit even though the proscribed conduct could be similar. We affirm the order granting probation.
Our resolution of the issue does not require consideration of the factual basis for defendant's plea. We thus omit it.
DISCUSSION
The People initially contend the constitutionality of defendant's registration requirement is not an issue cognizable on appeal because he did not obtain a CPC. This mandatory consequence of his guilty plea is not a negotiable element of his plea, and therefore a challenge to it is not tantamount to an attack on the validity of his plea that would otherwise be subject to a CPC prerequisite. (People v. Hernandez (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 641, 647-648 [disapproved in People v. Picklesimer (2010) 48 Cal.4th 330, 338, fn. 4, as to holding that challenge to registration requirement can be via postjudgment motion]; cf. People v. McClellan (1993) 6 Cal.4th 367, 380 [imposition of registration requirement did not violate terms of plea because it is not a subject of negotiation]; see 6 Witkin & Epstein, Cal. Criminal Law (3d ed. 2011 supp.), Criminal Appeal, § 16, p. 67.)
The right to equal protection under the law (U.S. Const., 14th Amend.; Cal. Const., art. I, § 7), is the right to be treated similarly to those who are similarly situated. (People v. Jones (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 220, 227; People v. Hofsheier (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1185, 1199 (Hofsheier).) One who claims a violation of this right therefore has the essential prerequisite of demonstrating that a legislative classification affects two or more similarly situated groups differently. (Hofsheier, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 1199; In re Randy J. (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1497, 1506.)
"Legislative classification is the act of specifying who will and who will not come within the operation of a particular law." (Connerly v. State Personnel Bd. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 16, 32.)
As an initial matter, we note that the principles of equal protection do not apply where identical conduct is subject to prosecution under more than one statute, resulting in different punishments for different defendants. This is simply a function of prosecutorial discretion. (People v. Honan (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 175, 183; People v. Taylor (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 318, 323; see Manduley v. Superior Court …
http://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20110628_0004326.CA.htm/qx
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-03 at 10:30 PM UTC
A Chico, Calif., man accused of trying to arrange meetings with a 12-year-old Orland girl he met online appeared briefly in court Friday morning, but did not enter a plea.
Maciej Wieslaw Lata, 24, was arrested May 26 at Lely Aquatic Park in Orland, following a month-long sting operation set up by the Orland Police Department. He faces one count of communicating with a minor with intent to commit lewd or lascivious acts and two counts of attempting to arrange meetings with a minor with intent to commit lewd or lascivious acts – all felonies.
If convicted, he faces between 5 to 7 years in prison and would be required to register as a sex offender.
Lata’s attorney, Dane A. Cameron, on Friday asked Judge Donald C. Byrd for a week to allow him time to get caught up on the case.
Lata remained in custody Friday in Glenn County Jail in lieu of $500,000 bail.
Police were contacted in early May by the girl’s parents after Lata allegedly made “inappropriate” advances through her MySpace page. Online conversations between Lata and a person he believed was the 12-year-old continued. However, Lata was actually communicating with an Orland police officer, police said.
Lata attempted twice to meet the girl. At the first meeting May 16 in Aquatic Park Lata reportedly struck up a conversation with an undercover officer assigned to wait for him, asking if anyone had seen the 12-year-old.
At the second meeting, on May 26, Lata was arrested. Police served a search warrant at Lata’s Chico home and seized four computers at the same time he was being arrested in Orland.
Lata posted a $10,000 bail bond the same day and was released.
The girl’s family filed for a restraining order against Lata on May 28 and expressed frustration about his release. In court documents, the family alleged that Lata told the girl she was “beautiful,” “gorgeous,” and “that he thinks about her constantly.”
The family requested a 150-yeard stay-away order, claiming their daughter was “afraid to even switch classes during school.”
Lata was re-arrested May 30 after Judge Roy G. Macfarland revoked his bail bond at the request of Orland police. Police wanted a higher bail amount because they believe Lata is “a real danger to the community,” Chief Bob Pasero said.
Pasero said police do not believe Lata attempted to contact the victim while he was out of jail.
Lata is set to appear again June 12 in Glenn County Superior Court.
https://protectthekids.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/maciej-wieslaw-lata-appears-in-court-on-molestation-charges/
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-11-03 at 10:32 PM UTC
Wariat
Marine/Preteen Biologist
You have no proof that is me.
2019-11-03 at 10:33 PM UTC
Wariat
Marine/Preteen Biologist
Lol that could,literally be anybody.
2019-11-03 at 10:47 PM UTC
Wariat
Marine/Preteen Biologist
You really buy that shit dawg? Those chicks who yrs later accuse someone prominent or powerful of something out of the blue after yrs? I get it with incent or child shit but any teen girl like those swimemrs? Dome on. Ask yourself if theyre not opportunists wanting a free ride in life or some eays money why they never do it to a poor guy?
2019-11-03 at 10:52 PM UTC
rofl. omg.
Did that argument work in court the first time?
Your pictures are archived. Your twitter handle is your fucking name dude. Google image search shows no other location for any of the photos youve posted, so unless you have a weird inFATuation with some shlubby looking kiddy fucking white dude, and took a bunch of pictures of him...
How have you been on the internet this long and still be so stupid?
2019-11-03 at 10:54 PM UTC
Yes youre a very poor guy who just HAPPENED to be at an aquarium trying to fuck a child.
rofllololololololllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllolololol
And you plead guilty out of the goodness of your heart and concern for an overworked criminal justice system.
Save it for court, buckaroo.
2019-11-03 at 10:55 PM UTC
Wariat
Marine/Preteen Biologist
My twitter got deleted by twitter multiple times and my name is shared by millions of people in Poland.
Americsn court csnt touch me buckoo ever again.
2019-11-03 at 10:57 PM UTC
Wariat
Marine/Preteen Biologist
Again you have absolutely no proof still and you will never have it.
2019-11-03 at 11:03 PM UTC
Wariat
Marine/Preteen Biologist
Lol you finding that example out of your hat with someone who shares similar life stories and a first name with me. But lets entertsin you: what in thst wrtivle says thst they have proof the guy would have fuked or rape or did anything against the will toward anyone? Besides some hick usa racism he is polish? I hope russia treats your visitors or tourists in a simialr fashion if they ever touch their courts.
Btw, pretty handsome fellow you found there.
2019-11-04 at 1:06 AM UTC
Originally posted by CASPER
TOTALLY NOT YOU
fucking doof
Pathetic Faggot
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
