User Controls
US Navy futuretek patents thread
-
2019-10-26 at 1:25 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny travelling at a straight line, ie, no intelligence required.
either a space rock or some old satelite slowly losing its altitude.
It's floating above the surface of water. The shot is taken from above. Supposedly it displays G-forces many times what would kill a human. -
2019-10-26 at 6:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi It's floating above the surface of water. The shot is taken from above. Supposedly it displays G-forces many times what would kill a human.
yes, anything that travels above a body of water can be called 'floatimg above the surface of water'. even our moom.
and yes, space rocks and old defunct satelites dont contain any animals, human or inhuman, inside them. -
2019-10-26 at 6:25 AM UTC
-
2019-10-26 at 9:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny yes, anything that travels above a body of water can be called 'floatimg above the surface of water'. even our moom.
and yes, space rocks and old defunct satelites dont contain any animals, human or inhuman, inside them.
It's taken from above by a recon plane. Meteors and shit don't cruise over the surface at low altitude lmao, orbital mechanics don't work like that. Also random flying objects don't accelerate nod flight out of nowhere.
There were several navy jets that got really close to it and said it was doing shit no human craft let alone random celestial detritus could do, such as water to air transition seamlessly. -
2019-10-26 at 9:43 AM UTCLess BS filled, full length video including acceleration
https://www.history.com/topics/paranormal/uss-nimitz-tic-tac-ufo-declassified-video -
2019-10-26 at 4:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi It's taken from above by a recon plane. Meteors and shit don't cruise over the surface at low altitude lmao, orbital mechanics don't work like that.
speculations.Also random flying objects don't accelerate nod flight out of nowhere.
i didnt see it acclerate.There were several navy jets that got really close to it and said it was doing shit no human craft let alone random celestial detritus could do, such as water to air transition seamlessly.
words. -
2019-10-26 at 7:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny speculations.
First one is taken from above by a FLIR system.
No, meteors don't cruise over the ocean and accelerate mid flight.i didnt see it acclerate.
Watch the History channel link, it accelerates and loses the FLIR tracking system. This one is from below.words.
Testimony from a whole squadron of fighter pilots, some of whom are heard in the video. Cmdr David Fravor is the one who talks about the auto track. Watch his interview with Joe Rogan. I find it hard to believe he is lying or mistaken. -
2019-10-26 at 8:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by Kuntzschutz I'm starting to think this is all a hoax. Interestingly bismuth has been found to be a superconductor when at a low enough temperature, which is strange due to it's properties compared to other superconductors. Based on the modern theory, it should not really be a superconductor at all due to the charge density.
I remember a guy years ago in the free energy community that claimed bismuth could be a room temperature superconductor, and it was not this guy who filed the patents. But it seems to have been scrubbed from google search results. This is all probably a psyop. That's not to say they won't finally discover a room temperature superconductor some day. I'm sure they will.
Luigi, is this you?
explain the direct or cross over to wire up solar panels to batteries to me again
whatever term -
2019-10-27 at 4:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi First one is taken from above by a FLIR system.
No, meteors don't cruise over the ocean and accelerate mid flight.
not every space debris have to have density of a rock. do you know assbestos, gypsum ? other planets have these low density minerals too and when they enter the earths atmosphere they get slowed down to subsonic speed and they just glide in the air.
and one possible reason that it acclerated was because it went into a different layer of atmosphere that flowed in a different direction. or maybe the plane slowed down.Watch the History channel link, it accelerates and loses the FLIR tracking system. This one is from below.
i cant. its bloked.Testimony from a whole squadron of fighter pilots, some of whom are heard in the video. Cmdr David Fravor is the one who talks about the auto track. Watch his interview with Joe Rogan. I find it hard to believe he is lying or mistaken.
their testimony means jack shit. remember "thats their fault for bringing their kids into battle" ?
thats right. the US military is made up mostly of these type of people. -
2019-10-27 at 6:22 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny not every space debris have to have density of a rock. do you know assbestos, gypsum ? other planets have these low density minerals too and when they enter the earths atmosphere they get slowed down to subsonic speed and they just glide in the air.
and one possible reason that it acclerated was because it went into a different layer of atmosphere that flowed in a different direction. or maybe the plane slowed down.
No you're retarded, I don't know why the fuck every time we have a conversation it's you insisting on being a retard and resisting all evidence until I have to nail your asshole wide open.
Space rocks don't just cruise, it would need to have a very low angle of entry and would burn up, this is a well defined non-burning (since we have FLIR image) object travelling at cruise speed then it massively accelerates off screen to lose the FLIR. Different layers of atmosphere don't do shit to impart huge velocity upon a rock supposedly aerodynamic enough to enter the lower atmosphere without disintegrating. You are fucking retarded if you believe a rock entering a different layer of gas can suddenly give it multiple times its existing velocity. Where is the energy coming from?their testimony means jack shit. remember "thats their fault for bringing their kids into battle" ?
thats right. the US military is made up mostly of these type of people.
Your prejudgement based off some other shit even means more jack shit. To watch the interview. If you think the dude is lying or mistaken,
say what you take issue with. -
2019-10-27 at 4 PM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi No you're retarded, I don't know why the fuck every time we have a conversation it's you insisting on being a retard and resisting all evidence until I have to nail your asshole wide open.
no u.Space rocks don't just cruise, it would need to have a very low angle of entry and would burn up,
unless its very light, like asbestos or gypsum or some other light minerals.
and different layers in the atmosphere have different densities and wind directions.
Your prejudgement based off some other shit even means more jack shit. To watch the interview. If you think the dude is lying or mistaken,
say what you take issue with.
sure. wait till it unblocks me. -
2019-10-27 at 9:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny unless its very light, like asbestos or gypsum or some other light minerals.
and different layers in the atmosphere have different densities and wind directions.
There is no amount of pressure or temperature difference not regular airflow that will accelerate a rock fast enough to lose FLIR autotracking. But even before that, it would burn up. But there is no ram pressure fireball observable either. -
2019-10-28 at 3:18 AM UTCI'm lost. don't understand how you have weaving from different temperature lines vs kilometer
Are you saying things burn up at 300 degrees Kelvin at 100 kilometers up but might burn at 1000 degrees Kelvin at 150k up and then below it starts rising up again in order for the object to burn up.. like at 700. so it would burn up at 1000 degrees at 150k, 300 at 100 and 700 at say 50k? -
2019-10-30 at 6:09 PM UTCI hope this shit doesn't drive up the price of bismuth. I still need a couple dozen pounds of it for some legit experiments. It's likely nothing will come of this, seeing as those older patents didn't not turn up much either.
-
2019-11-04 at 4:05 AM UTCThis video is pretty nuts too, I can't imagine what can maneuver it's own body like that at Mach 5+
-
2019-11-04 at 4:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi This video is pretty nuts too, I can't imagine what can maneuver it's own body like that at Mach 5+
I saw this years ago. and the guy who was a vietnam era pilot told me this panel was not real. the instrument was nothing like the real thing. but it has since been confirmed. so the Man clearly defended the old NDA or NTS (Never Tell Shit.. never admit shit to anyone)
because we know it's real now. so half of Mach 1 is about 380-400 mph? it couldn't be a bird caught in a jet stream? what do you guys think it was.. a small aircraft or jet just hooking it for funz? -
2019-11-04 at 4:12 AM UTC
-
2019-11-04 at 12:25 PM UTC
-
2019-11-04 at 12:28 PM UTC
-
2019-11-04 at 12:32 PM UTC
