User Controls
Did existence begin or is it eternal?
-
2019-10-23 at 3:48 PM UTCironically, salary to many within a business infrastructure indicates your placement within that company. it supposedly indicates the level of responsibilities you are assigned. and also indicates the number of successful accomplishments.
the one who does the most gets paid the most
like nature:
fastest eats the mostest!!
my reasoning however, by using a salary comparison, is to indicate levels of Responsibility. because in the world of infrastructure, Responsibility means that's where the thinking ability to problem solve exists at, it's a literal sharks feast... -
2019-10-23 at 4:04 PM UTCfor those who might struggle with the under lining meaning here:
Responsibility, based by salary, equals someone being paid to"Problem Solve."
and since the majority of this world's population lack the ability to properly assess and then problem solve, that means it's them SHARKS getting paid top fish to do the thinking for the rest.
so, in this topic of who and what are eternal vs not, my views outshine your problematic suggestions all day long. -
2019-10-23 at 4:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 ironically, salary to many within a business infrastructure indicates your placement within that company. it supposedly indicates the level of responsibilities you are assigned. and also indicates the number of successful accomplishments.
the one who does the most gets paid the most
like nature:
fastest eats the mostest!!
my reasoning however, by using a salary comparison, is to indicate levels of Responsibility. because in the world of infrastructure, Responsibility means that's where the thinking ability to problem solve exists at, it's a literal sharks feast…
can you explain to me why CEOs who ran their banks to the ground back in 08/09 get millions in bonuses ?
what kind of responsibility was that ? -
2019-10-23 at 4:31 PM UTC
-
2019-10-23 at 5:10 PM UTC
-
2019-10-23 at 5:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 ironically, salary to many within a business infrastructure indicates your placement within that company. it supposedly indicates the level of responsibilities you are assigned. and also indicates the number of successful accomplishments.
the one who does the most gets paid the most
like nature:
fastest eats the mostest!!
my reasoning however, by using a salary comparison, is to indicate levels of Responsibility. because in the world of infrastructure, Responsibility means that's where the thinking ability to problem solve exists at, it's a literal sharks feast…
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 for those who might struggle with the under lining meaning here:
Responsibility, based by salary, equals someone being paid to"Problem Solve."
and since the majority of this world's population lack the ability to properly assess and then problem solve, that means it's them SHARKS getting paid top fish to do the thinking for the rest.
so, in this topic of who and what are eternal vs not, my views outshine your problematic suggestions all day long.
No offense but this is a typical thing subordinates say to make themselves feel better for being a cog who doesn't get to make real decisions or make the real money, just execute someone else's decisions and make them the real money :) -
2019-10-23 at 5:44 PM UTC
-
2019-10-23 at 6:39 PM UTC
-
2019-10-23 at 7:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi No offense but this is a typical thing subordinates say to make themselves feel better for being a cog who doesn't get to make real decisions or make the real money, just execute someone else's decisions and make them the real money :)
nah, it's what assholes say to you online. even though life is good on my end, it's still all about what i can do, am i able, and how well i keep the skills i have doing the things needed in order to maintain living good. outside of education, experience, and the required skills needed, much of my success comes from a great deal of "Common Sense," which happens to be the thing that keeps my paychecks flowing.
but i am not trying to pull a fast over on you by anything i post. however, i am most certain due to understanding the intimate world of Mathematics and what Stephen Hawking was claiming that what i have posted is spot on "Correct!!" -
2019-10-23 at 7:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 nah, it's what assholes say to you online. even though life is good on my end, it's still all about what i can do, am i able, and how well i keep the skills i have doing the things needed in order to maintain living good. outside of education, experience, and the required skills needed, much of my success comes from a great deal of "Common Sense," which happens to be the thing that keeps my paychecks flowing.
but i am not trying to pull a fast over on you by anything i post. however, i am most certain due to understanding the intimate world of Mathematics and what Stephen Hawking was claiming that what i have posted is spot on "Correct!!"
You grossly misunderstand orbital dynamics if you believe a small perturbation would send us veering into doom. -
2019-10-23 at 7:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi You grossly misunderstand orbital dynamics if you believe a small perturbation would send us veering into doom.
and you obviously do not comprehend what Stephen Hawking's was claiming.
example:
the planet Venus can never sustain or be able to induce Life because it is TOO CLOSE to the Sun.
the planet Mars once had life/water/evidence of oxygen, but now is a frozen tundra of red dust because it is TOO FAR from the Sun.
so to have Life, to Sustain Life, and to continue creating Life, you cannot be TOO CLOSE nor TOO FAR to/from the Sun.
and where the Earth currently sits in position (distance) from the Sun, we are Perfect. but just mere increments CLOSER or AWAY from our current position would destroy Life currently on Planet Earth!! -
2019-10-23 at 7:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 and you obviously do not comprehend what Stephen Hawking's was claiming.
example:
the planet Venus can never sustain or be able to induce Life because it is TOO CLOSE to the Sun.
the planet Mars once had life/water/evidence of oxygen, but now is a frozen tundra of red dust because it is TOO FAR from the Sun.
so to have Life, to Sustain Life, and to continue creating Life, you cannot be TOO CLOSE nor TOO FAR to/from the Sun.
and where the Earth currently sits in position (distance) from the Sun, we are Perfect. but just mere increments CLOSER or AWAY from our current position would destroy Life currently on Planet Earth!!
You are aware that our orbit isn't circular, right?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-10-23 at 7:20 PM UTC
-
2019-10-23 at 7:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 the orbit is based upon the Laws of Physics in connection to our nearests Planets, Moons, Stars, and Sun. So as long as it remains within the Laws we are golden.
No like it is literally elliptical. The earth's distance to the sun varies by almost 5 million miles through the year. -
2019-10-23 at 7:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 and you obviously do not comprehend what Stephen Hawking's was claiming.
example:
the planet Venus can never sustain or be able to induce Life because it is TOO CLOSE to the Sun.
the planet Mars once had life/water/evidence of oxygen, but now is a frozen tundra of red dust because it is TOO FAR from the Sun.
so to have Life, to Sustain Life, and to continue creating Life, you cannot be TOO CLOSE nor TOO FAR to/from the Sun.
and where the Earth currently sits in position (distance) from the Sun, we are Perfect. but just mere increments CLOSER or AWAY from our current position would destroy Life currently on Planet Earth!!
We're actually too close, that's why we have the tropics and the deserts. If we were back a bit we'd be better off.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-10-23 at 7:24 PM UTCThis is actually how our solar system is carried through space at 70,000kph, dragged inside a vortex behind the Sun.
-
2019-10-23 at 7:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi No like it is literally elliptical. The earth's distance to the sun varies by almost 5 million miles through the year.
nothing happens without the Laws of Physics n play and those Laws require the Sun, objects, Planets, Stars, Moons to be able to properly keep Earth in orbit.
it's a giant magnet, that is what the Laws of Physics are from gravity, electromagnetics, energy, force.
this is basic Science... -
2019-10-23 at 7:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by iam_asiam68 nothing happens without the Laws of Physics n play and those Laws require the Sun, objects, Planets, Stars, Moons to be able to properly keep Earth in orbit.
it's a giant magnet, that is what the Laws of Physics are from gravity, electromagnetics, energy, force.
this is basic Science…
Gravity isn't a matter of electromagnetism. Are you a terrible troll? Or is this real? -
2019-10-23 at 8:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Big League jedi Gravity isn't a matter of electromagnetism. Are you a terrible troll? Or is this real?
are you literally this STUPID for real?
where did i say Gravity was a part of electromagnetics?
i said it was a Law of Physics.
no wonder i keep thinking something is wrong with you. you don't even read what someone posts correctly and then reply based upon your insignificant amount of data. you are just really that "STUPID!!" -
2019-10-23 at 8:25 PM UTC
