User Controls
Oh boy...
-
2017-01-14 at 7:37 AM UTC
Alot keep asking me why I like things I like or pictures I have and idk but I know that I am a slut and think I am here for people to touch and do thingsto. Like some boys touch me but I do that to myself and I think about it all day and want alot of things that I know other girls dont want. So like why is that bad then? I dont want people saying that I shouldnt think about that stuff or that I dont know what it would be like bc I spank myself, put things inside me and rub them hard and pull and i want guys that want to see me and tell me what I am. I stopped writing to people bc people are like shocked bc there are not alot of girls like me i guess and I would think why are people not treating me the way I should be. And OMG people saying even what I write for my profile is fake and Im fake and stuff just bc. I looked at like A LOT of other ones and wrote that for weeks before I put it on there bc I did want guys to like me and it said alot of other stuff I liked, like normal stuff I guess but also I know that it was about me and so im not important and shouldnt have worried about me so much bc guys are. Im going to again and keep doing it and please leave me alone if you dont know me and want to say I cant think what I think or be what I am ok. I’m going to say everything and make another blog with like just me thats private and delete this post later and only post on this blog pics and stuff of things I like and not me after I can do everything and some people can read this. But this is me. Im ok in school but I know Im not smart, and I think about alot of what my friends think about but also everyday I think about other things alot. I want to think about guys looking at me and thinking bad things and I wish they could tie me and cum on me and I like when guys say they want to hurt or that I should be or that they will rape me and do other things to my body really anything i like want to be like what?!
It's all fun and games until masterchan finds your deviant art.
http://ggirl4u.deviantart.com/
Now she is switching sites. Eh... What could possibly go wrong? -
2017-01-14 at 7:41 AM UTCMasterchan has a long standing tradition of breaking the 4th wall and actually stalking people in real life, lel.
-
2017-01-14 at 7:42 AM UTCSo she's some underage slut who's getting e-bullied by molesterchan? I feel like I'm missing context.
The bigger question is why the hell I can see her eye through her hair, what the fuck is happening here? It's like a poorly drawn anime or some shit -
2017-01-14 at 7:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny So she's some underage slut who's getting e-bullied by molesterchan? I feel like I'm missing context.
The bigger question is why the hell I can see her eye through her hair, what the fuck is happening here? It's like a poorly drawn anime or some shit
The point is, she is an underaged slut who doesn't know what she is getting into. Now that you mention it about her eye, lol i suppose you're right. Hadn't noticed that before. -
2017-01-14 at 9:44 AM UTCVans out front lads.
-
2017-01-14 at 10:14 AM UTCI always feel conflicted in these situations. On one hand i want to say YOLO, and hit her up on whatever social media she is at next and score l-lewd pictures and such. On the other hand i can't help but feel i am a supreme asshole if i take advantage of a young girl like that, especially one who doesn't seem particularly right in her mind. Because really what sane young teen girl would do this?
Now that i think of it, i would much rather make a young girl fall in love with me. But now that i think about that, what manner of insidious evil is that? No, no. Don't take advantage of the insane girl. Find a normal young girl and introduce her to all of this.
Moral dilemmas. It's hard to be a chronophile.
Here is a compromise, one that i can live with. Since the relation between an adult and a child is about the least voluntary you can get. In the sense of the power dynamic, it is morally right for me to act as if there was no power disparity and within that context make the girl want to choose to be with me. So do the best i can according to the situation, with regards to what i want, and what she(Whoever young girl not this GGirl specifically) wants.
Post last edited by Sophie at 2017-01-14T10:19:02.703888+00:00 -
2017-01-14 at 10:17 AM UTCHow old is she?
-
2017-01-14 at 10:19 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice How old is she?
Like 14. -
2017-01-14 at 10:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice How old is she?
More importantly what are your objections if any to my moral compromise? -
2017-01-14 at 10:52 AM UTC14 isn't even that young.
-
2017-01-14 at 10:53 AM UTC
Originally posted by Malice 14 isn't even that young.
I still think hebephilia is the most normal of the paraphilias -
2017-01-14 at 1:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie More importantly what are your objections if any to my moral compromise?
Rationalizing.
You know it's not right, but that's what you want, so you rationalize it.
Everyone does it in their own context.
At least you aren't an unrepentant molester. -
2017-01-14 at 1:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by HampTheToker Rationalizing.
You know it's not right, but that's what you want, so you rationalize it.
Everyone does it in their own context.
At least you aren't an unrepentant molester.
If the girl receives equal or greater value from the relationship than i do is it still wrong? What makes it wrong in the first place? Are any of your children girls? Are they cute? y u judge me br0? -
2017-01-14 at 2:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie If the girl receives equal or greater value from the relationship than i do is it still wrong? What makes it wrong in the first place? Are any of your children girls? Are they cute? y u judge me br0?
I've got all boys. They're going to be some little heart breakers for sure.
Anyway, I'll try to answer your question briefly.
Your logic assumes that some young girls are mature enough to make that choice, and that just isn't true. Most women have a story about sex that they regret, because they're influenced more by emotion than logic when it comes to sex. Taking advantage really isn't that hard, regardless of how you justify it. It'll always be one-sided because you can appreciate the consequences of your choices, and they can't. -
2017-01-14 at 3:02 PM UTC
Originally posted by HampTheToker Your logic assumes that some young girls are mature enough to make that choice, and that just isn't true.
Saying something "just isn't true" doesn't prove or disprove anything. How do you know some young girls are not mature enough to make that choice?
Originally posted by HampTheToker Most women have a story about sex that they regret, because they're influenced more by emotion than logic when it comes to sex.
Ok lets assume that's true, doesn't that hold true for women of all ages then? And should we protect women when they make stupid choices? How patronizing.
Originally posted by HampTheToker Taking advantage really isn't that hard, regardless of how you justify it.
What constitutes taking advantage of?
Originally posted by HampTheToker It'll always be one-sided because you can appreciate the consequences of your choices, and they can't.
Can we inform children of the consequences of their choices? If so, am i still wrong if i do exactly that? If not, why do bother disciplining children at all? -
2017-01-14 at 3:23 PM UTCshes an artist wat dont u get
-
2017-01-14 at 5:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Saying something "just isn't true" doesn't prove or disprove anything. How do you know some young girls are not mature enough to make that choice?
The overwhelming majority are not as proven time and again by law and reason therefore by most moral, ethical, scientific, or other standards. The exception doesn't prove the rule. It is true for most, and that's what matters.Ok lets assume that's true, doesn't that hold true for women of all ages then? And should we protect women when they make stupid choices? How patronizing.
We do protect women from their choices. Women's rights are basically centered on just that.What constitutes taking advantage of?
The power imbalance you think you can fake.Can we inform children of the consequences of their choices? If so, am i still wrong if i do exactly that? If not, why do bother disciplining children at all?
Yes, but children are children. Good parents try and fail daily to guide their children. That, too, is the essence of childhood. Trial and error until experience has taught it's lesson. Again, the exception doesn't prove the rule. Children will never be acceptable social prey for a grown man in any civil culture.
Still, there's nothing I can say to dissuade you, anyway. The heart wants what the heart wants, and at this point, I doubt that you could ever be reasoned out of your attraction for youngens. -
2017-01-14 at 5:11 PM UTCthis may develop nicely
-
2017-01-14 at 5:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by HampTheToker The overwhelming majority are not as proven time and again by law and reason therefore by most moral, ethical, scientific, or other standards. The exception doesn't prove the rule. It is true for most, and that's what matters.
We do protect women from their choices. Women's rights are basically centered on just that.
The power imbalance you think you can fake.
Yes, but children are children. Good parents try and fail daily to guide their children. That, too, is the essence of childhood. Trial and error until experience has taught it's lesson. Again, the exception doesn't prove the rule. Children will never be acceptable social prey for a grown man in any civil culture.
Still, there's nothing I can say to dissuade you, anyway. The heart wants what the heart wants, and at this point, I doubt that you could ever be reasoned out of your attraction for youngens.
http://niggasin.space/thread/206?p=242#post-10538
Follow the above link to read Sophie's views on pedophilia as classified as a mental illness. -
2017-01-14 at 5:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by HampTheToker The overwhelming majority are not as proven time and again by law
I have literally no idea what that sentence means.
Originally posted by HampTheToker and reason therefore by most moral, ethical, scientific, or other standards.
So are you saying that because something is immoral and unethical in the eyes of the law it becomes a fact? Since when does the law equal morality? The law is just some words on paper.
Originally posted by HampTheToker The exception doesn't prove the rule. It is true for most, and that's what matters.
Again how do you know this? And don't tell me "because law and science breh". If there is any sort of factual science behind this claim i would encourage you to provide the relevant studies to support your claim.
Originally posted by HampTheToker We do protect women from their choices. Women's rights are basically centered on just that.
That's retarded. Also, how stupid do you think women are? That they need any sort of external force to protect them from bad decisions? Sounds like some type of white-knighting faggotry. Women have moral agency, therefore they are morally responsible for the choices that they make.
Originally posted by HampTheToker The power imbalance you think you can fake.
I already addressed this by saying that in the case the relation is the least voluntary, i should make it my business to act as if the person in question had all the power to leave/resist/whatever and even then be good to them so that even if there were no power disparity they would choose to be with me.
Originally posted by HampTheToker Yes, but children are children. Good parents try and fail daily to guide their children. That, too, is the essence of childhood. Trial and error until experience has taught it's lesson.
Ok then we agree, i can instruct them of the consequences of engaging in X activity with me and they can be all about childhood and do the trial and error business you speak of.
Originally posted by HampTheToker Again, the exception doesn't prove the rule. Children will never be acceptable social prey for a grown man in any civil culture.
Do you use the word "prey" when you speak of grownup women as well or only when you try to imply i am a predator?
Originally posted by HampTheToker Still, there's nothing I can say to dissuade you, anyway.
You can try, i am not arguing with you for shits and giggles i am open to hear a solid moral argument.
Originally posted by HampTheToker The heart wants what the heart wants, and at this point, I doubt that you could ever be reasoned out of your attraction for youngens.
Can you be reasoned out of your attraction to women?