Addressing the claim that whistleblower requirements changed right before Ukraine claims

1. 2019-10-01 at 11:13 PM UTC

   #21
   

   Grylls Cum Looking Faggot [abrade this vocal tread-softly]
   me?
2. 2019-10-01 at 11:15 PM UTC

   #22
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
   no, §m£ÂgØL, who's posted with two different accounts in this thread alone
3. 2019-10-02 at 12:10 AM UTC

   #23
   Gulm Yung Blood

   Originally posted by aldra no, §m£ÂgØL, who's posted with two different accounts in this thread alone

   
   Lanny has a limit on new accounts so you can only do 10 posts in a 24 hour period.
   
   I wonder though, are you only making personal attacks because you are afraid to admit that you were wrong?
   
   

   Originally posted by aldra https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/27/intel-community-secretly-gutted-requirement-of-first-hand-whistleblower-knowledge/
   
   interesting
   
   
   the form issued by the ODNI to grant political protection to whistleblowers was updated literally days before the Ukraine claim was made. Previously it only allowed protection for 'whistleblowers' who had/released direct evidence of wrongdoing; the change now allows for hearsay and second-hand information.
   
   The fact that the change made this complaint explicitly possible indicates either an unlikely coincidence, the complaint being highly opportunistic or this whole thing being preplanned at a higher level.

4. 2019-10-02 at 12:12 AM UTC

   #24
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
   read my second post there.
   
   you wouldn't need to worry about that if you could just stick to one account.
5. 2019-10-02 at 12:16 AM UTC

   #25
   Gulm Yung Blood

   Originally posted by aldra read my second post there.
   
   you wouldn't need to worry about that if you could just stick to one account.

   
   Why should I use only one account?
   
   Also this is your second post in that thread
   
   

   Originally posted by aldra he's tremendously fat

   
   Is that what you meant? Pompeo is fat, therefore the forms were changed 'literally days before the Ukraine claim was made'.
6. 2019-10-02 at 12:31 AM UTC

   #26
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition

   Originally posted by Gulm Why should I use only one account?

   
   Why would you not? It's the entire purpose of having accounts.
   
   If your attention span is so short, or commitment to leave so weak that you have to continually make more maybe you'd be more at home at 4chan or some other imageboard.
   The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

   • -SpectraL
7. 2019-10-02 at 12:40 AM UTC

   #27
   Gulm Yung Blood

   Originally posted by aldra Why would you not? It's the entire purpose of having accounts.
   
   If your attention span is so short, or commitment to leave so weak that you have to continually make more maybe you'd be more at home at 4chan or some other imageboard.

   
   I cycle accounts regularly on basically every platform I'm on.
   
   But that's off topic, and this is in a topical forum.
   
   Are you ready to admit that you were wrong all along?
8. 2019-10-02 at 12:42 AM UTC

   #28
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
   why would I?
9. 2019-10-02 at 12:56 AM UTC

   #29
   Gulm Yung Blood

   Originally posted by aldra why would I?

   
   If you had any integrity you would.
   
   But I guess you're not a man of honor you're just a halfie chink fraud
10. 2019-10-02 at 12:58 AM UTC

    #30
    

    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    no, I'm just not a partisan hack.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!

    • mmQ
11. 2019-10-02 at 1:26 AM UTC

    #31
    Gulm Yung Blood

    Originally posted by aldra no, I'm just not a partisan hack.

    
    Go back to Africa
12. 2019-10-02 at 4:51 PM UTC

    #32
    

    Kuntzschutz African Astronaut

    Originally posted by Gulm If you had any integrity you would.
    
    But I guess you're not a man of honor you're just a halfie chink fraud

    
    Resorting to racial slurs like a good antifa douche when he can't win an argument.
13. 2019-10-02 at 5:52 PM UTC

    #33
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole

    At the time the Complainant filed the Disclosure of Urgent Concern form with the ICIG
    on August 12, 2019, the ICIG followed its routine practice and provided the Complainant
    information, including “Background Information on ICWPA Process,” which included the
    following language:
    In order to find an urgent concern “credible,” the IC IG must be in
    possession of reliable, first-hand information. The IC IG cannot transmit
    information via the ICWPA based on an employee’s second-hand
    knowledge of wrongdoing. This includes information received from
    another person, such as when a fellow employee informs you that he/she
    witnessed some type of wrongdoing. (Anyone with first-hand knowledge of the allegations may file a disclosure in writing directly with the IC IG.)
    Similarly, speculation about the existence of wrongdoing does not provide
    sufficient basis to meet the statutory requirements of the ICWPA. If you
    think wrongdoing took place, but can provide nothing more than secondhand or unsubstantiated assertions, IC IG will not be able to process the
    complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA.

    
    
    ?????
14. 2019-10-02 at 8:20 PM UTC

    #34
    Gulm Yung Blood
    The report had first hand and second hand information.
    
    Second hand information must have evidence before the report is even taken into consideration. It's all right there on the ICIG file. Yet all the righties on this site seem to be steering well clear of this thread, and are avoiding actually discussing the issue after days of blabbering misinformation.
    
    The Biden stuff turned out to be false as well, requiring a time machine, but I don't see anything on here about it. Funny that.