User Controls
Technologist believes the "official" 9/11 narrative
-
2019-09-21 at 12:46 AM UTCThat some middle eastern terrorists took out the world trade center buildings with airplanes (never mind that WTC7 collapsed without a single plane hitting it)
Now I implore you to watch this video, because it will open your tiny mind to the truth, that it was an inside job perpetuated by the "deep state"/"illuminati".
The firefighters that were there that day recall hearing the sound of explosions.
Actual engineers and architects know that it was a controlled demolition and are carrying out an investigation into the event, finally.
People like you aren't only stupid, you are intentionally so. -
2019-09-21 at 12:48 AM UTC
-
2019-09-21 at 4:20 AM UTCLmao you guys are crackpots.
There was a conspiracy but not this one. -
2019-09-21 at 4:45 AM UTCLOL what a normie!
-
2019-09-21 at 9:08 AM UTCIt was clearly all holograms. I doubt there ever was a world trade center it was just mirrors and shit
-
2019-09-21 at 2:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Japan-Is-Eternal That some middle eastern terrorists took out the world trade center buildings with airplanes (never mind that WTC7 collapsed without a single plane hitting it)
Now I implore you to watch this video, because it will open your tiny mind to the truth, that it was an inside job perpetuated by the "deep state"/"illuminati".
The firefighters that were there that day recall hearing the sound of explosions.
Actual engineers and architects know that it was a controlled demolition and are carrying out an investigation into the event, finally.
People like you aren't only stupid, you are intentionally so.
There's bound to be a few rubes that honestly think 9/11 wasn't done by Bush even though it's been widely accepted for the last decade that it was absolutely an inside job.
I mean, do they even deny it anymore?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-09-21 at 3:35 PM UTCOk, so I watched the entire video. They keep saying there were explosives already in the buildings. Ok, I find that to be credible, but who’s to say that it wasn’t placed by al-Qaeda agents?
-
2019-09-21 at 3:39 PM UTCThere were no explosives. Jet fuel melts steel beams
If it was a plane though where is the fuselage and wings? Or the black box?
It was clearly a cruise missile -
2019-09-21 at 3:43 PM UTC
-
2019-09-21 at 3:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood There were no explosives. Jet fuel melts steel beams
If it was a plane though where is the fuselage and wings? Or the black box?
It was clearly a cruise missile
Jet Fuel very easily melts steel beams. People who cry that it fell without a plane hitting don't understand how support beams work.
Go ahead and start knocking down the support walls and beams in your house. See how long what's left holds up.
These idiots will believe anything on YouTube -
2019-09-21 at 3:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist Ok, so I watched the entire video. They keep saying there were explosives already in the buildings. Ok, I find that to be credible, but who’s to say that it wasn’t placed by al-Qaeda agents?
Anybody that knows how to hold a conversation have any ideas about my question? Who’s to say how the explosives got there? -
2019-09-21 at 3:53 PM UTCIt was planted by a bunch of Rabbis
-
2019-09-21 at 3:56 PM UTC
-
2019-09-21 at 3:57 PM UTCThe CIA took remote control of the planes and flew them into the towers so they could get their illegal and immoral invasions started. There never were any terrorists at all. They just had to get idiotic public outrage on their side, and that's how they did it.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-09-21 at 3:58 PM UTCIncluding the jedis.
Who made the most money from 9/11? Insurance companies and the military industrial complex..and who is behind those?
Always follow the money when a big event goes down and look who benefits. Follow the noseThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-09-21 at 4:03 PM UTCThe explosions were just for show along with the airplanes.
The buildings were destroyed by directed energy weapons, you'll laugh at me for saying that now but in time it will be common knowledge.
As for why it wasn't arabs that are responsible, from the symbolism and predictive programming featured in several movies, tv shows and albums to the fact that the deep state and intelligence agencies are far too advanced to let something like that slip by.
It was an inside job carried out by corrupt people in our intelligence agencies so that they could invade the middle east and place puppet governments in those nations and pave the way for the "greater israel project".The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-09-21 at 4:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by 8stringflinG Jet Fuel very easily melts steel beams.
wrong.
jet fuel alone isnt capable of melting steel. its the combination of plastics, red hot steel and ALUMINUM that made up 96% of the plane's body that turned into a hot soup of thermate/thermite that melted everything.
200+ tons of aluminum makes a hell of a load of thermates. -
2019-09-21 at 4:15 PM UTC
-
2019-09-21 at 5:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny wrong.
jet fuel alone isnt capable of melting steel. its the combination of plastics, red hot steel and ALUMINUM that made up 96% of the plane's body that turned into a hot soup of thermate/thermite that melted everything.
200+ tons of aluminum makes a hell of a load of thermates.
No, because the expended and unexpended thermate granules tested throughout the dust of the collapses were found to be military-grade and only available through military contractors. -
2019-09-21 at 5:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Technologist My point exactly. If there were explosions, the explosives could have been placed by anyone, including al-Qaeda.
Far as I am aware, the explosives had some sort of nuclear powered charges in them? Now I'm not saying that Al-Quaeda couldn't have procured some of those, but how do you expect them to get enough matter to make as many dirty bombs to ruin all of it? And with as much yield as there was, too?
More importantly, demolition is a very complicated thing. I won't claim I know the specifics for those towers, but you'd have to really turn the entire building inside out to place enough explosives to topple it. I'm not saying it would be completely impossible, but it would take entire work crews, cleared to work on the buildings.
Or it would take the explosives being placed there in the building from the start. Which again begs the question of how would Al-Quaeda bring in enough "employees" to cover the entirety of the construction project?
Just some speculation here. But methinks it had to be an inside job, simply due to the scale of the attack.
