User Controls

Legal yet morally objectionable things you can do

  1. #61
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker A person who doesn't understand that a child is hurt by a being molested is not a good judge of what is good for a child. Analogies do not change that.

    the child is only hurt because the society with which that child lives in convinced him or her that he/she has been hurt.

    in the same way kids had been duped into thinking that smoking is cool, or wearing nike makes them a winner.
  2. #62
    Originally posted by G4LM It does not have a negative connotation. It's straight up definitively negative to assault people through molestation. Connotation is the meaning outside of the definition.

    Anal fakt 3005

    associated meaning.
  3. #63
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Sophie Yes but that is assuming i don't understand that molestation doesn't hurt a child. I do.

    You just shored my point firmly. You know that something is harmful to a child and choose to engage in that behavior. Proving by your own actions that your judgement regarding child welfare is poor.
  4. #64
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You just shored my point firmly. You know that something is harmful to a child and choose to engage in that behavior.

    What behavior, nigga?
  5. #65
    tee hee hee Naturally Camouflaged [slangily complete this slumberer]
    Keep on driving by a bad vehicular accident
  6. #66
    G4LM African Astronaut
    Originally posted by tee hee hee Keep on driving by a bad vehicular accident

    How is that immoral? I think the moral obligation only kicks in when it happens right in front of you. Usually that's not the case tho and people/police are already there and helping. No sense in making a crowd.
  7. #67
    D4NG0 motherfucker
    Originally posted by G4LM It does not have a negative connotation. It's straight up definitively negative to assault people through molestation. Connotation is the meaning outside of the definition.

    Anal fakt 3005

    It does have a negative connotation in respect to its use regarding children, though. 'Molest' is merely unwanted physical contact, annoyances, or disturbances - all of which can mean a host of different things. To use it in a context where children are being discussed gives it a specific negative connotation.
  8. #68
    Sophie Pedophile Tech Support
    Originally posted by D4NG0 It does have a negative connotation in respect to its use regarding children, though. 'Molest' is merely unwanted physical contact, annoyances, or disturbances - all of which can mean a host of different things. To use it in a context where children are being discussed gives it a specific negative connotation.

    Thank you Dango Daikazoku, i knew i said it right the first time.
  9. #69
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    it basically just means to annoy or bother someone but I think it has a specific legal definitiion that involves interfering with a person sexually
  10. #70
    G4LM African Astronaut
    Originally posted by aldra it basically just means to annoy or bother someone but I think it has a specific legal definitiion that involves interfering with a person sexually

    It does, which is why it isn't a connotation. You can't just be like 'oh no I'm using THIS outdated definition not the common modern one everyone uses'

    If you tell someone your uncle molests you all the time, nobody is going to think he's just annoying. The definition is clear. On some dictionaries the bothering definition is listed as archaic.
  11. #71
    play station pee
  12. #72
    play station whore
  13. #73
    play station poo
  14. #74
    play station cum,mn e
  15. #75
    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Best to use the word, molestation.
  16. #76
    G4LM African Astronaut
    Playmolestation 4
  17. #77
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Sophie Thank you Dango Daikazoku, i knew i said it right the first time.

    Correct semantics < not being a POS
  18. #78
    D4NG0 motherfucker
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Correct semantics = not being a POS

    fix'd
  19. #79
    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. #80
    HTS highlight reel
    Originally posted by G4LM It does, which is why it isn't a connotation. You can't just be like 'oh no I'm using THIS outdated definition not the common modern one everyone uses'

    If you tell someone your uncle molests you all the time, nobody is going to think he's just annoying. The definition is clear. On some dictionaries the bothering definition is listed as archaic.

    I feel like in the UK, molest is still used in a similar context to "accost" or "man-handle", outside of the sexual meaning. But certainly in US English it basically solely implies diddling.
Jump to Top