User Controls
all is mind
-
2019-08-02 at 12:27 PM UTCThere is two selves. A lower self, which resides in the here and now, and your higher self, which is timeless. Both your selves are the same person: you. Your higher self can be aware of your lower self, but your lower self is totally unaware of your higher self, and intentionally so. However, you can still make certain connections to your higher self and vice versa. Your higher self can even help your lower self understand and get in line with your higher self, through subtle connections. Both realities are real as real can get, even the lower life; it's not just an imagination or a mirage or a trick. Both selves are just as important as the other, and yet they are the same entity. Both are you.
-
2019-08-02 at 12:28 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe You actually got it right this time, this argument also has no purpose or meaning. Don't try to tell me what I think you piece of shit or you can consider this discussion over.
I was referring to the argument YOU WERE MAKING you fuckbrained retard, of course you thought that was meaningful. But it ain't.
I agree that this overall discussion is pointless too though, but seeing you incorrectly sperg rage here trying to be tuff was entertaining, so #worth. -
2019-08-02 at 12:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe That's because purpose isn't real. You could even just ignore the concept of "purpose" all together, because it isn't real.
What is it that you're claiming isn't real? You need to make an actual positive claim that can be disproven in the world.
Watch Obbe do several barrel rolls to avoid answering this in a straightforward manner. -
2019-08-02 at 7:41 PM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator What is it that you're claiming isn't real? You need to make an actual positive claim that can be disproven in the world.
Watch Obbe do several barrel rolls to avoid answering this in a straightforward manner.
Purpose isn't real. Spiders don't spin webs "on purpose" any more than flied get caught in webs "on purpose" or particles collide "on purpose". It's just stuff happening. Nothing happens on purpose. Nothing is meant to happen. It just does. "Survival" has no purpose. If something survives or dies, again, that has nothing to do with purpose or meaning.
Can you just not tell me what I "need to do"? That would be great. -
2019-08-02 at 7:59 PM UTC
-
2019-08-02 at 8:31 PM UTCDon't tell me what to do. Look it up in the dictionary, retard.
-
2019-08-02 at 8:33 PM UTC
-
2019-08-02 at 8:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Spiders don't spin webs "on purpose" any more than flied get caught in webs "on purpose"
Of course they do. The spider makes the net to serve a function for it. It doesn't know it but that is what it is doing. Man identifies the purpose but we don't make it up. All our purposes are embedded in our evolutionary environment. It may seem that there is something special happening in your brain when you identify a purpose but there isn't.
The fact is, again, you're simply trying your hardest to not actually make any coherent argument. You're just saying "no it ain't" over and overor particles collide "on purpose".
Biology doesn't operate on the level of individual particles. -
2019-08-02 at 8:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator Of course they do. The spider makes the net to serve a function for it. It doesn't know it but that is what it is doing. Man identifies the purpose but we don't make it up. All our purposes are embedded in our evolutionary environment. It may seem that there is something special happening in your brain when you identify a purpose but there isn't.
The fact is, again, you're simply trying your hardest to not actually make any coherent argument. You're just saying "no it ain't" over and over
Biology doesn't operate on the level of individual particles.
Why do you believe spiders spin webs on purpose, but do not believe that individual particles collide on purpose? Biology and physics aren't two different things, just different modes of description.
Spider's don't do anything on purpose. They just do what they do. Man likes to imagine everything happens for a purpose, but that's just what man does. If man were to destroy the planet, you might think it was on purpose but you would be wrong. -
2019-08-03 at 9:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by Obbe Why do you believe spiders spin webs on purpose, but do not believe that individual particles collide on purpose?
For the same reason why two particles can be a pair of particles but one cannot: a pair can't he reduced down to either particle, it's both together. And even if you replaced either or both of the particles it would still be a pair. No, the word "pair" that I'm saying isn't important, what's important is that it describes something in the world. It describes TWO particles together, and not any particular one. No, neither of the particles have any idea of anything, but it is a fact of the world that the two particles are together and that's what we call a pair. I didn't invent two particles being together, they just are. I don't need god to say it is a thing to make it a thing, because the thing I'm describing is that thing.Spider's don't do anything on purpose. They just do what they do.
Everything is doing what it does. What they do is spin a web on purpose.
By the same logic "two" "particles" don't "collide", they're "just doing what they do".
That's not an argument. It's not a coherent point. It's just you babbling like a retard.Man likes to imagine everything happens for a purpose, but that's just what man does. If man were to destroy the planet, you might think it was on purpose but you would be wrong.
God didn't create man in one day like the Bible says. I don't know why you keep pushing Man as something special that wasn't shaped out of natural selection, but this isn't your Bible studies group. -
2019-08-03 at 2:33 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-08-03 at 2:37 PM UTCI remember my first joint...
-
2019-08-03 at 2:39 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 4:40 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 4:41 PM UTCAlso it's funny that SpectraL thanked it because he thinks Obbe is actually supporting creationism.
-
2019-08-03 at 6:06 PM UTCthe time to make 50+ post can be saved if op just define before hand what he considers 'control' is.
-
2019-08-03 at 7 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 7:26 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 7:39 PM UTCI've run out of weed again. This thread makes no sense.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-08-03 at 7:41 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
