User Controls
Jeffery (((Epstein))) attempts suicide
-
2019-08-03 at 1:53 PM UTCSection 12 (1) of the Constitution provides: Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right (a) not to be deprived of freedom arbitrarily or without just cause; (b) not to be detained without trial; (c) to be free from all forms of violence from either public or private sources; (d) not to be tortured in any way; and (e) not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way. In a perfect world, such a right would be absolute.
-
2019-08-03 at 1:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat Section 12 (1) of the Constitution provides: Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right (a) not to be deprived of freedom arbitrarily or without just cause; (b) not to be detained without trial; © to be free from all forms of violence from either public or private sources; (d) not to be tortured in any way; and (e) not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way. In a perfect world, such a right would be absolute.
Federal Courts
In federal court, the Bail Reform Act of 1984 dictates when a judge can deny bail based on a defendant’s dangerousness. Generally, protective detentions are allowed in the federal system only for defendants charged with certain crimes. These crimes include:
crimes of violence
crimes with a maximum penalty of life in prison or death
drug offenses that carry at least ten years in prison
any felony, where the defendant has at least two prior qualifying felony convictions, and
felonies that involve minor victims, possession or use of weapons, or failure to register as a sex offender.
(18 U.S.C.A. § 3142(e) & (f)(1) (2016).) Being charged with one of these offenses only makes a defendant eligible for denial of bail. To actually deny bail, the judge must also find by clear and convincing evidence that there aren’t any conditions of release that could protect the public. In making this call, a judge is supposed to consider:
the nature and circumstances of the charges
the seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant
the strength of the prosecution’s evidence against the defendant
the defendant’s criminal history, and
personal characteristics of the defendant.
Relevant personal characteristics might include things like substance abuse and mental health history, employment, and family ties. (18 U.S.C.A. § 3142(g) (2016).)
A judge who decides to deny bail must include the reasons for the denial in a written order. A defendant can then appeal the decision to a higher court. But the chances of winning the appeal are usually pretty slim. (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 3142(i), 3145 (2016).) -
2019-08-03 at 1:56 PM UTCHe is no more of a flight risk than Polanski was and he got bail or no more than anyone else for that matter. Jeff only has u.s. citizenship so they are drawing conclusions if they somehow conclude him a flight risk based on his assets. Thats like saying OJ or anyone else should get bail because they have assets and only poor or stupid people who do not travel should get bail? You know what drawing conclusions means in court? I doubt it since unlike me you probably never did anytime or spent time in courts. Drawing as this murderer inmate explained to me named Nick in Santa Cruz (Kuczak or Kuszak or something) is when someone is playing basketball from inside the bunk area of the unit and says he can make it by throwing the ball and bouncing it off the wall to make it bounce again outside and into the basket. It is drawing conclusions or reaching I think it was what he called it.
-
2019-08-03 at 1:58 PM UTCALso the fact he didnt run the first time while on probation and being tipped off of the new arrests (if he wasnt tipped off he isnt very well connected as even Polanski was tipped off and so was the LS studio guy and the other porn guru in Ukraine who is jedi also and currently lives in Monterey CA as a freelance writer never even doing a day in jail ALexander Fradis) so the judge has no reason to suspect flight risk or no more reason than to suspect it on him vs anyone else that got bail in the history of the u.s. like Polanski.
-
2019-08-03 at 1:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat He is no more of a flight risk than Polanski was and he got bail or no more than anyone else for that matter. Jeff only has u.s. citizenship so they are drawing conclusions if they somehow conclude him a flight risk based on his assets. Thats like saying OJ or anyone else should get bail because they have assets and only poor or stupid people who do not travel should get bail? You know what drawing conclusions means in court? I doubt it since unlike me you probably never did anytime or spent time in courts. Drawing as this murderer inmate explained to me named Nick in Santa Cruz (Kuczak or Kuszak or something) is when someone is playing basketball from inside the bunk area of the unit and says he can make it by throwing the ball and bouncing it off the wall to make it bounce again outside and into the basket. It is drawing conclusions or reaching I think it was what he called it.
Maybe you should contact Epstein and offer to argue that on his behalf. -
2019-08-03 at 2:01 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Maybe you should contact Epstein and offer to argue that on his behalf.
P.S. I have been charged with over 13 felonies in the last 40 years. I have never been convicted. Because I am not a stupid pollack who thinks he knows the law. I am smart enough to pay people who do know the law when I go to court. -
2019-08-03 at 2:24 PM UTCIf the judge denied him bail that chick film maker who made a documentary about Polanski called Wanted and Desired should make one about Epstein and his even more biased and discriminatory judge. Since what he is doing is worse than anything Polanski’s judge ever did. How can you evena rgue that the judge isnt biased or letting public opinion sway him and even more so than poor Roman?
-
2019-08-03 at 2:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat If the judge denied him bail that chick film maker who made a documentary about Polanski called Wanted and Desired should make one about Epstein and his even more biased and discriminatory judge. Since what he is doing is worse than anything Polanski’s judge ever did. How can you evena rgue that the judge isnt biased or letting public opinion sway him and even more so than poor Roman?
You don't have any facts of either case. You opinion is meaningless. Read the entire transcript of both bail hearings and maybe I'll care what you think. Until then I will rely on the opinion of the current AG's DoJ. -
2019-08-03 at 2:27 PM UTCI have read polanskis, and just what the media says regarding Epsteins. Either way the media are a lot more ignorant than me and most of them have no idea what an actual hearing is or what even legal terms mean or what is going on right in front of them.
-
2019-08-03 at 2:29 PM UTCWHen the media say things like statutory term carries at least one yr and then claim that Polanski’s judge promised to releas ehima fter a 90 day op or observation (this isnt even part of any plea deals or sentence) than claims Polanski was framed because the judge didnt honor an off the chambers meeting (which is off the chambers so unofficial in every way) how ignorant is the media blaming that judge or system when it is like this for everyone including EPstein?
-
2019-08-03 at 2:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat I have read polanskis, and just what the media says regarding Epsteins. Either way the media are a lot more ignorant than me and most of them have no idea what an actual hearing is or what even legal terms mean or what is going on right in front of them.
BS you have not read the entire court transcript of Polanski's bail hearing. If you do not post a link to the entire transcript in reply to this post you admit as much. -
2019-08-03 at 2:37 PM UTCThey had it linked during his last case in Switzerland. The original Geimer disposition and much of the other court hearings. The media has it thats for sure.
-
2019-08-03 at 2:37 PM UTCFagboy, I am not gonna do your homework for you. I am not googling for it when you could do it yourself in about 10 seconds.
-
2019-08-03 at 2:37 PM UTCI dont get you guys’ hate and bias for Jeff. I mean if you have that sort of envy I feel bad for you.
-
2019-08-03 at 2:38 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 2:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat Females snitching left and right and making shit up aboutnpeople in the office or getting ahead with manipulations or turning in illegal workers to the government snd scting how females dod eserve it sll and more. Thats not even mentioning their feminism and metoo.
but you don't complain when as a male you get to use your strength advantage or ability to use intimidation and brute force whenever you need to tho. but when a woman uses the only abilities available to her then you start crying like a fucking bitch.
lol, pussy.
. -
2019-08-03 at 2:44 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 2:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat If so then he wont spill anything nor have reasons to. And if they want they cnss wy fuk you or spindoctor the guikiible americns public anytime czlling it a deed for the greater good.nthey did it like i mentioned to nazis who worked on the rocket program.
do wut?
nobody speaks polski here
. -
2019-08-03 at 2:52 PM UTC
-
2019-08-03 at 2:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Federal Courts
In federal court, the Bail Reform Act of 1984 dictates when a judge can deny bail based on a defendant’s dangerousness. Generally, protective detentions are allowed in the federal system only for defendants charged with certain crimes. These crimes include:
crimes of violence
crimes with a maximum penalty of life in prison or death
drug offenses that carry at least ten years in prison
any felony, where the defendant has at least two prior qualifying felony convictions, and
felonies that involve minor victims, possession or use of weapons, or failure to register as a sex offender.
(18 U.S.C.A. § 3142(e) & (f)(1) (2016).) Being charged with one of these offenses only makes a defendant eligible for denial of bail. To actually deny bail, the judge must also find by clear and convincing evidence that there aren’t any conditions of release that could protect the public. In making this call, a judge is supposed to consider:
the nature and circumstances of the charges
the seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant
the strength of the prosecution’s evidence against the defendant
the defendant’s criminal history, and
personal characteristics of the defendant.
Relevant personal characteristics might include things like substance abuse and mental health history, employment, and family ties. (18 U.S.C.A. § 3142(g) (2016).)
A judge who decides to deny bail must include the reasons for the denial in a written order. A defendant can then appeal the decision to a higher court. But the chances of winning the appeal are usually pretty slim. (18 U.S.C.A. §§ 3142(i), 3145 (2016).)
they will also consider if the accussed has the resources to easily flee the country, including money and connections, especially if known to have connections abroad.
i mean how many friends in the movie industry would this guy have with their own boats and planes?
.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
