User Controls
Feral nigger throws 8 year old boy into train (Germany)
-
2019-07-30 at 2:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Armies all wore bright uniforms because black powder created so much smoke after the first few volleys it was the only way you could tell friend from foe. You really are stupid.
Ah yes how will the English ever tell their comrades apart from black negro African Boer guerillas unless they have bright red uniforms?
I'm sure all those dusty, smoky, ashy, sooty environments faced by soldiers in modern camo must just make them shoot each other in the face m I rite.
Lmao. -
2019-07-30 at 3:45 PM UTCWhy didn't the other side wear bright red, too?
-
2019-07-30 at 4:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country The purpose of lining up for battle was to close with the enemy in such a manner as to force their retreat. If you charged the enemy they would just bayonet you. If you stayed far away, you couldn't hit them. If you used too much cover, you would be too spread out and they would charge you and bayonet you instead. The logical thing was to line up and let discipline, training and maneuvers deliver you a victory. Often the infantry were just denying ground to the enemy, not even trying to win anything themselves. And muskets were inaccurate enough that getting shot at wasn't such a huge deal as it would be now.
Not that pitched battle was a very regular thing.
We are always told that battle in Napoleonic or WW1 times made no sense, but actually we just have a warped view on how those battles were fought.
but indians [red] did not fight this way. -
2019-07-30 at 4:04 PM UTC
-
2019-07-30 at 4:37 PM UTCThis planet would be so peaceful without shitskins and jews
-
2019-07-30 at 5:23 PM UTC
-
2019-07-30 at 5:25 PM UTCwhat if there were 3 different finger prints? from the same hand...that's 3 separate items of evidence as the print on each finger is different.
-
2019-07-30 at 5:32 PM UTC
-
2019-07-30 at 5:47 PM UTC
-
2019-07-30 at 5:47 PM UTC
-
2019-07-30 at 6:13 PM UTC
-
2019-07-30 at 11 PM UTC
-
2019-07-30 at 11:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Deep fakes can easily be detected by a close examination of the data itself.
The depth of the fake relies only on the amount of resources you are willing to throw into it.
And it's mad easy to make even a badly manipulated image look virtually un-analysable by most common forensic tools. The problem is with making it pass the eye test conclusively, which this is only going to get better at as a tool. -
2019-07-30 at 11:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny senario :
a butcher knife was among thousands on display on the shelf if a huge supermarket chain.
someone shopper just took it up, take a look and put it back on the shelf. another killer then buys the knive without ever touching the knife, holding it by its paper sheath.
that knife ended up being a murder weapon and the prints left on it were of the innocent shopper.
A. Why did the innocent shopper unsheath the knife?
B. Either way, if I were him I would probably have an alibi and if i didnt I would find the CCTV footage in the store that showed me handling and putting back the knife. -
2019-07-31 at 12:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator The depth of the fake relies only on the amount of resources you are willing to throw into it.
And it's mad easy to make even a badly manipulated image look virtually un-analysable by most common forensic tools. The problem is with making it pass the eye test conclusively, which this is only going to get better at as a tool.
You do realize a video file is created with data, don't you? -
2019-07-31 at 12:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ A. Why did the innocent shopper unsheath the knife?
B. Either way, if I were him I would probably have an alibi and if i didnt I would find the CCTV footage in the store that showed me handling and putting back the knife.
And also, fingerprints don't just chill on a handle, how the fuck are you gonna stab someone with it using a paper sheath without smudging the fingerprint? It's just your finger oils that has been depressed to different levels... It's hard enough as it is to get a clean set of prints off an otherwise untouched surface, people naturally smudge them to shit because you're not generally holding anything specifically to leave good prints. -
2019-07-31 at 12:13 AM UTC
-
2019-07-31 at 12:16 AM UTC
-
2019-07-31 at 12:33 AM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator And also, fingerprints don't just chill on a handle, how the fuck are you gonna stab someone with it using a paper sheath without smudging the fingerprint? It's just your finger oils that has been depressed to different levels… It's hard enough as it is to get a clean set of prints off an otherwise untouched surface, people naturally smudge them to shit because you're not generally holding anything specifically to leave good prints.
Why'd you take you thank back, NIGGER?
yeah I cant imagine there are too many clean prints lifted off of knife handles. -
2019-07-31 at 12:45 AM UTC
