User Controls

Do any of you Republicans still think that climate change is a fallacy?

  1. #61
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Archer513 Where my house is

    Was a 200 ft glacier thousands of years ago

    So,yea…thank god for climate change or you ppl wouldn’t be enjoying Ohio’s delicious corn and soy beans

    MORALLY SUPERIOR BEINGs

    Ohio really does have great corn.
  2. #62
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Ohio really does have great corn.

    so, you enjoy corn porn.
  3. #63
    NARCassist gollums fat coach
    you really do say the stupidest things bennt


    .
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. #64
    iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    I've said this before and here it is again, SCIENCE, as an institution only 2,000 years old DEALING WITH A WORLD THAT 4.6 BILLION YEARS OLD.

    Science, for how intelligent they may appear, have no freaking ideas to what is happening.

    Now, had we had Scientific weather pattern data from a 10 million year old Lab Rat to compare our current weather patterns, to get the algorithm right, some could unpack their buried heads they shove up them rank holes and see we are only guessing at if what is happening is not actually a stage Earth goes through, or if we have done something to be related.

    2,000 years knowledge vs 4.6 Billion years stage formation
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. #65
    larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged
    Right. Like how does science claim to know anything about physics when they don't have all the info from big bang/pre big bang? Stupid scientists.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. #66
    Grylls Cum Looking Faggot [abrade this vocal tread-softly]
    ikr they still havent even realised the earth is flat




    0.00348 btc
  7. #67
    Ghost Black Hole
    The universe is flat
  8. #68
    iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by larrylegend8383 Right. Like how does science claim to know anything about physics when they don't have all the info from big bang/pre big bang? Stupid scientists.



    Mathematics only defines a formula for the purpose of claiming numerical proof. Physics itself, and then separated by its Laws can physically be seen in action, Language is best to define it.
  9. #69
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Grylls ikr they still havent even realised the earth is flat




    0.00348 btc

    If the earth was flat cats would have knocked everything off of it already.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. #70
    Originally posted by iam_asiam68 Mathematics only defines a formula for the purpose of claiming numerical proof.

    Is that what you tell the IRS?
  11. #71
    iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Is that what you tell the IRS?




    That, and their W40 forms can find themselves shoved up their nostrils. Like teaching a dog not to crap on the floor; after it craps, you dose its nose deep into and say, that's what grass is for as your boot connects and the Dog gets a new enlightenment on your relationship.
  12. #72
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Is that what you tell the IRS?

    I don't believe in Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, or the IRS.
  13. #73
    Grylls Cum Looking Faggot [abrade this vocal tread-softly]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker If the earth was flat cats would have knocked everything off of it already.

    either way you'd still be a faggot




    0.00348 btc
  14. #74
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker I don't believe in Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, or the IRS.

    Do you believe in life after love?


  15. #75
    Speedy Parker Black Hole
    Originally posted by Grylls either way you'd still be a faggot




    0.00348 btc

    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Thanks for letting me know how much I piss you off.
  16. #76
    larrylegend8383 Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by iam_asiam68 Mathematics only defines a formula for the purpose of claiming numerical proof. Physics itself, and then separated by its Laws can physically be seen in action, Language is best to define it.

    So what you are saying is, even without all the information, scientists can take some observable data and still figure out what is going on?

    WELL GODDAMN THOSE TRICKY NERDS AND THEIR WITCHY WAYS
Jump to Top