User Controls
Do you guys think a good strategy to get into a 16 yo’s pants
-
2019-07-14 at 2:56 PM UTCIs for me to talk to her on social media like Instagram for a long time and wait until she dumps her boyfriend or gets in a fight with him?
-
2019-07-14 at 3:01 PM UTCro.
-
2019-07-14 at 3:01 PM UTChip.
-
2019-07-14 at 3:01 PM UTCnoel.
-
2019-07-14 at 3:03 PM UTCdont wait for anything. Get to know her under the guise of friendship 1st, get her drunk, and ur in like sin.
-
2019-07-14 at 3:51 PM UTCOp aren't you like 30?
-
2019-07-14 at 4:18 PM UTCGet her drunk. PROTIP: Teenage girls are annoying 9 out of 10 times.
-
2019-07-14 at 4:20 PM UTC
-
2019-07-14 at 4:36 PM UTC
-
2019-07-14 at 6:01 PM UTC
-
2019-07-14 at 6:16 PM UTClol op is such a loser he needs other dudes to tell him how to have sex with a girl. If you haven't figured it out by yourself now op, you'll probably never know. I dunno maybe ask hikirumori for advice lol
-
2019-07-14 at 6:35 PM UTCHikiki makes OP look normal and well adjusted.
-
2019-07-14 at 6:52 PM UTC
-
2019-07-14 at 7:11 PM UTCOP, you easily win the award for least likable pedophile of NiS. You should be proud.
-
2019-07-14 at 7:35 PM UTCtbf this thread is bait and 16 is above the age of consent in poland/croatia or where ever he's from, so he's not really a pedo is he? 15 is legal. 16 is legal in most US states. the only reason people think 18 is some sacred number is that you have to be 18 to do porn, and 18 is the age in california (and californian culture informs the world's culture via hollywood).
not that im into 15 year olds. i do think it's kinda creepy, but this isnt noncery -
2019-07-14 at 7:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by HTS tbf this thread is bait and 16 is above the age of consent in poland/croatia or where ever he's from, so he's not really a pedo is he? 15 is legal. 16 is legal in most US states. the only reason people think 18 is some sacred number is that you have to be 18 to do porn, and 18 is the age in california (and californian culture informs the world's culture via hollywood).
not that im into 15 year olds. i do think it's kinda creepy, but this isnt noncery
its very noncery, and why is a thirty year old gont asking how to hit on 16 years. just seems like the guy is obsessive, you don't see any gonts asking how to hit on girls in their 20's or 30's just some guy obsessed with something way younger than him because of his pathological disease -
2019-07-14 at 8:29 PM UTCIm 34 not 30. I look more 30 or 28 thiugh.
-
2019-07-14 at 8:32 PM UTC
Originally posted by Bill Krozby its very noncery, and why is a thirty year old gont asking how to hit on 16 years. just seems like the guy is obsessive, you don't see any gonts asking how to hit on girls in their 20's or 30's just some guy obsessed with something way younger than him because of his pathological disease
There is no such thing as a pathologic disease. This is what scrhinks tell you to get you coming back to sessions. Just like ptsd one time was not even diagnosed it was just looked at as shell shock but noe you gotta make moeny off of it and call it some disease. -
2019-07-14 at 8:34 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat There is no such thing as a pathologic disease. This is what scrhinks tell you to get you coming back to sessions. Just like ptsd one time was not even diagnosed it was just looked at as shell shock but noe you gotta make moeny off of it and call it some disease.
You're a detriment to pedos world wide. -
2019-07-14 at 8:37 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie You're a detriment to pedos world wide.
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as pedophilia, is in fact, hebephilia, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, ephebophilia. Pedophilia is not merely the attraction to anyone under 18, but rather a totally separate disorder (not a legal term) listed as a sexual-psychological disorder categorized under paraphilias, a group of sexual-psychological disorders in the DSM-IV and considered a disorder under the standards of the American Psychological Association. Many people could be considered ephebophiles despite the fact that they themselves may not know the term, much less what it means. Through a peculiar turn of events, ephebophilia and hebephilia became grouped under the very general and inconclusive cultural term "pedophilia," and the majority of people using the term are unaware that they are referring to non-paraphilic sexual preferences that are unmentioned in the DSM-IV and occur relatively harmlessly in a great deal of the population. There really is a pedophilia, and these people may be referring to it, but nevertheless it is a small part of what is labeled under "pedophilia." Pedophilia is labeled as a paraphilia because it is by nature unhealthy. Paraphilias are all unhealthy and destructive to relationships, but are restricted to the definitions set forth in the DSM. Pedophilia is simply grouped with the non pathologized conditions of hebephilia and hebephilia because they share a few similar traits. In reality, pedophilia separate from both and should be treated as such, and many people described as pedophiles would be better described as hebephiles or ephebophiles.