Like you know these people. The one's who are essentially full time activists. They're not like out there for one issue and when it's done they're gone, they're full time sticking it to the man, and going after any little thing that can harm the government or the reputation of the government.
So contrast them with the Dakota Access Pipeline protesters who are Native folk protecting their ancestral homelands and sacred grounds, to the Dakota Access Pipeline protesters who last week were at the Occupy Wall Street protests. They are just in it for ways to erode the reputation and confidence held in the government. If they think this issue can arouse public opposition to the government they are in it.
You get them putting the posters up around universities and campus towns, you get them setting up stalls in the same places and at subway stations. Handing out leaflets and similar. Anywhere there is a social movement they can try and infiltrate they will. They're not in it for anything other than viva la revolucion.
So yeah, at this protest, they weren't many of them. Around 20 or a few less. They were outside a government building. They were protesting the education system and how it needs to boycott a government policy related to children overseas not getting a fair education. The issue is emotive and therefore very easily able to be adapted in to mainstream consciousness, because it is a human rights type of issue, like empathy. It was not like a march down the main street or in a particularly public place. It was at a government department head office that I was walking past to get to the train station.
They seem small and insignificant right? 20 people doing this on this day well out of the public eye.
WRONG. THEY ARE SO INFLUENTIAL.
The shit they get involved in has penetrated society. They have been doing this type of stuff for years. Their issues are getting mainstream media coverage and mainstream social acceptance. They have infiltrated future generations via university activism. They just turn up on campus and aren't even students...
So you get all these young people, the emerging generations who are just starting to become politically astute or aware, getting exposed to this type of propaganda and it is very convincing and emotive. Most people aren't inhumane monsters comparable to the politicians and groups that are being presented to them as inhumane monsters. So they are out there feeling warm and fuzzy and wanting to make the world a better place and shunning mainstream political thought as brainwashed sheeple etc. WHICH IT IS. But it is not being deceived by the propaganda of the full time activist groups. We are talking over 20 years of infiltration. They have changed society.
They present as approachable and don't tell you that they support Hamas. Not because they are Palestinian, but because they identify Israel as a part of the USA and therefore need to take Israel down because they are going after America. They tell you what you need to be manipulated to do their bidding. That's their aim. It's not social justice. It's revolution.
Like one of the people at the protest had the megaphone out and was saying how she was a school teacher. She was saying how she has got the future generations of GRADE SCHOOL KIDS supporting her, and that she is not the only teacher doing it. They are totally telling you how they are fighting the government.
So as you can see, a full time activist can convert 100's of people. They aren't as small as they seem. Their influence is wide spread, and they are full time trying to spread influence. Not the same as someone hearing something on TV and thinking it's not right or it doesn't make sense, but full time preachers with misconstrued facts to fill in the blanks and going after as many people as they can to convert them to the faith. And it's not about making the world a better place, it's about making conditions where the current system becomes widely opposed leading to regime change due to instability.
So then you start thinking, how does this shit happen?
How is it in the interests of the government for stuff like this to be happening? In America this is stuff the FBI looks at. In England it's MI5 stuff. It's not activism, it's active subversion.
These groups are identified with organisation names, symbols, publications and planned meetings and gatherings. They are totally controlled by the government agencies. Because of what they are involved in, the government could stop you associating with them and label you a national security risk. They are not loose groups that meet spontaneously at the local cafe and start feeling inspired and march to city hall.
So anyway, the government obviously can control who is a part of these groups. They can also obviously control the activities of these groups. And these groups still exist with wide access and reach in society, and especially in to future generations and their thinking and interaction with their environment.
The government is clearly doing something with these people.
They are breaking laws like sedition and subversion. There are laws against their activities. There are also laws specifically that restrict public gatherings and can be used against all kinds of groups. These laws DO get used. But against these organised groups, they are not. Obviously they are never used against spontaneous gatherings, but people who do this stuff week in week out get targeted and must get police approval for a protest and they can be refused permission to gather in public for reasons such as safety (risk of violence from opposition groups), public order (riots) or national security (sedition again). And you can get arrested for an illegal public gathering if you are doing it every week full time and not getting permission.
Clearly, quite clearly, these 'enemies of the state' are doing the bidding of government agencies. They are, for want of a better word, secret agents of influence the government is using to alter the social fabric.
Because what they are doing is so illegal and can prevent them having the access to society that they have for spreading their influence. They can be placed under curfew and have their social contacts restricted. Which does happen to some people, but not these organized groups. Because they are government agents!
So yeah, they are allowed access to emerging generations, influence in the media, the ability to be the 'authority' on emerging political trends and the ability to establish the direction and parameters of emerging trends and have been for some time. These progressive issues eventually become mainstream. These people are controlling the future mindset of society.
So what are these things that are 'subversive enemies of the state'?
They are groups and ideologies the government wants you to look towards when feeling disenfranchised with the government, and to then assist them with their goal of 'sticking it to the man'.
They are clearly majorly infiltrated and controlled by government agents. They are doing activism to change the direction of society in a way the government could prevent them from doing. So this is what the government wants. The government can stick you there, or encourage you to go there in order to reduce your ability to harm or effect the government, by tricking you in to thinking you AREN'T doing the bidding of the government.
And then, when they turn up in small regional centres or fringe activist groups as a part of their attempt to gain momentum on anything that can harm the government?
They are actually informants for the government reporting on subversive movements that already exist and are just trying to consume them to redirect their purpose.
