User Controls
Pizzagate theory
-
2019-05-19 at 4:45 PM UTCI believe in the Pizzagate but not as a giant network of Government involved. Just some people in Government were members. It's probably just a large network of pervs in which people have to be voted in as members. Pretty much the people who took part were very wealthy and just hired Gang members or criminals to kidnap or purchase unknown children (people not having traditional births and having the babies secretly) as well as adult prostitutes
Its like 9/11
The Government wasn't apart of 9/11. But people in Government and many business owners of large corporation (especially involved in Oil and Real Estate) had profited from pre-knowledge of the event to happen -
2019-05-19 at 4:48 PM UTC
-
2019-05-19 at 4:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jesus Christ The purple pill sounds rather comfy
I'm not bouncing back and forth. 9/11 did not happen as the news and NIST report stated.
We now know that the Saudi's paid for several terrorist on the list to live in San Diego California area before going to Florida and barely learning to fly a fucking Cesna 172 single prop.
I believe those guys (11 out of the 19) on that highjackers official list were on board. What I don't believe is how fucking accurate (no matter how determined they were) to fly into those buildings and a skid into the Pentagon.
Expert commercial pilots say it's not like a military jet that is designed to maneuver like those planes pulled off. Those commercial planes would flip sideways at speeds coming in over 500 miles an hour. That's like 80 percent of Mach speed. the wind sheers at near sea levels would cause those planes to swing back and forth wickedly. in those professional training SIMs that commercial pilots learn in. it took multiple tries for professional pilots to simulate what those guys did in one shot. over and over again. no amateur (even determined to die) could pull it off. No fucking way. Once would of been super lucky. 3 times.. BS -
2019-05-19 at 5:09 PM UTCThere were no planes they were CG (just like the people who jumped out of the windows)
The buildings were demolished using some advanced technique/materials that can turn objects to dust.
As for who did it and why is the biggest question and a major mindfuck -
2019-05-19 at 5:14 PM UTC
-
2019-05-19 at 5:52 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jesus Christ There were no planes they were CG (just like the people who jumped out of the windows)
The buildings were demolished using some advanced technique/materials that can turn objects to dust.
As for who did it and why is the biggest question and a major mindfuck
Wrong. They were real planes. they just had that technology installed (was it called Op Rainbow?)
they basically were beefed up versions of 747 like jets (military use) with harder shells and beefed up Engines. and had Radio Control into the buildings for that kind of accuracy.
Some claimed they were black or grayish looking. Like the quick paint job didn't take to well. perhaps the grey undercoat of primer with just emblems of AA and UA on the planes.
"That wasn't an American Airline" . I mean how did that woman know what airline it was if she didn't see the emblem on it. and if she was on the inside of knowledge, then why bother saying it wasn't one?
things were spun so much. and the people who make these wild hologram claims are just trying to sell books. -
2019-05-19 at 6:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by Tesla Coil Wrong. They were real planes. they just had that technology installed (was it called Op Rainbow?)
they basically were beefed up versions of 747 like jets (military use) with harder shells and beefed up Engines. and had Radio Control into the buildings for that kind of accuracy.
Some claimed they were black or grayish looking. Like the quick paint job didn't take to well. perhaps the grey undercoat of primer with just emblems of AA and UA on the planes.
"That wasn't an American Airline" . I mean how did that woman know what airline it was if she didn't see the emblem on it. and if she was on the inside of knowledge, then why bother saying it wasn't one?
things were spun so much. and the people who make these wild hologram claims are just trying to sell books.
I don't believe there was a Hologram but there is footage of the second plane/UAV/Drone/Whatever hitting. And it's a close up and kind of in slow motion, it appears as though the nose of the plane exits the other side of the building. Which if it was a regular plane is literally impossible, because a plane just crumples up like a tin can if it goes at high velocity into steel and concrete.
Which, in fact leads me to believe the footage is tampered with somehow. I can't find the video on Youtube at the moment.
Also, fire no matter how intense takes a sky scraper down. And if it falls at all it falls over not perfectly into it's foot print.
I did find this though.
-
2019-05-19 at 6:46 PM UTCIt was a controlled demolition using dustification
-
2019-05-19 at 6:47 PM UTCalso has anyone heard about the possibility that Hiroshima and Nagasaki weren't nuked but firebombed?
-
2019-05-19 at 6:49 PM UTC
-
2019-05-19 at 6:51 PM UTC
-
2019-05-19 at 6:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie I did find this though.
uncredible.
first of all its trying to compare steel reinforced concrete building with WTC which were steel beam framed and glass buildings.
and secondly controlled demolitions crush the buildings at ground level, while WTC crushes them at point of impact. -
2019-05-19 at 6:57 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country I once wasted ages trying to explain what an explosion actually was with one of those people on 4chan. He just didn't get it.
An explosion is just material transitioning from a dense state to a less dense state. Solid uranium turning into a 10 million degree vapour for instance. -
2019-05-20 at 8:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie I don't believe there was a Hologram but there is footage of the second plane/UAV/Drone/Whatever hitting. And it's a close up and kind of in slow motion, it appears as though the nose of the plane exits the other side of the building. W
I honestly believe that is a ghost or anomaly in the video CoDec which is a grid of picture per frame that saves data space by repeating things not seen moving. its like a computer software with in the data or old tapes that will record this way. -
2019-05-20 at 8:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny uncredible.
first of all its trying to compare steel reinforced concrete building with WTC which were steel beam framed and glass buildings.
and secondly controlled demolitions crush the buildings at ground level, while WTC crushes them at point of impact.
Reconsider the credibility. The people over at https://www.ae911truth.org/ made this determination. Look at their credentials, they're not a bunch of cooks. -
2019-05-21 at 6:27 AM UTCIt was a pan-caking collapse. The upper floors fell and hit the lower ones like a giant sledgehammer. The external structure of the buildings helped concentrate all the force straight down as well.
Things behave oddly at speed - that's why a flimsy arrow can penetrate a car body at only a hundred mph. -
2019-05-21 at 6:27 AM UTCIt was a pan-caking collapse. The upper floors fell and hit the lower ones like a giant sledgehammer. The external structure of the buildings helped concentrate all the force straight down as well.
Things behave oddly at speed - that's why a flimsy arrow can penetrate a tyre or a car body at only a hundred mph. -
2019-05-21 at 10:11 AM UTCWho fucking cares
We need to focus now on the breakaway civilization and their LARPs against humanity -
2019-05-21 at 5:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sophie Reconsider the credibility. The people over at https://www.ae911truth.org/ made this determination. Look at their credentials, they're not a bunch of cooks.
doesnt mean that non crooks are immune to delusions. -
2019-05-22 at 3:14 AM UTC
