User Controls
Pedo appreciation thread
-
2019-05-19 at 11:28 PM UTC
-
2019-05-19 at 11:28 PM UTC
-
2019-05-19 at 11:30 PM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator You know the disgusting child groomer pedophile is backed up into a corner when he starts grandstanding. Shut up idiot.
Yeah, i am so backed into a corner by your spooky words that will never affect me because you lack the mental capacity to defeat my operational security measures.
You're impotent, fuccboi. -
2019-05-19 at 11:47 PM UTCYour bitch struggling is evidence of your fear and acknowledgement that being found out as a pedophile would be fatal to you. Faggot.
-
2019-05-20 at 12:01 AM UTCFace it paki. I'm a pedo, you hate me, and there's nothing you can do about it. You can feel some type of way about the things that i say, but that's really not my problem.
-
2019-05-20 at 12:13 AM UTC(Hes scron poasting)
-
2019-05-20 at 12:27 AM UTC
-
2019-05-20 at 12:28 AM UTC
-
2019-05-20 at 12:29 AM UTC
-
2019-05-20 at 5:18 AM UTC
-
2019-05-20 at 6:07 AM UTC
-
2019-05-20 at 6:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by DietYellow Ok, story tiem!!!!
Somebody rubbing their cock to child porn is fine, but people freely distributing pictures of nude children is not, because children do not deserve to have to photos of themselves spread to the public, especially when they did not consent to such. It's EMBARRASSING, and you can EMBARRASS someone to death, or do naughty (not sexually naughty) things with those photos that seriously damage someone's reputation for a long time.
I don't care if a pedo rubs their cock to a picture of CP, but I also don't think that people should take pictures of their naked children without their consent and send them out to the entire world. Be cool, that's not cool.
Kill yourself.
Disgusting Autistic loser. -
2019-05-20 at 6:22 AM UTC
-
2019-05-20 at 6:23 AM UTC
-
2019-05-20 at 5:26 PM UTCEventually they'll just start using those techniques to fake kiddy porn. It'll still be illegal of course, but with no way to trace it back to any kids being victimized, they could even make it appear as though some real kids were being raped, even though they never had. I mean what if you had kids, and because of this technology, the FBI came to your house and thought you were raping your own kids because of the fake videos?
Crazy. I think the feds should use these "deep fakes" to catch pedophiles.
It's all just 1s and 0s, so how can it not be possible to fake it? Anything can be faked. Audio, video, anything. -
2019-05-20 at 5:36 PM UTCWouldn't matter if it was real or fake, if you put kiddy porn on the Net. The laws don't stipulate that it needs to be real.
-
2019-05-20 at 6:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Wouldn't matter if it was real or fake, if you put kiddy porn on the Net. The laws don't stipulate that it needs to be real.
It would matter. It might even bother pedophiles to know they might be looking at fake kiddy porn. It would also make it possible to frame people then with fake CP. -
2019-05-20 at 6:27 PM UTC
-
2019-05-20 at 6:30 PM UTC
-
2019-05-20 at 6:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country That would be a useful tool if you could get it into a USB or something. A CP accusation is reputational death.
But how do you get the machine searched?
It takes screenshots of the planted material and sends them off to a command and control server tied up in a bow. You could just download the CP to the target(It's basically a dropper that can screenshot), have it sit there for a while, take screenshots then sloppily delete the evidence. Post the screenshots anonymously as tips to LEA of your preference, they go out to search the device, target says, sure. They ain't no pedo. Then in the crime lab the computer tech finds the sloppily deleted CP.
There ya go. The technical details are a little more specific than that, but if anyone wants to call my bluff, i'd like to know their CPU architecture. And i'll triple dare them to run the binary i send over.
